Sokolowski H Moriah, Ansari Daniel
University of Western Ontario, London, ON Canada.
NPJ Sci Learn. 2018 Oct 1;3:17. doi: 10.1038/s41539-018-0032-y. eCollection 2018.
Early educational interventions aim to close gaps in achievement levels between children. However, early interventions do not eliminate individual differences in populations and the effects of early interventions often fade-out over time, despite changes of the mean of the population immediately following the intervention. Here, we discuss biological factors that help to better understand why early educational interventions do not eliminate achievement gaps. Children experience and respond to educational interventions differently. These stable individual differences are a consequence of biological mechanisms that support the interplay between genetic predispositions and the embedding of experience into our biology. Accordingly, we argue that it is not plausible to conceptualize the goals of educational interventions as both a shifting of the mean and a narrowing of the distribution of a particular measure of educational attainment assumed to be of utmost importance (such as a standardized test score). Instead of aiming to equalize the performance of students, the key goal of educational interventions should be to maximize potential at the individual level and consider a kaleidoscope of educational outcomes across which individuals vary. Additionally, in place of employing short-term interventions in the hope of achieving long-term gains, educational interventions need to be sustained throughout development and their long-term, rather than short-term, efficacy be evaluated. In summary, this paper highlights how biological research is valuable for driving a re-evaluation of how educational success across development can be conceptualized and thus what policy implications may be drawn.
早期教育干预旨在缩小儿童之间的成就水平差距。然而,早期干预并不能消除群体中的个体差异,而且早期干预的效果往往会随着时间的推移而逐渐消失,尽管在干预后群体的均值会立即发生变化。在此,我们讨论一些生物学因素,这些因素有助于更好地理解为什么早期教育干预无法消除成就差距。儿童对教育干预的体验和反应各不相同。这些稳定的个体差异是生物机制的结果,这些机制支持遗传倾向与将经验融入我们的生物学过程之间的相互作用。因此,我们认为,将教育干预的目标概念化为既改变均值又缩小假定为最重要的特定教育成就衡量指标的分布范围(例如标准化考试成绩)是不合理的。教育干预的关键目标不应是追求学生表现的均等化,而应是在个体层面上最大化潜力,并考虑个体各不相同的一系列教育成果。此外,教育干预不应采用短期干预以期获得长期收益,而需要在整个发展过程中持续进行,并评估其长期而非短期的效果。总之,本文强调了生物学研究对于推动重新评估如何界定整个发展过程中的教育成功以及由此可能得出哪些政策含义具有重要价值。