• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多普勒引导下经肛门痔动脉结扎术与传统痔切除术治疗痔疮的早期及长期术后结果

Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterilization versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for treatment of hemorrhoids - early and long-term postoperative results.

作者信息

Popov V, Yonkov A, Arabadzhieva E, Zhivkov E, Bonev S, Bulanov D, Tasev V, Korukov G, Simonova L, Kandilarov N, Taseva A, Dimitrova V

机构信息

Department of General and Hepato-pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital "Alexandrovska", 1 Georgi Sofiiski Str, 1431, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Medical University-Sofia, 15 Acad. I. E. Geshov Bul, 1431, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0469-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-019-0469-9
PMID:30630463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6327383/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A variety of effective methods for treatment of hemorrhoids has been proposed. In recent years, there has been an increasing number of studies comparing transanal hemorrhoidal dearterilization (THD) and conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH), but the focus of most studies has been about the early postoperative results. The data about long-term outcomes is still limited. We aimed to compare Doppler-guided THD and CH with regard to early and long-term postoperative results.

METHODS

The conducted prospective research included 287 patients who underwent CH (167 cases) or Doppler-guided THD with mycopexy (120 patients) between November 2010 and December 2015. Information on hemorrhoidal stage, demographic data, presenting symptoms, complications, duration of hospital stay, postoperative pain, patients' satisfaction and follow-up were obtained. Statistical tests were performed by SPSS 19.0.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the studied groups according to gender, mean age, preoperative prolapse, pain and pruritus, hemorrhoidal stage and postoperative complications. Preoperative bleeding was more frequent in THD group (p = 0,002). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in CH and THD groups on days 1, 2 and 7 were 7.01 vs 5.03, 5.07 vs 2.98, 2.39 vs 0,57 (p = 0,000). Practically, there was no difference in VAS on day 30 and patients' satisfaction at the 18th month. Mean hospital stay was 5,13 (CH) and 3,38 days (THD), p = 0,000. The postoperative follow-up was between 18 and 78 months (mean 46 ± 16 months). During this stage, 5 patients (2,99%) in CH group required surgery for recurrence. In THD group, 3 patients (2,5%), all with 4th-degree hemorrhoids underwent additional procedures (p 0,802).

CONCLUSIONS

Doppler-guided THD seems to be an efficient and safe option for treatment of hemorrhoids, related to lower postoperative pain and excellent, similar long-term outcomes compared to CH. For advanced grades of hemorrhoids, Doppler-guided THD could be a valuable alternative, but there is a need for patients' selection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

(retrospectively registered) researchregistry 3090 .

摘要

背景

已提出多种治疗痔疮的有效方法。近年来,比较经肛门痔动脉结扎术(THD)和传统痔切除术(CH)的研究越来越多,但大多数研究的重点是术后早期结果。关于长期疗效的数据仍然有限。我们旨在比较多普勒引导下的THD和CH在术后早期和长期的疗效。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了287例在2010年11月至2015年12月期间接受CH(167例)或多普勒引导下带肌固定术的THD(120例)的患者。获取了有关痔疮分期、人口统计学数据、主要症状、并发症、住院时间、术后疼痛、患者满意度和随访等信息。采用SPSS 19.0进行统计检验。

结果

根据性别、平均年龄、术前脱垂、疼痛和瘙痒、痔疮分期及术后并发症,研究组之间无显著差异。THD组术前出血更频繁(p = 0.002)。CH组和THD组在第1、2和7天的平均视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分分别为7.01对5.03、5.07对2.98、2.39对0.57(p = 0.000)。实际上,第30天的VAS和第18个月的患者满意度无差异。平均住院时间CH组为5.13天,THD组为3.38天,p = 0.000。术后随访时间为18至78个月(平均46±16个月)。在此阶段,CH组有5例患者(2.99%)因复发需要再次手术。THD组有3例患者(2.5%),均为IV度痔疮,接受了额外的手术(p = 0.802)。

结论

多普勒引导下的THD似乎是一种治疗痔疮的有效且安全的选择,与CH相比,术后疼痛较轻,长期疗效良好且相似。对于晚期痔疮,多普勒引导下的THD可能是一种有价值的替代方法,但需要对患者进行选择。

