Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Autism Research Centre, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Autism Res. 2019 Apr;12(4):667-681. doi: 10.1002/aur.2072. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is associated with early differences in children's social interactions, communication, and play/interests. In many countries, considerable resources are invested in early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) programs for children with ASD, which aim to build adaptive skills and prevent or treat problem behavior. However, these programs vary widely in structure and delivery. Research evidence supports the efficacy of EIBI, but large knowledge gaps remain about the effectiveness of publicly funded EIBI programs. With policy-makers as formal research partners, we compared children's progress over 1 year in public preschool programs in adjacent Canadian provinces, New Brunswick (NB) and Nova Scotia (NS). In NB, children received up to 20 hr/week of comprehensive EIBI in a publicly funded, privately provided program. In NS, children received up to 15 hr/week of Pivotal Response Treatment and Positive Behavior Support delivered through the publicly funded healthcare system. In this observational parallel cohort study, we collected parent-reported data on 298 NB preschoolers (76.5% boys) and 221 NS preschoolers (86.9% boys) at EIBI start and 1 year later. Multilevel analysis revealed significant differences at baseline: NS children were older, with lower adaptive functioning and more severe ASD symptoms than NB children. Despite these pre-treatment differences that favor NB, children in both provinces showed similar adaptive functioning gains and reductions of maladaptive behavior. No changes were seen in mean ASD symptom severity in either province over time. Results highlight the value of evaluating interventions in their implementation contexts, and have important implications for devising optimal ASD policy. Autism Research 2019, 12: 667-681. © 2019 International Society for Autism Research,Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: We need to know more about the impact of different forms of early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We showed that preschoolers with ASD gained important skills while in public EIBI programs in two Canadian provinces. We also saw that differences in how EIBI programs are structured and characteristics of children who are served may affect outcomes. For these reasons, policy making requires evidence that fits the local context.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)与儿童社交互动、沟通和游戏/兴趣的早期差异有关。在许多国家,为自闭症儿童投入了大量资源用于早期密集行为干预(EIBI)计划,旨在培养适应技能并预防或治疗问题行为。然而,这些计划在结构和交付方式上差异很大。研究证据支持 EIBI 的有效性,但关于公共资助的 EIBI 计划的有效性仍存在很大的知识差距。我们与政策制定者作为正式的研究合作伙伴,比较了加拿大相邻的新不伦瑞克省(NB)和新斯科舍省(NS)的公立学前计划中儿童在 1 年内的进展情况。在 NB,儿童在一个由公共资金资助、私人提供的计划中每周接受多达 20 小时的综合 EIBI。在 NS,儿童每周接受多达 15 小时的关键反应治疗和积极的行为支持,通过公共资助的医疗保健系统提供。在这项观察性平行队列研究中,我们在 EIBI 开始时和 1 年后收集了 298 名 NB 学龄前儿童(76.5%为男孩)和 221 名 NS 学龄前儿童(86.9%为男孩)的家长报告数据。多层次分析显示基线存在显著差异:NS 儿童年龄较大,适应功能较低,自闭症症状较严重。尽管 NB 儿童存在这些有利于治疗的前期差异,但两省的儿童在适应功能方面均取得了类似的增益,不良行为的减少程度也相似。两省的 ASD 症状严重程度在任何时候都没有变化。研究结果突出了在实施背景下评估干预措施的价值,对制定最佳 ASD 政策具有重要意义。自闭症研究 2019,12:667-681。 © 2019 自闭症国际研究协会,Wiley 期刊,公司。
我们需要更多地了解不同形式的早期密集行为干预(EIBI)对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)幼儿的影响。我们表明,在加拿大两个省份的公共 EIBI 计划中,自闭症儿童获得了重要技能。我们还发现,EIBI 计划的结构差异以及所服务儿童的特征可能会影响结果。因此,政策制定需要符合当地情况的证据。