Suppr超能文献

接受生物类似药 Remicade 维持治疗后转换治疗的炎症性肠病患者的结局。

Outcomes of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Switched From Maintenance Therapy With a Biosimilar to Remicade.

机构信息

First Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Nov;17(12):2506-2513.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is evidence that it is safe and effective for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) to switch from maintenance therapy with an original infliximab drug to a biosimilar, but little is known about outcomes of reverse switches and/or multiple switches. We aimed to evaluate the effects of a reverse switch (from a biosimilar to Remicade) in a real-life cohort.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of 174 unselected and consecutive patients with IBD (136 with Crohn's disease [CD] and 38 with ulcerative colitis [UC]) who received maintenance therapy with the biosimilar in Hungary. In September 2017, patients were switched from the biosimilar (CT-P13) to Remicade, due to reimbursement policies. In our cohort, 8% (n = 14) patients had been previously exposed to the originator Remicade. We collected clinical and biochemical information from patients at baseline (time of the switch) and 16 and 24 weeks thereafter. Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's disease activity index <150 points or no fistula drainage, or a partial Mayo score <3 points for patients with UC. Serum drug trough levels and anti-drug antibodies were measured at baseline and week 16.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 8 before the switch (82.5% with CD and 82.9% with UC), at baseline (80.6% with CD and 81.6% with UC), at week 16 (77.5% with CD and 83.7% with UC), or at week 24 (CD 76.3% with CD and 84.9% with UC) (P = .60 among groups for patients with CD and P = .98 among groups for patients with UC). For all patients, mean serum trough levels of infliximab were 5.33 ± 4.70 μg/mL at baseline and 5.69 ± 4.94 μg/mL at week 16 (P = .71); we did not find significant differences in prevalence of anti-drug antibody at baseline (16.2%) compared with week 16 (16.9%) (P = .87). Four infusion reactions occurred, until week 24 of follow up. There was no difference in outcomes or trough or antidrug antibody levels between patients with or without previous exposure to Remicade.

CONCLUSIONS

We collected data from a real-life cohort of patients with CD or UC who were switched from maintenance therapy with a biosimilar to Remicade or were treated with only Remicade. No significant changes were observed in remission, trough levels, or antidrug antibodies in patients switched from the biosimilar to Remicade. No new safety signals were detected.

摘要

背景与目的

有证据表明,对于炎症性肠病(IBD)患者,从最初的英夫利昔单抗药物维持治疗转换为生物类似药是安全且有效的,但对于反向转换(从生物类似药转换为英夫利昔单抗)和/或多次转换的结果知之甚少。我们旨在评估在真实队列中反向转换(从生物类似药转换为 Remicade)的效果。

方法

我们对匈牙利接受生物类似药维持治疗的 174 名未经选择的连续 IBD 患者(136 名克罗恩病 [CD] 患者和 38 名溃疡性结肠炎 [UC] 患者)进行了前瞻性观察性研究。2017 年 9 月,由于报销政策,患者从生物类似药(CT-P13)转换为 Remicade。在我们的队列中,8%(n=14)的患者之前曾使用过原始 Remicade。我们在转换时(基线)和之后的 16 周和 24 周收集患者的临床和生化信息。临床缓解定义为 CD 活动指数<150 分或无瘘管引流,或 UC 患者部分 Mayo 评分<3 分。在基线和第 16 周测量血清药物谷浓度和抗药物抗体。

结果

转换前第 8 周(CD 患者 82.5%,UC 患者 82.9%)、基线时(CD 患者 80.6%,UC 患者 81.6%)、第 16 周(CD 患者 77.5%,UC 患者 83.7%)和第 24 周(CD 患者 76.3%,UC 患者 84.9%)时临床缓解患者的比例无显著差异(P=0.60 组间比较 CD 患者,P=0.98 组间比较 UC 患者)。对于所有患者,英夫利昔单抗的平均血清谷浓度分别为基线时 5.33±4.70μg/mL 和第 16 周时 5.69±4.94μg/mL(P=0.71);我们没有发现基线时(16.2%)与第 16 周时(16.9%)抗药物抗体的阳性率存在显著差异(P=0.87)。在随访的第 24 周之前,共发生了 4 次输液反应。有或没有先前使用 Remicade 的患者在缓解、谷浓度或抗药物抗体水平方面没有差异。

结论

我们从接受生物类似药维持治疗的 CD 或 UC 患者的真实队列中收集数据,这些患者已从生物类似药转换为 Remicade 或仅接受 Remicade 治疗。从生物类似药转换为 Remicade 的患者,在缓解、谷浓度或抗药物抗体方面没有观察到明显变化。未发现新的安全信号。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验