• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成像模态与大体检查对胰腺导管腺癌肿瘤大小评估及分期分析的比较准确性

Comparative Accuracy of Tumor Size Assessment and Stage Analysis by Imaging Modalities Versus Gross Examination for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

作者信息

Kassardjian Ari, Stanzione Nicholas, Wang Hanlin L

机构信息

From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Pancreas. 2019 Feb;48(2):223-227. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001233.

DOI:10.1097/MPA.0000000000001233
PMID:30629023
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Tumor size has been shown to be a strong predictor of patient survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aims of this study were to assess the consistency of preoperative imaging and gross examination for PDAC tumor size measurement and to evaluate the impact on T and overall tumor staging when size measurements by imaging and gross examination were different.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with PDAC who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 268 cases were included.

RESULTS

Imaging studies underestimated tumor size in comparison with gross examination. Staging the tumors based on imaging size using the eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer resulted in an altered T stage in 106 cases (39.6%). There was no T-stage change in the remaining 162 cases (60.4%) despite the presence of variable size discrepancies (0.1-1.7 cm). When nodal metastases were also considered, there was no change in the overall tumor stage in most cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although discrepancies exist between tumor size measurements by imaging modalities and gross examination, which may result in an altered T stage in a substantial number of cases, the overall tumor stage is only rarely altered.

摘要

目的

肿瘤大小已被证明是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者生存的有力预测指标。本研究的目的是评估术前影像学检查和大体检查在测量PDAC肿瘤大小方面的一致性,并评估当影像学检查和大体检查测量的肿瘤大小不同时对T分期和总体肿瘤分期的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2007年至2017年接受胰十二指肠切除术或胰腺远端切除术的PDAC患者。共纳入268例病例。

结果

与大体检查相比,影像学检查低估了肿瘤大小。根据美国癌症联合委员会第八版基于影像学大小对肿瘤进行分期,导致106例(39.6%)患者的T分期发生改变。其余162例(60.4%)患者尽管存在大小差异(0.1 - 1.7 cm),但T分期未发生变化。当同时考虑淋巴结转移时,大多数病例的总体肿瘤分期没有变化。

结论

尽管影像学检查和大体检查在肿瘤大小测量上存在差异,这可能导致相当数量病例的T分期改变,但总体肿瘤分期很少改变。

相似文献

1
Comparative Accuracy of Tumor Size Assessment and Stage Analysis by Imaging Modalities Versus Gross Examination for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.成像模态与大体检查对胰腺导管腺癌肿瘤大小评估及分期分析的比较准确性
Pancreas. 2019 Feb;48(2):223-227. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001233.
2
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: variability in measurements of tumor size among computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and pathologic specimens.胰腺腺癌:在计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像和病理标本中测量肿瘤大小的差异。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Mar;45(3):782-788. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02125-w.
3
Impact of Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.美国癌症联合委员会第八版胰腺癌分期手册变化的影响。
Pancreas. 2019 Aug;48(7):876-882. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001349.
4
Value of EUS in early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.EUS 在早期检测伴有胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的胰腺导管腺癌中的价值。
Endoscopy. 2014 Jan;46(1):22-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1353603. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
5
Clinicopathological correlation of radiologic measurement of post-therapy tumor size and tumor volume for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.胰腺导管腺癌治疗后肿瘤大小和体积的影像学测量与临床病理相关性分析。
Pancreatology. 2021 Jan;21(1):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
6
Gross tumor size using the AJCC 8th ed. T staging criteria does not provide prognostic stratification for neoadjuvant treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.采用 AJCC 第 8 版 T 分期标准的大体肿瘤大小不能为新辅助治疗的胰腺导管腺癌提供预后分层。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020 Jun;46:151485. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151485. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
7
Risk factors for latent distant organ metastasis detected by staging laparoscopy in patients with radiologically defined locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.经影像学检查确诊为局部晚期胰腺导管腺癌患者,分期腹腔镜检查发现潜在远处器官转移的危险因素。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Dec;23(12):750-755. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.408. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
8
Utility of CT Radiomics Features in Differentiation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma From Normal Pancreatic Tissue.CT 放射组学特征在鉴别胰腺导管腺癌与正常胰腺组织中的应用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):349-357. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20901. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
9
[Radiological evaluation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma].[胰腺导管腺癌的放射学评估]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2012 Mar;39(3):342-6.
10
Does mesenteric venous imaging assessment accurately predict pathologic invasion in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?肠系膜静脉成像评估能否准确预测局限性胰腺导管腺癌的病理性侵犯?
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Oct;20(10):925-931. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical issues in pathologic evaluation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resected after neoadjuvant treatment: a narrative review.新辅助治疗后切除的胰腺导管腺癌病理评估中的关键问题:叙述性综述。
Chin Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun;11(3):21. doi: 10.21037/cco-21-175. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
Predicting early recurrence for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study in China.预测切除术后胰腺导管腺癌的早期复发:一项中国多中心回顾性研究
Am J Cancer Res. 2021 Jun 15;11(6):3055-3069. eCollection 2021.
3
Clinicopathological correlation of radiologic measurement of post-therapy tumor size and tumor volume for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
胰腺导管腺癌治疗后肿瘤大小和体积的影像学测量与临床病理相关性分析。
Pancreatology. 2021 Jan;21(1):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 14.