Li Qiuyun, Cai Yan, Tan Qingrong, Tu Dongbo
School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 12;9:2511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02511. eCollection 2018.
The Arabic Scale of Death Anxiety (ASDA), as one of the most widely used measures of death anxiety (DA), has increasingly been applied in many studies. However, the structures derived from different studies are highly inconsistent. In this study, both traditional and novel (bifactor) modeling approaches were used, to investigate the most optimal structure of the ASDA in a sample of 984 Chinese college students. After a series of comparisons, the results showed that the bifactor model, with a dominant general DA factor and three distinct sub-dimensions, was the most optimal measurement structure, and measurement invariance of this bifactor model between sexes was also confirmed. Based on the implications of this bifactor model, the discussion was focused mainly on whether distinct dimensions should be interpreted or not. Some strengths and limitations of the study were also discussed at the end of the paper.
阿拉伯死亡焦虑量表(ASDA)作为使用最广泛的死亡焦虑(DA)测量工具之一,已越来越多地应用于许多研究中。然而,不同研究得出的结构高度不一致。在本研究中,采用了传统和新颖的(双因素)建模方法,以调查984名中国大学生样本中ASDA的最优结构。经过一系列比较,结果表明,具有一个主导的一般死亡焦虑因素和三个不同子维度的双因素模型是最优的测量结构,并且还证实了该双因素模型在性别之间的测量不变性。基于此双因素模型的含义,讨论主要集中在是否应解释不同维度。论文结尾还讨论了该研究的一些优点和局限性。