Bae Ji Young, Kwak Tae Yong, Kim Jong Won, Woo Chul Ho, Kim Kwang Min
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2009 Jul;57(1):26-31. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2009.57.1.26.
Severe burn patients often have a difficult airway. Tracheal intubation can be conducted safely in patients in a stable hemodynamic condition using a propofol in conjunction with remifentanil without employing muscle relaxant. However, no studies have been conducted to date to evaluate intubation of severe burn patients. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the condition of tracheal intubation with propofol and varying doses of remifentanil without muscle relaxants in severe burn patients.
Eighty severe burn patients were divided into four groups at random. Anesthesia was intravenously induced by continuous infusion of propofol (4 microgram/ml of effect site concentration)and slowly injected remifentanil. Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 received 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 microgram/kg of remifentanil, respectively. Ninety seconds after the administration of remifentanil, tracheal intubation was attempted. We used a scoring system in which jaw relaxation, the state when laryngoscopy was inserted, vocal cord opening, cough, limb movement, and difficulty with laryngoscopy were divided into < or = 2 (acceptable) or > or = 3 (not acceptable). In addition, the hemodynamic changes were measured at baseline, before intubation, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min after intubation.
Clinically acceptable intubating conditions were observed in 35%, 40%, 55%, and 70% of the patients in groups 1-4, respectively. The mean arterial pressure and heart rate decreased immediately before intubation in all groups. One patient was treated for bradycardia however, no patients manifested hypotension.
Propofol and slowly injected remifentanil (2.5 microgram/kg) without muscle relaxant can provide clinically acceptable intubating conditions and stable hemodynamic conditions in major burn patients. However, further studies should be conducted to evaluate the effects of increased doses of remifentanil.
重度烧伤患者常伴有气道困难。在血流动力学稳定的患者中,使用丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼可在不使用肌肉松弛剂的情况下安全地进行气管插管。然而,迄今为止尚未有研究评估重度烧伤患者的插管情况。因此,本研究旨在评估在不使用肌肉松弛剂的情况下,丙泊酚联合不同剂量瑞芬太尼用于重度烧伤患者气管插管的情况。
80例重度烧伤患者随机分为四组。通过持续输注丙泊酚(效应室浓度为4微克/毫升)并缓慢注射瑞芬太尼进行静脉诱导麻醉。第1、2、3和4组分别接受1、1.5、2和2.5微克/千克的瑞芬太尼。给予瑞芬太尼90秒后尝试进行气管插管。我们使用了一种评分系统,其中下颌松弛度、喉镜插入时的状态、声带张开度、咳嗽、肢体运动以及喉镜检查的难度分为≤2(可接受)或≥3(不可接受)。此外,在基线、插管前以及插管后1、2、3、4和5分钟测量血流动力学变化。
第1 - 4组分别有35%、40%、55%和70%的患者观察到临床上可接受的插管条件。所有组在插管前即刻平均动脉压和心率均下降。有1例患者因心动过缓接受治疗,然而,没有患者出现低血压。
不使用肌肉松弛剂,丙泊酚联合缓慢注射瑞芬太尼(2.5微克/千克)可为重度烧伤患者提供临床上可接受的插管条件和稳定的血流动力学条件。然而,应进一步开展研究以评估增加瑞芬太尼剂量的效果。