• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理工科系系统性变革的四个框架。

Four frames for systemic change in STEM departments.

作者信息

Reinholz Daniel L, Apkarian Naneh

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-7720 USA.

出版信息

Int J STEM Educ. 2018;5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0103-x. Epub 2018 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1186/s40594-018-0103-x
PMID:30631693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6310387/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper adapts the four-frame model of organizational change to the context of higher education. We offer the model as a tool for researchers and change agents who wish to study and enact systemic change within STEM departments. We provide the four frames in contrast to overly simplistic models of change that have been shown to be unlikely to result in sustainable improvements. As we outline the four frames, we discuss both how the frames provide insight into potential products for change and how they influence the process of change. We provide an extended example of how the four frames can be used to analyze an existing change effort and implications of this approach for future work.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper adapts a model for promoting and understanding change efforts in STEM departments. This is a model that can be used by nearly any researcher or administrator to help increase the impact of their work.

摘要

背景

本文将组织变革的四框架模型应用于高等教育背景。我们将该模型作为一种工具,供希望在STEM学科系内研究并实施系统性变革的研究人员和变革推动者使用。我们提出这四个框架,以对比那些过于简单化的变革模型,这些模型已被证明不太可能带来可持续的改进。在概述这四个框架时,我们既讨论了这些框架如何为变革的潜在成果提供见解,又讨论了它们如何影响变革过程。我们提供了一个扩展示例,说明如何使用这四个框架来分析现有的变革努力以及这种方法对未来工作的影响。

结论

本文采用了一个模型来促进和理解STEM学科系的变革努力。这是一个几乎任何研究人员或管理人员都可以使用的模型,以帮助增强他们工作的影响力。

相似文献

1
Four frames for systemic change in STEM departments.理工科系系统性变革的四个框架。
Int J STEM Educ. 2018;5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0103-x. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
2
Implementing change in respiratory care.实施呼吸治疗中的变革。
Respir Care. 2010 Jun;55(6):749-57.
3
Identifying perceptions of academic reform in pharmacy using a four-frame organizational change model.运用四框架组织变革模型来识别药学学术改革的认知。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Oct;14(10):921-930. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
4
Faculty drivers and barriers: laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments.教师推动因素与障碍:为学术部门的本科STEM教育改革奠定基础
Int J STEM Educ. 2017;4(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0062-7. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
5
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
6
Monitoring and evaluation of disaster response efforts undertaken by local health departments: a rapid realist review.对地方卫生部门开展的灾害应对工作进行监测与评估:一项快速实效综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2396-8.
7
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
8
Culture and cognition in health systems change.卫生系统中的文化与认知发生变化。
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(7):874-92. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2014-0101.
9
Using the online and offline change model to improve efficiency for fast-track patients in an emergency department.运用线上线下变革模式提高急诊科快速通道患者的就医效率。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Sep;26(9):503-14. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26042-2.
10
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Department Heads Ready for Change? Leveraging a Leadership Action Team to Advance Teaching Evaluation Practices.系主任们准备好迎接变革了吗?利用领导行动小组推进教学评估实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Mar 1;24(1):ar8. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-07-0175.
2
All In: Understanding and Motivating Stakeholders to Create an Equitable Culture of Student Success.全力以赴:理解和激励利益相关者,营造公平的学生成功文化。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):es10. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0065.
3
PULSE Ambassadors program: empowering departments to transform STEM education for inclusion and student success.脉搏大使计划:助力各部门变革STEM教育,以实现包容性及学生的成功。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024 Dec 12;25(3):e0005224. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00052-24. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
4
Eight Indicators for Measuring Equitable Student Success in STEM.衡量STEM领域学生公平成功的八项指标。
Change. 2024;56(3):4-14. doi: 10.1080/00091383.2024.2348425. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
5
Instructional Influencers: Teaching Professors as Potential Departmental Change Agents in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.教学影响者:教授作为多样性、公平性和包容性方面的潜在部门变革推动者。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Sep;23(3):ar35. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-03-0102.
6
Prioritizing Mentorship as Scientific Leaders.将指导作为科学领导者的首要任务。
ACS Cent Sci. 2024 Jan 10;10(2):209-213. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c00500. eCollection 2024 Feb 28.
7
Change as a Scientific Enterprise: Practical Suggestions about Using Change Theory.变革作为一项科学事业:关于使用变革理论的实用建议。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Mar;23(1):es1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0103.
8
Co-teaching in Undergraduate STEM Education: A Lever for Pedagogical Change toward Evidence-Based Teaching?本科 STEM 教育中的合作教学:迈向基于证据的教学的教学变革杠杆?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Mar;22(1):es1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-08-0169.
9
Predicting implementation of active learning by tenure-track teaching faculty using robust cluster analysis.使用稳健聚类分析预测终身教职教师实施主动学习的情况。
Int J STEM Educ. 2022;9(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00365-9. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
10
Empowering faculty to initiate STEM education transformation: Efficacy of a systems thinking approach.赋能教师引领 STEM 教育变革:系统思维方法的效力。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 25;17(7):e0271123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271123. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward a Psychology of Human Agency.朝向人类能动性的心理学。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;1(2):164-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x.
2
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.主动学习可提高学生在科学、工程和数学领域的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. Epub 2014 May 12.
3
Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review.创新扩散研究的故事情节:一种系统综述的元叙事方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(2):417-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001. Epub 2005 Jan 26.