Suppr超能文献

在丙泊酚靶控输注期间,比较不同效应室浓度瑞芬太尼在无肌松药情况下气管插管的插管条件及血流动力学反应。

Comparison of intubating conditions and hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with different effect-site concentrations of remifentanil without muscle relaxants during target-controlled infusion of propofol.

作者信息

Kim Seok Jai, Yoo Kyung Yeon, Park Byoung Yun, Kim Woong Mo, Jeong Cheol Won

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2009 Jul;57(1):13-19. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2009.57.1.13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared the effects of different remifentanil effect-site concentrations on intubating conditions, and cardiovascular and bispectral index score (BIS) responses to intubation at a fixed effect-site concentration of propofol without muscle relaxants.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: remifentanil 2 (group R2, n = 22), 4 (group R4, n = 21), or 6 ng/ml (group R6, n = 21). Anesthesia was induced using target-controlled infusion of propofol 5 microgram/ml and each concentration of remifentanil. Laryngoscopy and intubation was attempted at 2.5 min following induction. Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good or poor using a standard scoring system. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and BIS values were assessed.

RESULTS

Excellent or good intubating conditions were obtained in 91% of group R4 and 95% of R6, both of which are higher compared with 32% of R2 (P < 0.01). MAP and HR decreased significantly after induction in all groups. After intubation, they recovered to baseline value in group R2 and R4 but were significantly less than baseline values in R6. BIS response to intubation was attenuated in group R4 and R6 but not R2. Hypotension was more frequent in group R6 than R2.

CONCLUSIONS

Remifentanil target concentrations of 4 or 6 ng/ml combined with 5 microgram/ml propofol provided good or excellent conditions for tracheal intubation and prevented cardiovascular and BIS response during induction without muscle relaxants. However, the use of 6 ng/ml dose was associated with frequent occurrence of hypotension and bradycardia requiring treatment.

摘要

背景

我们比较了不同瑞芬太尼效应室浓度对插管条件以及在丙泊酚效应室浓度固定且未使用肌肉松弛剂的情况下插管时心血管反应和脑电双频指数(BIS)评分的影响。

方法

64例患者被随机分为三组之一:瑞芬太尼2 ng/ml(R2组,n = 22)、4 ng/ml(R4组,n = 21)或6 ng/ml(R6组,n = 21)。采用靶控输注5微克/毫升丙泊酚和各浓度瑞芬太尼诱导麻醉。诱导后2.5分钟尝试喉镜检查和插管。使用标准评分系统将插管条件评估为优、良或差。评估平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)和BIS值。

结果

R4组91%和R6组95%获得了优或良的插管条件,两者均高于R2组的32%(P < 0.01)。所有组诱导后MAP和HR均显著下降。插管后,R2组和R4组恢复至基线值,但R6组显著低于基线值。R4组和R6组对插管的BIS反应减弱,但R2组未减弱。R6组低血压比R2组更常见。

结论

4或6 ng/ml的瑞芬太尼靶浓度与5微克/毫升丙泊酚联合使用可为气管插管提供良好或优的条件,并在未使用肌肉松弛剂的诱导过程中预防心血管和BIS反应。然而,使用6 ng/ml剂量与需要治疗的低血压和心动过缓频繁发生有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验