Section of Science, Nord University, Levanger, Norway.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0210151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210151. eCollection 2019.
Nest predation studies often use artificial nests to secure sample sizes and nest distribution patterns that allow empirically testing differences in predation rates between ecological units of interest. These studies rely on the assumption that natural and artificial nests experience similar or consistent relative predation rates across ecological gradients. As this assumption may depend on several factors (for example differences in predator community, nest construction, parental care patterns), it is important to test whether artificial nests provide adequate and comparable estimates of predation rates to natural nests. In this study, we compare predation rates of above-ground natural open-cup nests, artificial nests and natural nests with artificial eggs along a forest gradient from edge to interior (interior, transition zone and edge) and within two nest visibility classes (visible and concealed). Our aim was to determine whether nest structure affects comparability between nest types along these ecological gradients in boreal forests. Our results indicated important contributions of nest type, nest visibility and location along the forest edge-interior gradient, but no variable had strong significant effects on predation rates, except exposure time that showed lower predation rates at longer exposure times. Predation rates in visible and concealed nests remained similar for all nest types, but not along the forest edge-interior gradient. Here, artificial nests showed much lower predation rates than natural nests, whereas natural nests with artificial eggs tended to have higher predation rates than natural nests. We conclude that artificial nests in boreal forests represent an adequate measure of relative nest predation risk in open-cup natural nests along some ecological gradients, but results on predation rates along forest edge-interior gradients obtained from artificial nests should be interpreted with care.
巢捕食研究通常使用人工巢来确保样本量和巢分布模式,从而可以对感兴趣的生态单位之间的捕食率差异进行经验测试。这些研究依赖于这样一个假设,即自然和人工巢在生态梯度上经历相似或一致的相对捕食率。由于这个假设可能取决于几个因素(例如捕食者群落、巢结构、亲代育雏模式的差异),因此重要的是要测试人工巢是否能够提供与自然巢相当的捕食率估计值。在这项研究中,我们比较了地上自然敞口杯巢、人工巢和带有人工蛋的自然巢在森林梯度(从边缘到内部[内部、过渡区和边缘])以及两个巢可见度类别(可见和隐藏)上的捕食率。我们的目的是确定巢结构是否会影响在北方森林的这些生态梯度上巢类型之间的可比性。我们的研究结果表明,巢结构、巢可见度和巢在森林边缘-内部梯度上的位置对捕食率有重要影响,但除了暴露时间外,没有一个变量对捕食率有很强的显著影响,暴露时间越长,捕食率越低。在所有巢类型中,可见巢和隐藏巢的捕食率仍然相似,但在森林边缘-内部梯度上则不然。在这里,人工巢的捕食率远低于自然巢,而带有人工蛋的自然巢的捕食率往往高于自然巢。我们的结论是,北方森林中的人工巢是衡量敞口自然巢在某些生态梯度上相对巢捕食风险的一个合适指标,但从人工巢获得的森林边缘-内部梯度上的捕食率结果应该谨慎解释。