Corti Emily J, Johnson Andrew R, Gasson Natalie, Bucks Romola S, Thomas Meghan G, Loftus Andrea M
Curtin Neuroscience Research Laboratory, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
ParkC Collaborative, Perth, WA, Australia.
Parkinsons Dis. 2018 Dec 4;2018:7128069. doi: 10.1155/2018/7128069. eCollection 2018.
The Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ) is used extensively in health research, but the measurement properties and suitability of the WCQ for people with Parkinson's disease (PD) have not been psychometrically assessed. If the WCQ does not align with its original 8-factor structure in a PD population, the use of the WCQ subscales may not be appropriate. The present study used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and multiple-group EFA to determine the ideal factor structure of the WCQ in a PD sample. The original 8 factors of the WCQ were not reproduced. EFA revealed a 6-factor structure, including Distancing, Faith, Avoidance, Seeking Social Support, Planful Problem Solving, and Confrontive coping. As motor symptom severity may impact coping, the stability of the 6-factor structure was examined across motor symptom severity (mild and moderate), remaining consistent. Higher levels of overall motor severity were associated with increased use of faith and avoidance style coping. These findings suggest that the 6-factor structure of the WCQ may be more appropriate for assessing coping styles in PD.
应对方式问卷(WCQ)在健康研究中被广泛使用,但该问卷对于帕金森病(PD)患者的测量特性及适用性尚未经过心理测量学评估。如果WCQ在PD人群中不符合其原有的8因素结构,那么使用WCQ分量表可能并不合适。本研究采用验证性因素分析(CFA)、探索性因素分析(EFA)和多组EFA来确定PD样本中WCQ的理想因素结构。WCQ原有的8个因素并未重现。EFA揭示了一个6因素结构,包括疏离、信念、回避、寻求社会支持、有计划地解决问题和对抗性应对。由于运动症状严重程度可能影响应对方式,因此在不同运动症状严重程度(轻度和中度)下检验了6因素结构的稳定性,结果保持一致。总体运动严重程度较高与更多地使用信念和回避型应对方式相关。这些发现表明,WCQ的6因素结构可能更适合评估PD患者的应对方式。