• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴道穹窿脱垂围手术期结局的全国当代分析:微创骶棘韧带固定术与非网片阴道手术的比较

A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.

作者信息

Linder Brian J, Gershman Boris, Bews Katherine A, Glasgow Amy E, Occhino John A

机构信息

From the Departments of Urology.

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep/Oct;25(5):342-346. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000678.

DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000678
PMID:30628947
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative morbidity of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) and nonmesh apical vaginal surgeries for repair of vaginal vault prolapse using data from a contemporary nationwide cohort.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify women who underwent apical prolapse surgery via vaginal approach or MISC from 2010 to 2016. Those undergoing concomitant hysterectomy or transvaginal mesh placement were excluded. Associations of surgical approach with 30-day complications, prolonged hospitalization, and reoperation were evaluated using logistic regression. Readmission within 30 days was calculated using the person-years method and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Overall, 6390 women underwent surgery, including 3852 (60%) via vaginal approach and 2538 (40%) via MISC. Patients undergoing MISC were younger (P < 0.0001) and less likely to have hypertension (P = 0.04) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.008), with lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (P < 0.0001) and higher preoperative hematocrit (P = 0.009). The MISC cohort had a lower unadjusted rates of minor complications (3.9% vs 5.6%; P = 0.004), urinary tract infection (3.3% vs 4.8%; P = 0.004), and prolonged hospitalization (5.2% vs 7.9%; P < 0.0001), with a higher rate of nephrologic (P = 0.01) complications. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant associations of MISC with the risk of 30-day complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-2.51; P = 0.11), prolonged hospitalization (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.21; P = 0.72), readmission (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.71-1.49;P = 0.88), or reoperation (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.57-1.60; P = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy is associated with similar rates of 30-day complications, prolonged hospitalization, readmission, and reoperation compared with nonmesh vaginal surgeries for apical prolapse.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用当代全国队列的数据,比较微创骶骨阴道固定术(MISC)和非网片顶端阴道手术修复阴道穹窿脱垂的围手术期发病率。

方法

使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库,识别2010年至2016年期间通过阴道途径或MISC进行顶端脱垂手术的女性。排除同时进行子宫切除术或经阴道放置网片的患者。使用逻辑回归评估手术方式与30天并发症、延长住院时间和再次手术之间的关联。采用人年法和Cox比例风险模型计算30天内再入院率。

结果

总体而言,6390名女性接受了手术,其中3852名(60%)通过阴道途径,2538名(40%)通过MISC。接受MISC的患者更年轻(P<0.0001),患高血压(P=0.04)或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(P=0.008)的可能性更小,美国麻醉医师协会评分更低(P<0.0001),术前血细胞比容更高(P=0.009)。MISC队列的轻微并发症(3.9%对5.6%;P=0.004)、尿路感染(3.3%对4.8%;P=0.004)和延长住院时间(5.2%对7.9%;P<0.0001)的未调整发生率较低,肾病并发症发生率较高(P=0.01)。在多变量分析中,MISC与30天并发症风险(比值比[OR],1.51;95%置信区间[CI],0.92-2.51;P=0.11)、延长住院时间(OR,0.96;95%CI,0.76-1.21;P=0.72)、再入院(风险比1.03;95%CI,0.71-1.49;P=0.88)或再次手术(OR,0.95;95%CI,0.57-1.60;P=0.86)之间无显著关联。

结论

与非网片阴道顶端脱垂手术相比,微创骶骨阴道固定术的30天并发症、延长住院时间、再入院和再次手术发生率相似。

相似文献

1
A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.阴道穹窿脱垂围手术期结局的全国当代分析:微创骶棘韧带固定术与非网片阴道手术的比较
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep/Oct;25(5):342-346. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000678.
2
Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.微创骶骨阴道固定术与阴道网片修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的围手术期并发症:国家多机构数据集分析。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;27(2):72-77. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000738.
3
A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.全国范围内经腹与经阴式骶骨阴道固定术围手术期结局的对比分析。
J Urol. 2018 Oct;200(4):862-867. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.131. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
4
Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.不同途径的盆腔器官脱垂修复术后静脉血栓栓塞事件的发生率和危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):268.e1-268.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
Complications After Vaginal Vault Suspension Versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Elevated Body Mass Index: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Data From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.体质量指数升高的女性中行阴道穹窿悬吊术与微创骶骨阴道固定术的术后并发症:一项利用国家外科质量改进计划数据库数据的回顾性队列研究。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jun 1;28(6):391-396. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001146. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse.阴道顶端脱垂重建手术中的种族和民族差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):405.e1-405.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.经阴道骶骨阴道固定术和阴道顶端盆腔器官脱垂手术后的再入院和急诊就诊。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):552.e1-552.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
8
A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.骶棘韧带固定术、子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术和微创骶骨阴道固定术的围手术期结局、再入院和再次手术比较。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Mar 1;27(3):133-139. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000999.
9
Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.比较经腹腔镜和机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术与既往同期子宫切除术的手术结局。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Feb;31(2):401-407. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04017-5. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
10
Apical Suspension Repair for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经阴道穹隆顶端悬吊修复术治疗阴道穹隆脱垂:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Aug 1;159(8):845-855. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1206.