• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知面部情感歧义:青少年和成年人的行为和神经比较。

Perceiving facial affective ambiguity: A behavioral and neural comparison of adolescents and adults.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech.

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

出版信息

Emotion. 2020 Apr;20(3):501-506. doi: 10.1037/emo0000558. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1037/emo0000558
PMID:30628818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6620165/
Abstract

The current study examined perceptual differences between adults and youth in perceiving ambiguous facial expressions. We estimated individuals' internal representation for facial expressions and compared it between age groups (adolescents: N = 108, Mage = 13.04 years, 43.52% female; adults: N = 81, Mage = 31.54, 65.43% female). We found that adolescents' perceptual representation for facial emotion is broader than that of adults', such that adolescents experience more difficulty in identifying subtle configurational differences of facial expressions. At the neural level, perceptual uncertainty in face-selective regions (e.g., fusiform face area, occipital face area) were significantly higher for adolescents than for adults, suggesting that adolescents' brains more similarly represent lower intensity emotional faces than do adults'. Our results provide evidence for age-related differences concerning psychophysical differences in perceptual representation of emotional faces at the neural and behavioral level. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究考察了成人和青少年在感知模糊面部表情时的知觉差异。我们估计了个体对面部表情的内部表现,并在年龄组之间进行了比较(青少年:N = 108,Mage = 13.04 岁,43.52%女性;成年人:N = 81,Mage = 31.54,65.43%女性)。我们发现,青少年对面部表情的感知表现比成年人更广泛,因此青少年在识别面部表情细微的结构差异方面更困难。在神经水平上,面部选择区域(例如梭状回面部区、枕叶面部区)的感知不确定性在青少年中显著高于成年人,这表明青少年的大脑更相似地代表了比成年人更低强度的情绪面孔。我们的研究结果为神经和行为水平上情绪面孔知觉表现的心理物理差异的年龄相关差异提供了证据。

