Suppr超能文献

二甲双胍剂量滴定与加用另一种抗高血糖药物治疗二甲双胍单药治疗失败的 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparative Effectiveness of Metformin Dosage Uptitration Versus Adding Another Antihyperglycemic Medication on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Failing Initial Metformin Monotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina.

Aetna, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Popul Health Manag. 2019 Oct;22(5):457-463. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0158. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

Abstract

Metformin is recommended as first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D). A disadvantage of metformin is the possibility of gastrointestinal adverse effects in some patients. Many T2D patients are not able to achieve/maintain glycemic control from initial metformin treatment and receive treatment intensification by means of metformin dosage uptitration or addition of a T2D drug. This retrospective study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of these 2 treatment intensification strategies. The study cohort included T2D patients at a US integrated health care system who: were initiated on metformin monotherapy (MM) during January 2009 - September 2013; had an uncontrolled HbA1c (≥7%) after at least 90 days of MM; and received metformin dosage uptitration or an additional T2D medication within 6 months of the uncontrolled HbA1c reading. Statistical techniques included Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. The study cohort included 1167 patients, 52.4% male and 65.1% white, with a mean age of 55.3 (±11.9) years. Of these, 49.1% received metformin dosage uptitration and 50.9% received an additional T2D medication. Metformin dosage uptitration was as effective as adding another T2D medication with the probability of not achieving glycemic control ( = 0.599) and rate of glycemic control (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval = 0.98-1.68) within 6 months of intensification not significantly different between the 2 groups. Metformin dosage uptitration could be a preferable initial intensification strategy in patients failing initial MM unless there is a concern for gastrointestinal adverse effects, in which case adding a T2D medication might be preferable.

摘要

二甲双胍被推荐作为 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的一线治疗药物。二甲双胍的一个缺点是,在一些患者中可能会出现胃肠道不良反应。许多 T2D 患者无法从初始的二甲双胍治疗中实现/维持血糖控制,因此需要通过增加二甲双胍剂量或添加 T2D 药物来进行治疗强化。这项回顾性研究评估了这两种治疗强化策略的相对效果。研究队列包括在美国综合医疗保健系统中接受治疗的 T2D 患者,这些患者符合以下条件:在 2009 年 1 月至 2013 年 9 月期间接受二甲双胍单药治疗(MM);在接受 MM 至少 90 天后,HbA1c 仍未得到控制(≥7%);并且在 HbA1c 读数未得到控制后 6 个月内,增加了二甲双胍剂量或添加了另一种 T2D 药物。统计技术包括 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 比例风险回归。研究队列包括 1167 名患者,其中 52.4%为男性,65.1%为白人,平均年龄为 55.3(±11.9)岁。其中,49.1%接受了二甲双胍剂量增加,50.9%接受了另一种 T2D 药物治疗。在 6 个月的强化治疗期间,不达标( = 0.599)和血糖控制率(调整后的危险比=1.28,95%置信区间=0.98-1.68)方面,增加二甲双胍剂量与添加另一种 T2D 药物一样有效,两组之间无显著差异。除非存在胃肠道不良反应的担忧,否则在初始 MM 治疗失败的患者中,增加二甲双胍剂量可能是一种更优的初始强化策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验