Suppr超能文献

CSF 炎症标志物在革兰阳性与革兰阴性分流感染中有所不同。

CSF inflammatory markers differ in gram-positive versus gram-negative shunt infections.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982162 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-2162, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Neuroinflammation. 2019 Jan 9;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1395-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt placement is frequently complicated by bacterial infection. Shunt infection diagnosis relies on bacterial culture of CSF which can often produce false-negative results. Negative cultures present a conundrum for physicians as they are left to rely on other CSF indices, which can be unremarkable. New methods are needed to swiftly and accurately diagnose shunt infections. CSF chemokines and cytokines may prove useful as diagnostic biomarkers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of systemic and CSF biomarkers for identification of CSF shunt infection.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of children with culture-confirmed CSF shunt infection at Children's Hospital and Medical Center from July 2013 to December 2015. CSF cytokine analysis was performed for those patients with CSF in frozen storage from the same sample that was used for diagnostic culture.

RESULTS

A total of 12 infections were included in this study. Patients with shunt infection had a median C-reactive protein (CRP) of 18.25 mg/dL. Median peripheral white blood cell count was 15.53 × 10 cells/mL. Those with shunt infection had a median CSF WBC of 332 cells/mL, median CSF protein level of 406 mg/dL, and median CSF glucose of 35.5 mg/dL. An interesting trend was observed with gram-positive infections having higher levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-10 as well as IL-17A and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) compared to gram-negative infections, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conversely, gram-negative infections displayed higher levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, fractalkine (CXCL), chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), and chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3), although again these were not significantly different. CSF from gram-positive and gram-negative shunt infections had similar levels of interferon gamma (INF-γ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), IL-6, and IL-8.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study is the first to characterize the CSF cytokine profile in patients with CSF shunt infection and supports the distinction of chemokine and cytokine profiles between gram-negative and gram-positive infections. Additionally, it demonstrates the potential of CSF chemokines and cytokines as biomarkers for the diagnosis of shunt infection.

摘要

背景

脑脊髓液(CSF)分流管放置后常并发细菌感染。分流感染的诊断依赖于 CSF 的细菌培养,但该方法经常导致假阴性结果。阴性培养结果给医生带来了难题,因为他们只能依靠其他可能无明显异常的 CSF 指标。需要新的方法来快速、准确地诊断分流感染。CSF 趋化因子和细胞因子可能成为有用的诊断生物标志物。本研究旨在评估全身性和 CSF 生物标志物在识别 CSF 分流感染中的潜力。

方法

我们对 2013 年 7 月至 2015 年 12 月在儿童医院和医疗中心经培养证实的 CSF 分流感染患儿进行了回顾性图表审查。对具有 CSF 冷冻储存的患者进行 CSF 细胞因子分析,这些样本来自用于诊断培养的相同样本。

结果

本研究共纳入 12 例感染。分流感染患者的 C 反应蛋白(CRP)中位数为 18.25mg/dL。外周白细胞计数中位数为 15.53×10 个细胞/mL。分流感染患者的 CSF WBC 中位数为 332 个细胞/mL,CSF 蛋白水平中位数为 406mg/dL,CSF 葡萄糖中位数为 35.5mg/dL。有趣的是,与革兰氏阴性感染相比,革兰氏阳性感染的抗炎细胞因子白细胞介素(IL)-10、IL-17A 和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平更高,尽管这些差异没有达到统计学意义。相反,革兰氏阴性感染显示促炎细胞因子 IL-1β、趋化因子(CXCL)配体 2(CCL2)和趋化因子配体 3(CCL3)水平更高,尽管这些差异也无统计学意义。CSF 中的革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性分流感染具有相似水平的干扰素 γ(INF-γ)、肿瘤坏死因子 α(TNF-α)、IL-6 和 IL-8。

结论

本研究首次描述了 CSF 分流感染患者的 CSF 细胞因子谱,支持区分革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性感染的趋化因子和细胞因子谱。此外,它还证明了 CSF 趋化因子和细胞因子作为分流感染诊断标志物的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27b4/6325818/3eb6269b97f0/12974_2019_1395_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验