• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构化患者支持项目对2型糖尿病基础胰岛素治疗依从性和持续性的影响。

Impact of a structured patient support program on adherence and persistence in basal insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Zhou Fang Liz, Yeaw Jason, Karkare Swapna U, DeKoven Mitch, Berhanu Paulos, Reid Timothy

机构信息

Sanofi US, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.

IQVIA, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018 Dec 22;6(1):e000593. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000593. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000593
PMID:30622720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6307592/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Treatment adherence and persistence are essential to achieving therapeutic goals in diabetes and may be improved by patient support programs (PSPs). The COACH Program was launched in 2015 with the goal of supporting patients with diabetes who are prescribed insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300). The study objective was to assess the program's impact on persistence and adherence with therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective 12-month analysis was conducted to compare treatment adherence and persistence in patients treated with Gla-300 who actively participated in the COACH PSP versus those who did not enroll using COACH engagement and claims data for the identification period from February 1, 2016 to July 31, 2016. COACH (n=544) and non-COACH (n=544) participants were matched on selected baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

COACH participants were more likely to be adherent to (68.0% vs 61.4%, p= 0.0201; OR: 1.81, p=0.0002) and persistent (48.5% vs 42.1%, p= 0.0309; discontinuation HR: 0.60, p<0.0001) with Gla-300 than non-COACH patients during the 12-month follow-up after controlling for clinical confounders. Additionally, both insulin-naive and basal insulin switcher COACH participants, respectively, were more likely to be adherent (OR: 2.25, p=0.0082 and OR: 1.662, p=0.0364) and persistent (discontinuation HR: 0.53, p=0.0054 and HR: 0.67, p=0.0492) than non-COACH patients. Finally, COACH participants with greater level of engagement showed better persistence.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that participation and engagement with COACH PSPs are associated with improved persistence and adherence to Gla-300 among patients with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

目的

治疗依从性和持续性对于实现糖尿病治疗目标至关重要,患者支持计划(PSP)可能会改善这些情况。COACH计划于2015年启动,旨在为处方甘精胰岛素300 U/mL(Gla-300)的糖尿病患者提供支持。本研究的目的是评估该计划对2型糖尿病患者治疗持续性和依从性的影响。

研究设计与方法

进行了一项为期12个月的回顾性分析,以比较积极参与COACH PSP的接受Gla-300治疗的患者与未参加COACH的患者的治疗依从性和持续性,使用2016年2月1日至2016年7月31日识别期内的COACH参与情况和理赔数据。COACH组(n = 544)和非COACH组(n = 544)参与者在选定的基线特征上进行匹配。

结果

在控制临床混杂因素后的12个月随访期间,COACH参与者比非COACH患者更有可能坚持使用Gla-300(68.0%对61.4%,p = 0.0201;OR:1.81,p = 0.0002)且持续使用(48.5%对42.1%,p = 0.0309;停药HR:0.60,p < 0.0001)。此外,初治胰岛素患者和基础胰岛素转换者COACH参与者分别比非COACH患者更有可能坚持使用(OR:2.25,p = 0.0082和OR:1.662,p = 0.0364)且持续使用(停药HR:0.53,p = 0.0054和HR:0.67,p = 0.0492)。最后,参与度较高的COACH参与者表现出更好的持续性。