试验注册

(回顾性注册)researchregistry 3090 。

相似文献

1
Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterilization versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for treatment of hemorrhoids - early and long-term postoperative results.多普勒引导下经肛门痔动脉结扎术与传统痔切除术治疗痔疮的早期及长期术后结果
BMC Surg. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0469-9.
2
Distal Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade III and IV hemorrhoids: postoperative morbidity and long-term outcomes.经肛门多普勒引导痔动脉结扎术联合黏膜固定术与传统痔切除术治疗 III、IV 度痔:术后并发症和长期疗效比较。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 May;21(5):337-344. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1620-1. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
A prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique.一项前瞻性随机对照试验,评估经肛门痔动脉结扎术与选择性痔切除术治疗痔的短期疗效。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Sep;21(9):737-743. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1669-x. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for hemorrhoidal disease: a single-center study on 1000 consecutive cases and a review of the literature.经肛门直肠黏膜下动脉结扎术(THD)治疗痔病:一项 1000 例连续病例的单中心研究及文献复习
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Dec;21(12):953-962. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1726-5. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
5
Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in treatment of internal hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.经肛门痔动脉结扎术(THD)与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(SH)治疗内痔的比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jan;34(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3187-3. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
6
Comparison of Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization for Grade III and IV Hemorrhoids in Vietnam.越南 3 度和 4 度痔的多普勒引导经肛痔动脉结扎术比较。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jun;36(6):1388-1397. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00948-z. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
7
Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (DG-THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the Treatment of Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Clinical Results at Short and Long-Term Follow-Up.多普勒引导下经肛门痔动脉结扎术(DG-THD)与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(SH)治疗三度痔的短期和长期随访临床结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Nov;20(11):1886-1890. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3220-1. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
8
A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids.一项前瞻性、随机试验比较了多普勒引导下经肛门痔动脉结扎术联合黏膜固定术与传统痔切除术治疗 III 度痔的短期和长期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):348-53. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000085.
9
Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: Long-Term Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Study.经肛门痔动脉结扎术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术:一项前瞻性随机研究的长期随访
Surg Innov. 2018 Jun;25(3):236-241. doi: 10.1177/1553350618761757. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
10
Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD): a safe procedure for the anticoagulated patient?经肛门痔动脉结扎术(THD):对抗凝患者来说是一种安全的手术吗?
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Jul;20(7):461-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1481-z. Epub 2016 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Doppler-Guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation and Rectoanal Repair (HAL-RAR): An Institutional Experience.多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术与直肠肛管修复术(HAL-RAR):一项机构经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 31;14(15):5397. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155397.
2
Latest Research Trends on the Management of Hemorrhoids.痔疮治疗的最新研究趋势
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2025 Apr 25;9(2):179-191. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2024-090. eCollection 2025.
3
Efficacy and Safety of a New Technique Combining Injection Sclerotherapy and External Hemorrhoidectomy for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids: A Single-center Observational Study.一种结合注射硬化疗法和外痔切除术治疗脱垂性痔新技术的疗效与安全性:一项单中心观察性研究
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Oct 25;8(4):331-339. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2024-034. eCollection 2024.
4
Effectiveness of Topical Ketorolac in Post-hemorrhoidectomy Pain Management: A Clinical Trial.外用酮咯酸在痔切除术后疼痛管理中的有效性:一项临床试验。
Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Feb 17;13(1):e130904. doi: 10.5812/aapm-130904. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Ten-year multicentric retrospective analysis regarding postoperative complications and impact of comorbidities in hemorrhoidal surgery with literature review.关于痔手术术后并发症及合并症影响的十年多中心回顾性分析并文献综述
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jan 16;11(2):366-384. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i2.366.
6
Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for hemorrhoidal disease: An Italian single-institution 5-year experience analysis and updated literature review.经肛门痔动脉结扎术(THD)治疗痔病:意大利单机构5年经验分析及最新文献综述
Front Surg. 2022 Dec 21;9:1088546. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1088546. eCollection 2022.
7
Emborrhoid: Rectal Artery Embolization for Hemorrhoid Disease.痔:用于痔病的直肠动脉栓塞术
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2022 Jun 30;39(2):194-202. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1745800. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Linear Pinched Hemorrhoidectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study (An Innovative, Simplified Hemorrhoidectomy).线性夹闭痔切除术:一项回顾性观察研究(一种创新、简化的痔切除术)
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2021 Jul 29;5(3):261-267. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2020-076. eCollection 2021.
9
Safety and effectiveness of hemorrhoidal artery ligation using the HAL-RAR technique for hemorrhoidal disease.痔动脉结扎术(HAL-RAR 技术)治疗痔病的安全性和有效性。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Nov;406(7):2489-2495. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02190-0. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
Still a Case of "No Pain, No Gain"? An Updated and Critical Review of the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management Options for Hemorrhoids in 2020.仍然是“没有疼痛就没有收获”的情况吗?2020年痔疮发病机制、诊断及治疗选择的最新批判性综述
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Jun;36(3):133-147. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.05.04. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Distal Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade III and IV hemorrhoids: postoperative morbidity and long-term outcomes.经肛门多普勒引导痔动脉结扎术联合黏膜固定术与传统痔切除术治疗 III、IV 度痔:术后并发症和长期疗效比较。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 May;21(5):337-344. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1620-1. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
2
Is the severe pain after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy still currently remaining a major postoperative problem despite being one of the oldest surgical techniques described? A case series of 117 consecutive patients.尽管Milligan-Morgan痔切除术是描述得最早的外科手术技术之一,但术后剧痛目前仍是一个主要的术后问题吗?对117例连续患者的病例系列研究。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;30:73-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
3
Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.经肛门痔动脉结扎术联合黏膜固定术与开放性痔切除术治疗痔疮的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Dec;20(12):825-833. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1551-2. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
4
Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization/transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: Technical evolution and outcomes after 20 years.多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术/经肛门痔动脉结扎术:20年后的技术演变与疗效
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Mar 27;8(3):232-7. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i3.232.
5
Advantages and limits of hemorrhoidal dearterialization in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids.痔动脉结扎术治疗有症状痔的优势与局限性
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan 27;8(1):1-4. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i1.1.
6
Evaluation of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a single surgeon experience.经肛门痔动脉结扎术的评估:单术者经验
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Mar;19(3):153-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1269-6. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
7
Doppler-guided ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries with mucopexy: A technique for the future.多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术联合黏膜固定术:一种未来的技术。
J Visc Surg. 2015 Apr;152(2 Suppl):S15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
8
A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids.一项前瞻性、随机试验比较了多普勒引导下经肛门痔动脉结扎术联合黏膜固定术与传统痔切除术治疗 III 度痔的短期和长期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):348-53. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000085.
9
Transanal dearterialization with targeted mucopexy is effective for advanced haemorrhoids.经肛门去动脉化联合靶向黏膜固定术治疗重度痔疗效显著。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 May;16(5):373-6. doi: 10.1111/codi.12574.
10
Advantages of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization as compared to other surgical techniques for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.与其他治疗痔病的手术技术相比,经肛门痔动脉结扎术的优势。
Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2013(3):4-7.