Bernard P, Hains-Monfette G, Atoui S, Moullec G
Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Research Center, University Institute of Mental Health at Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Can Respir J. 2018 Dec 2;2018:9107435. doi: 10.1155/2018/9107435. eCollection 2018.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is expected to be the third leading cause of premature death and disability in Canada and around the world by the year 2020. The study aims to compare objective physical activity (PA) and sedentary time in a population-based sample of adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and compare a group, and to investigate whether these behaviors differ according to COPD severity. From the 2007-2013 Canadian Health Measures Survey dataset, accelerometer and prebronchodilator spirometry data were available for 6441 participants, aged 35 to 79. Two weighted analyses of covariance were performed with adjustments for age, sex, body mass index, accelerometer wearing time, season, work, smoking (cotinine), education level, and income. A set of sensitivity analyses were carried out to examine the possible effect of COPD and type of control group. A cross-sectional weighted analysis indicated that 14.6% of study participants had a measured airflow obstruction consistent with COPD. Time in PA (moderate-vigorous and light PA), number of steps, and sedentary duration were not significantly different in participants with COPD, taken together, compared to controls. However, moderate to severe COPD participants (stages ≥2) had a significantly lower daily time spent in PA of moderate and vigorous intensity level compared to controls. Canadian adults with COPD with all disease severity levels combined did not show lower daily duration of light, moderate, and vigorous PA, and number of steps and higher daily sedentary time than those without airflow obstruction. Both groups are extremely sedentary and have low PA duration. Thus, "move more and sit less" public health strategy could equally target adults with or without COPD.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)预计到2020年将成为加拿大乃至全球过早死亡和残疾的第三大主要原因。该研究旨在比较以人群为基础的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)成年样本中的客观身体活动(PA)和久坐时间,并比较一组人群,同时调查这些行为是否因COPD严重程度而异。从2007 - 2013年加拿大健康措施调查数据集可知,6441名年龄在35至79岁的参与者有加速度计和支气管扩张剂前肺活量测定数据。进行了两次加权协方差分析,并对年龄、性别、体重指数、加速度计佩戴时间、季节、工作、吸烟(可替宁)、教育水平和收入进行了调整。进行了一组敏感性分析以检验COPD和对照组类型的可能影响。横断面加权分析表明,14.6%的研究参与者有与COPD一致的测量气流阻塞。总体而言,与对照组相比,COPD参与者的PA时间(中度 - 剧烈和轻度PA)、步数和久坐持续时间没有显著差异。然而,与对照组相比,中度至重度COPD参与者(≥2期)在中度和剧烈强度水平的PA中每天花费的时间显著更低。所有疾病严重程度级别的加拿大COPD成年患者与无气流阻塞的患者相比,并未表现出轻度、中度和剧烈PA的每日持续时间更低、步数更少以及每日久坐时间更长。两组都久坐不动且PA持续时间较低。因此,“多运动少久坐”的公共卫生策略可以同样针对有或没有COPD的成年人。