相似文献

1
Perceiving facial affective ambiguity: A behavioral and neural comparison of adolescents and adults.感知面部情感歧义:青少年和成年人的行为和神经比较。
Emotion. 2020 Apr;20(3):501-506. doi: 10.1037/emo0000558. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
2
Adolescents and young adults differ in their neural response to and recognition of adolescent and adult emotional faces.青少年和年轻人在对青少年和成人情绪面孔的神经反应和识别上存在差异。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Sep;59(9):e14060. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14060. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
3
Gaze patterns to emotional faces throughout the adult lifespan.成年期全程的情绪面孔注视模式。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Nov;35(7):981-992. doi: 10.1037/pag0000571. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
4
Perceiving Dynamic Emotions Expressed Simultaneously in the Face and Body Minimizes Perceptual Differences Between Young and Older Adults.感知面部和身体同时表达的动态情绪会减少年轻和年长成年人之间的感知差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Jan 12;77(1):84-93. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab064.
5
Emotion identification across adulthood using the Dynamic FACES database of emotional expressions in younger, middle aged, and older adults.使用年轻人、中年人和老年人的动态 FACES 情感表达数据库进行整个成年期的情绪识别。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Mar;33(2):245-257. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1445981. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
6
Adult age differences in the interpretation of surprised facial expressions.成年人在解读惊讶面部表情上的年龄差异。
Emotion. 2017 Mar;17(2):191-195. doi: 10.1037/emo0000234. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
7
Bidirectional contextual influence between faces and bodies in emotion perception.情绪感知中面孔和身体之间的双向语境影响。
Emotion. 2020 Oct;20(7):1154-1164. doi: 10.1037/emo0000619. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
Investigating the effects of perinatal status and gender on adults' responses to infant and adult facial emotion.探讨围产期状况和性别对成年人对婴儿和成人面部情绪反应的影响。
Emotion. 2021 Mar;21(2):337-349. doi: 10.1037/emo0000698. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
Positivity effects in older adults' perception of facial emotion: the role of future time perspective.老年人对面部情绪感知的积极影响:未来时间透视的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Mar;67(2):150-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr079. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
10
Similar representations of emotions across faces and voices.面部表情和声音中情感的相似表现。
Emotion. 2017 Sep;17(6):912-937. doi: 10.1037/emo0000282. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Development of Ambiguity Processing Is Explained by an Inverted U-Shaped Curve.歧义处理的发展由一条倒U形曲线来解释。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 16;14(9):826. doi: 10.3390/bs14090826.
2
Neural response to vocal emotional intensity in youth.年轻人对声音情感强度的神经反应。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Apr;25(2):454-470. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01224-6. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
Differentiating neural sensitivity and bias during face-emotion processing in youth: a computational approach.区分青少年面部情绪处理过程中的神经敏感性和偏差:一种计算方法。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Jun 13;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae034.
4
A Computational Model Reveals Learning Dynamics During Interpretation Bias Training With Clinical Applications.计算模型揭示了在临床应用中进行解释偏差训练时的学习动态。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Oct;8(10):1033-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
5
Longitudinal change in neural response to vocal emotion in adolescence.青少年时期对声音情绪的神经反应的纵向变化。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Oct 3;17(10):890-903. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsac021.
6
Developmental differences in the visual processing of emotionally ambiguous neutral faces based on perceived valence.基于感知效价的情绪中性面孔视觉加工的发展差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 16;16(8):e0256109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256109. eCollection 2021.
7
Apples to apples? Neural correlates of emotion regulation differences between high- and low-risk adolescents.苹果对苹果?高风险和低风险青少年情绪调节差异的神经相关性。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Aug 31;14(8):827-836. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz063.
8
Links between adolescent bullying and neural activation to viewing social exclusion.青少年欺凌行为与观看社会排斥时的神经激活之间的联系。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Dec;19(6):1467-1478. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00739-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Love flows downstream: mothers' and children's neural representation similarity in perceiving distress of self and family.爱向下流动:母亲和孩子在感知自身和家庭痛苦时的神经代表性相似。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Dec 1;12(12):1916-1927. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx125.
2
The human amygdala parametrically encodes the intensity of specific facial emotions and their categorical ambiguity.人类杏仁核参数化编码特定面部情绪的强度及其类别模糊性。
Nat Commun. 2017 Apr 21;8:14821. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14821.
3
What develops during emotional development? A component process approach to identifying sources of psychopathology risk in adolescence.在情绪发展过程中会发生什么?一种识别青少年心理病理学风险来源的成分过程方法。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015 Dec;17(4):403-10. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.4/kmclaughlin.
4
Working memory capacity is associated with optimal adaptation of response bias to perceptual sensitivity in emotion perception.工作记忆容量与情绪感知中反应偏差对感知敏感性的最佳适应相关。
Emotion. 2016 Mar;16(2):155-63. doi: 10.1037/emo0000111. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
5
Developmental differences in the neural mechanisms of facial emotion labeling.面部情绪识别神经机制的发育差异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Jan;11(1):172-81. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv101. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
6
Seeing the world through non rose-colored glasses: anxiety and the amygdala response to blended expressions.以非玫瑰色眼镜看世界:焦虑与杏仁核对混合表情的反应。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 27;9:152. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00152. eCollection 2015.
7
A Bayesian approach to person perception.一种用于人物感知的贝叶斯方法。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
8
Cone of direct gaze as a marker of social anxiety in males.直接注视圆锥体作为男性社交焦虑的标志物。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Nov 30;210(1):193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
9
Gaze categorization under uncertainty: psychophysics and modeling.不确定性下的注视分类:心理物理学与建模
J Vis. 2013 Apr 22;13(5):18. doi: 10.1167/13.5.18.
10
Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches.用非正态数据检验相关性的显著性:皮尔逊、斯皮尔曼、转换和重抽样方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):399-417. doi: 10.1037/a0028087. Epub 2012 May 7.