全球“明智选择”运动：应对医疗保健过度使用问题的共同方法。
Choosing Wisely campaigns globally: A shared approach to tackling the problem of overuse in healthcare.
作者信息
Born Karen B, Levinson Wendy
机构信息
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
出版信息
J Gen Fam Med. 2018 Dec 21;20(1):9-12. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.225. eCollection 2019 Jan.
Abstract
Choosing Wisely, a campaign which launched in the United States in 2012, has now spread to over 20 countries around the world. Choosing Wisely campaigns share a core set of principles, which inform how campaigns operate and engage with physicians, clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders. This article will address the origins and motivation of Choosing Wisely campaigns, and what factors have supported their spread. It will also discuss how leaders of Choosing Wisely campaigns are collaborating on shared priorities.
摘要
“明智选择”运动于2012年在美国发起，如今已蔓延至全球20多个国家。“明智选择”运动有着一系列核心原则，这些原则指导着运动的开展方式以及与医生、临床医生、患者和其他利益相关者的互动。本文将探讨“明智选择”运动的起源和动机，以及促使其传播的因素。还将讨论“明智选择”运动的领导者如何就共同的优先事项开展合作。
相似文献
1
Choosing Wisely campaigns globally: A shared approach to tackling the problem of overuse in healthcare.全球“明智选择”运动：应对医疗保健过度使用问题的共同方法。
J Gen Fam Med. 2018 Dec 21;20(1):9-12. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.225. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
Reframing Resource Stewardship and Sustainability as Professionalism: What Can Efforts for a Net-Zero Health System Learn from Choosing Wisely Campaigns?将资源管理与可持续性重新定义为职业素养：实现净零排放医疗系统的努力能从明智选择运动中学到什么？
Healthc Pap. 2020 Oct;19(3):35-40. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2020.26375.
3
'Choosing Wisely': a growing international campaign.“明智选择”：一项日益发展的国际运动。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):167-74. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003821. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
4
"Choosing Wisely Canada" and antimicrobial stewardship: A shared focus on reducing unnecessary care.“明智选择加拿大”与抗菌药物管理：共同致力于减少不必要的医疗护理
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2015 Jun 18;41(Suppl 4):9-13. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v41is4a03.
5
Randomized Trial of the Choosing Wisely Consumer Questions and a Shared Decision-Making Video Intervention on Decision-Making Outcomes.随机试验选择明智的消费者问题和一个共享决策视频干预对决策结果。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Aug;43(6):642-655. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231184461. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
6
Choosing Wisely - An international and multimorbid perspective.明智选择——国际与多病共存视角
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Dec;129:27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
7
Choosing Wisely in Emergency Medicine: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Academic Chairs and Division Chiefs.急诊医学中的明智选择：一项针对急诊医学学术主任和科室主任的全国性调查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;22(12):1506-10. doi: 10.1111/acem.12821. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
8
Measuring the effect of Choosing Wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care.衡量明智选择的效果：评估运动对低价值医疗的影响的综合框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):523-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004070. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
9
Physician perceptions of Choosing Wisely and drivers of overuse.医生对“明智选择”及过度医疗驱动因素的看法。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 May;22(5):337-43.
10
Academic physicians' views on low-value services and the choosing wisely campaign: A qualitative study.学术医师对低价值服务和明智选择运动的看法：一项定性研究。
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Mar;5(1-2):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 25.
引用本文的文献
1
Journey of a pill.一粒药丸的历程。
Can Fam Physician. 2025 Apr;71(4):263-269. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7104263.
2
Selecting indicators for the measurement of low-value care using German claims data: A three-round modified Delphi panel.利用德国理赔数据选择低价值医疗测量指标：三轮改良德尔菲专家小组法
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 18;20(2):e0314864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314864. eCollection 2025.
3
Patient characteristics and healthcare use for high-cost patients with musculoskeletal disorders in Norway: a cohort study.挪威肌肉骨骼疾病高成本患者的特征及医疗保健利用情况：一项队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1583. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12051-3.
4
How Do Australians Manage Diagnostic Testing Risks? Focus Groups Linked to a Model of Behaviour Change.澳大利亚人如何管理诊断检测风险？与行为改变模型相关的焦点小组。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70038. doi: 10.1111/hex.70038.
5
How Medical Students Benefit from Participating in a Longitudinal Resource Stewardship Medical Education Program (STARS): An International Descriptive Evaluation.医学生如何从参与纵向资源管理医学教育项目（STARS）中受益：一项国际描述性评估
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan;40(1):146-152. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08971-9. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Gender Disparities in Adverse Events Resulting From Low-Value Practices in Family Practice in Spain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.性别差异在西班牙家庭医学中低价值实践导致的不良事件：一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 16;69:1607030. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607030. eCollection 2024.
7
Reducing Cost of Care Through Deimplementation of Surgical Overtreatment.通过取消手术过度治疗来降低医疗成本。
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Sep 2;2(3):e089. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000089. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Why we all need Choosing Wisely?为什么我们都需要明智选择？
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;18(6):1613-1616. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03356-y. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
9
Epidemiological study on gender bias and low-value practices in primary care: a study protocol.初级保健中性别偏见和低价值实践的流行病学研究：研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 9;13(5):e070311. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070311.
10
Family doctors well suited to being climate leaders.家庭医生非常适合成为气候领导者。
Can Fam Physician. 2023 Apr;69(4):230-232. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6904230.
本文引用的文献
1
Choosing Wisely Campaigns: A Work in Progress.明智选择运动：一项正在进行的工作。
JAMA. 2018 May 15;319(19):1975-1976. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2202.
2
Engaging patients and the public in Choosing Wisely.让患者和公众参与“明智选择”活动。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):687-691. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006595. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
3
Avoiding overuse-the next quality frontier.避免过度使用——下一个质量前沿。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):102-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32570-3. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
4
Measuring the effect of Choosing Wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care.衡量明智选择的效果：评估运动对低价值医疗的影响的综合框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):523-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004070. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
'Choosing Wisely': a growing international campaign.“明智选择”：一项日益发展的国际运动。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):167-74. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003821. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
6
Medicine's ethical responsibility for health care reform--the Top Five list.医学在医疗保健改革中的伦理责任——五大要点
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):283-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0911423. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
Zotero 插件