From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Mar 1;27(3):133-139. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000999.
Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF), uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) are common routes for vaginal apical suspension. Comparative data analyzing perioperative adverse events among these 3 routes are sparse. Perioperative morbidity was compared among these 3 approaches.
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients older than 18 years undergoing these surgical procedures from 2012 to 2018. Baseline characteristics, postoperative complications, and rates and timing of readmission/reoperation with identification of causes for either were extracted. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of readmission or reoperation, adjusting for concurrent hysterectomy and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score.
There were 1,881 SSLFs, 975 USLSs, and 4,559 MISCs that were performed from 2012 to 2018. Vaginal approaches were more common in older, non-White women; women with comorbidities; and women with higher ASA scores and performed more often by gynecologists (vs urologists). More concomitant hysterectomies were performed with USLS and MISC than with SSLF (22% and 26% vs 5%). Increased postoperative blood transfusions, urinary tract infections, and overall complications were noted in the vaginal approaches (7% and 7% vs 5%). Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy had longer operative times. More same-day discharges were observed in USLS and SSLF. Readmission (2%-3%) and reoperation (1%-2%) rates were similar across all routes when adjusted for concomitant hysterectomy and ASA class. The most common indications for readmission were related to bleeding, infection, or bowel issues (MISC). Hemorrhage/hematoma followed by intestinal obstruction was the most common indication for reoperation.
Overall perioperative safety is comparable in 3 common vaginal apical suspension routes. Readmission and reoperation remain rare after operative colpopexy regardless of route.
骶骨固定术(SSLF)、子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术(USLS)和微创骶骨阴道固定术(MISC)是阴道顶悬吊的常见途径。目前比较这 3 种途径围手术期不良事件的相关数据较为缺乏。本研究比较了这 3 种方法的围手术期发病率。
从 2012 年至 2018 年,美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库中查询了年龄大于 18 岁接受这些手术的患者。提取了基线特征、术后并发症以及再次入院/再次手术的发生率和时间,并确定了再次入院/再次手术的原因。使用逻辑回归比较了再次入院或再次手术的几率,同时调整了同期子宫切除术和美国麻醉师协会(ASA)评分的影响。
2012 年至 2018 年共实施了 1881 例 SSLF、975 例 USLS 和 4559 例 MISC。阴道入路更常见于年龄较大、非白人、合并症、ASA 评分较高的女性,且多由妇科医生(而非泌尿科医生)实施。USLS 和 MISC 比 SSLF 更常同时行子宫切除术(22%和 26%比 5%)。阴道入路术后更常发生输血、尿路感染和总体并发症(7%和 7%比 5%)。微创骶骨阴道固定术的手术时间较长。USLS 和 SSLF 中观察到更多的当天出院。调整同期子宫切除术和 ASA 分级后,所有入路的再入院(2%-3%)和再次手术(1%-2%)率相似。再入院的最常见原因与出血、感染或肠道问题有关(MISC)。出血/血肿继以肠梗阻是再次手术的最常见原因。
3 种常见阴道顶悬吊途径的总体围手术期安全性相当。无论手术途径如何,阴道固定术后再入院和再手术仍然很少见。