Suppr超能文献

重新探讨一个老问题:在农田景观中,哪些捕食者会捕食地面筑巢鸟类的卵?

Revisiting an old question: Which predators eat eggs of ground-nesting birds in farmland landscapes?

机构信息

Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372, CNRS and La Rochelle Université, F-79360 Beauvoir-sur- Niort, France; LETG-Angers, UMR 6554, CNRS, Université d'Angers, 49045 Angers, France.

LETG-Angers, UMR 6554, CNRS, Université d'Angers, 49045 Angers, France; REHABS International Research Laboratory, CNRS-Université Lyon 1-Nelson Mandela University, George Campus, Madiba drive, 6531 George, South Africa.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 20;744:140895. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140895. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

Abstract

Nest predation is a major cause of reproductive failure in birds, but predator identity often remains unknown. Additionally, although corvids are considered major nest predators in farmland landscapes, whether breeders or floaters are involved remains contentious. In this study, we aimed to identify nest predators using artificial nests, and test whether territorial or non-breeders carrion crow (Corvus corone) and Eurasian magpie (Pica pica) were most likely involved. We set up an experiment with artificial ground nests (n = 1429) in farmland landscapes of western France, and assessed how different combinations of egg size and egg material (small plasticine egg, large plasticine egg, quail and natural hen eggs) might influence predation rates and predator species involved. Nest predators were identified using remotely triggered cameras and marks left in plasticine eggs. Corvids were by far the predators most involved (almost 80% of all predation events), independent of egg type. Carrion crows alone were involved in 60% of cases. Probability of predation increased with egg size, and predation rate was higher for natural than for artificial eggs, suggesting that, in addition to egg size, predators might perceive plasticine and natural eggs differently. Predation rates of artificial nests by corvids were related significantly to corvid abundance, and far more to breeder than floater abundances, for both carrion crows and magpies. This study emphasizes the importance of identifying predators at species level, and considering their social status when assessing corvid abundance impact on prey population dynamics. Combining camera traps and plasticine eggs can achieve this objective. Given the high predation rate by carrion crows, a better understanding of landscape-mediated changes in predator diet seems mandatory to design mitigation schemes able to confront ecological challenges raised by generalist predators.

摘要

巢捕食是鸟类繁殖失败的主要原因,但捕食者的身份往往未知。此外,尽管鸦科被认为是农田景观中的主要巢捕食者,但繁殖者还是流浪者参与其中仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们旨在使用人工巢来识别巢捕食者,并测试领地性或非繁殖性的欧亚椋鸟(Corvus corone)和喜鹊(Pica pica)是否最有可能参与其中。我们在法国西部的农田景观中进行了一项带有人工地面巢(n=1429)的实验,并评估了不同大小和材料的鸡蛋组合(小橡皮泥蛋、大橡皮泥蛋、鹌鹑蛋和天然鸡蛋)如何影响捕食率和涉及的捕食者种类。通过远程触发的相机和橡皮泥蛋上留下的痕迹来识别巢捕食者。鸦科是迄今为止最主要的捕食者(几乎占所有捕食事件的 80%),与蛋的类型无关。仅欧亚椋鸟就参与了 60%的案例。捕食的可能性随着蛋的大小而增加,并且天然蛋的捕食率高于人工蛋,这表明除了蛋的大小之外,捕食者可能对橡皮泥和天然蛋有不同的感知。鸦科对人工巢的捕食率与鸦科的数量显著相关,与流浪者的数量相比,与繁殖者的数量的相关性更高,无论是欧亚椋鸟还是喜鹊都是如此。这项研究强调了在评估鸦科对猎物种群动态的影响时,必须确定捕食者的物种水平,并考虑它们的社会地位。结合相机陷阱和橡皮泥蛋可以实现这一目标。鉴于欧亚椋鸟的高捕食率,似乎有必要更好地了解景观介导的捕食者饮食变化,以设计能够应对一般捕食者带来的生态挑战的缓解方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验