Salomone Matthew, Kling Thomas
Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA USA.
Int J STEM Educ. 2017;4(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0082-3. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
Peer-cooperative learning has been shown in the literature to improve student success in gateway science and mathematics courses. Such studies typically demonstrate the impact of students' attending peer-led learning sessions on their learning or grades in an individual course. In this article, we examine the effects of introducing a required, comprehensive peer-cooperative learning system across five departments simultaneously at a master's public university, looking not only at students' success in supported classes, but also their retention within STEM fields two years hence. Combining institutional demographic data with students' course grades and retention rates, we compare outcomes between 456 students who took their major's introductory course in the two years prior to implementation of the program, and 552 students who did so after implementation.
While these two student groups did not significantly differ in either their demographic profile or their SAT scores, the post-implementation group earned significantly higher grades in their introductory courses in each major, due largely to an erasure of the mediating effect of SAT scores on course grades. Further, this increase in introductory course grades was also associated with an increase in the two-year retention rate of students in STEM majors.
This finding is significant as it suggests that implementing comprehensive educational reform using required peer-led cooperative learning may have the proximate effect of mitigating differences in academic preparation (as measured by SAT scores) for students in introductory STEM courses. Furthermore, this increase in success leads to increased retention rates in STEM, expanding the pipeline of students retained in such fields.
文献表明,同伴合作学习可提高学生在基础科学和数学课程中的成绩。此类研究通常展示了学生参加同伴主导的学习课程对其在某一单独课程中的学习或成绩的影响。在本文中,我们研究了在一所公立硕士大学同时在五个系引入必修的综合性同伴合作学习系统的效果,不仅着眼于学生在得到支持的课程中的成绩,还关注他们两年后在STEM领域的留存情况。我们将机构人口统计数据与学生的课程成绩及留存率相结合,比较了在该项目实施前两年修读专业入门课程的456名学生与实施后修读的552名学生的结果。
虽然这两组学生在人口统计学特征或SAT分数上没有显著差异,但实施后的学生组在各专业的入门课程中取得了显著更高的成绩,这主要是因为消除了SAT分数对课程成绩的中介作用。此外,入门课程成绩的提高还与STEM专业学生的两年留存率上升相关。
这一发现意义重大,因为它表明使用必修的同伴主导合作学习实施全面教育改革可能会直接减轻STEM入门课程学生在学业准备方面的差异(以SAT分数衡量)。此外,成绩的提高导致STEM领域的留存率上升,扩大了该领域留存学生的渠道。