结论

这些数据表明,参与COACH PSP与2型糖尿病患者对Gla-300的持续性和依从性改善相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/622a/6307592/7b1ef8330ece/bmjdrc-2018-000593f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/622a/6307592/034b5dbf31f3/bmjdrc-2018-000593f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/622a/6307592/7b1ef8330ece/bmjdrc-2018-000593f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/622a/6307592/034b5dbf31f3/bmjdrc-2018-000593f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/622a/6307592/7b1ef8330ece/bmjdrc-2018-000593f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of a structured patient support program on adherence and persistence in basal insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes.结构化患者支持项目对2型糖尿病基础胰岛素治疗依从性和持续性的影响。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018 Dec 22;6(1):e000593. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000593. eCollection 2018.
2
Improved Treatment Engagement Among Patients with Diabetes Treated with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Who Participated in the COACH Support Program.参与COACH支持项目的接受甘精胰岛素300 U/mL治疗的糖尿病患者治疗参与度得到改善。
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Oct;9(5):2143-2153. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0501-6. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
3
Impact of the Adalimumab Patient Support Program's Care Coach Calls on Persistence and Adherence in Canada: An Observational Retrospective Cohort Study.阿达木单抗患者支持计划的护理指导员对加拿大患者坚持治疗和用药依从性的影响:一项观察性回顾性队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2018 Mar;40(3):415-429.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
4
Impact of initiating insulin glargine disposable pen versus vial/syringe on real-world glycemic outcomes and persistence among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a large managed care plan: a claims database analysis.在一个大型管理式医疗计划中,起始使用甘精胰岛素一次性笔与小瓶/注射器对2型糖尿病患者实际血糖控制效果和治疗持续性的影响:一项索赔数据库分析
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Sep;16(9):567-75. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0312. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
5
Higher Rates of Persistence and Adherence in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Initiating Once-Weekly vs Daily Injectable Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in US Clinical Practice (STAY Study).美国临床实践中(STAY研究),起始使用每周一次与每日一次注射用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的2型糖尿病患者的持续治疗率和依从率更高。
Diabetes Ther. 2022 Jan;13(1):175-187. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01189-6. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
6
Real-world outcomes of US employees with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin: a comparative retrospective database study.美国使用甘精胰岛素或中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病的员工的真实世界结局:一项比较性回顾性数据库研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 30;3(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002348. Print 2013.
7
Adherence and persistence to a regimen of basal insulin in a pre-filled pen compared to vial/syringe in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.与胰岛素初治 2 型糖尿病患者使用胰岛素瓶/注射器相比,预填充笔中基础胰岛素治疗方案的依从性和持久性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Sep;27(9):1709-17. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.598500. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
8
Characteristics Relating to Adherence and Persistence to Basal Insulin Regimens Among Elderly Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Pre-Filled Pens versus Vials/Syringes.2型糖尿病初治老年患者中与基础胰岛素治疗方案依从性和持续性相关的特征:预填充笔式注射器与小瓶/注射器的比较
Adv Ther. 2015 Dec;32(12):1206-21. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0266-5. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
9
Descriptive study of a clinical and educational telemedicine intervention in patients with diabetes receiving glargine 300 U/ml (Toujeo) in Spain: results of the T-Coach programme.西班牙对接受300 U/ml甘精胰岛素(Toujeo)治疗的糖尿病患者进行临床和教育远程医疗干预的描述性研究:T-Coach项目的结果
Drugs Context. 2023 May 24;12. doi: 10.7573/dic.2023-1-1. eCollection 2023.
10
Real world outcomes of adding rapid-acting insulin versus switching to analog premix insulin among US patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin glargine.在美国接受甘精胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,加用速效胰岛素与换用预混胰岛素类似物的真实世界转归。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Sep 19;7:951-60. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S49287. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Data Mining to Identify the Right Interventions for the Right Patient for Heart Failure: A Real-World Study.数据挖掘以确定针对心力衰竭患者的正确干预措施:一项真实世界研究。
Healthc Inform Res. 2025 Jan;31(1):66-87. doi: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.66. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Assessment of basal insulin adherence using 2 methodologies among Texas Medicaid enrollees with type 2 diabetes.采用 2 种方法评估德克萨斯州医疗补助计划 2 型糖尿病患者的基础胰岛素依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Nov;26(11):1434-1444. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.11.1434.
3
Predictive models of medication non-adherence risks of patients with T2D based on multiple machine learning algorithms.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimated Cost Savings: Everyone With Diabetes Counts (EDC) Program.估计成本节约:“关注每一位糖尿病患者”(EDC)项目
Fam Community Health. 2018 Jul/Sep;41(3):185-193. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000189.
2
The efficacy of telehealth delivered educational approaches for patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review.远程医疗教育方法在慢性病患者中的疗效:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1310-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
3
Efficacy of a telephone-based intervention among patients with type-2 diabetes; a randomized controlled trial in pharmacy practice.
基于多种机器学习算法的 T2D 患者药物不依从风险预测模型。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001055.
基于电话干预对2型糖尿病患者的疗效:药学实践中的一项随机对照试验
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Apr;40(2):345-353. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0593-0. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
Mobile Diabetes Intervention Study of Patient Engagement and Impact on Blood Glucose: Mixed Methods Analysis.患者参与度及对血糖影响的移动糖尿病干预研究:混合方法分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Feb 2;6(2):e31. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9265.
5
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Program in a Primary Care Setting Within an Integrated Health Care System.在综合性医疗保健系统中,评估初级保健环境下药师管理的糖尿病项目。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):114-122. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.114.
6
2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.2017 年版《国家糖尿病患者自我管理教育和支持标准》。
Diabetes Educ. 2018 Feb;44(1):35-50. doi: 10.1177/0145721718754797.
7
The Diabetes Management Education Program in South Texas: An Economic and Clinical Impact Analysis.南德克萨斯糖尿病管理教育项目:经济与临床影响分析
Front Public Health. 2017 Dec 18;5:345. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00345. eCollection 2017.
8
Achievement of guideline targets for blood pressure, lipid, and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.实现 2 型糖尿病患者血压、血脂和血糖控制目标:一项荟萃分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;137:137-148. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.12.004. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
9
Pharmacist-Led Self-management Interventions to Improve Diabetes Outcomes. A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.药师主导的自我管理干预措施改善糖尿病结局:一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Dec 14;8:891. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00891. eCollection 2017.
10
Impact of a structured multicomponent educational intervention program on metabolic control of patients with type 2 diabetes.结构化多组分教育干预方案对 2 型糖尿病患者代谢控制的影响。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2017 Dec 15;17(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12902-017-0222-2.