Suppr超能文献

评估韩国公众对患者参与患者安全的看法。

Assessment of Public Perception Regarding Patient Engagement for Patient Safety in Korea.

机构信息

From the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine.

Office of Research Planning and Coordination Department, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2021 Jan 1;17(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000565.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study conducted a survey to examine how the general public in Korea perceives patient engagement for patient safety and to identify vulnerable groups and contents priorities of patient engagement education for the general public.

METHODS

We developed a questionnaire based on previous studies and conducted one-on-one interviews with 600 individuals from the public. Then, we conducted descriptive statistical analyses (i.e., frequency, percentage, and averages) on the questionnaire items. Furthermore, we examined the individual differences of participants' sociodemographic characteristics in their responses to the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The general public's awareness regarding accreditation programs for healthcare organizations was still low (47.4%). Nearly 60% of participants said that they did not agree with the practice of telling their own names and dates of birth before treatment. Approximately 80% of the participants would not ask medical staff to confirm washing their hands. Only half of the participants were aware of medical dispute mediation and arbitration programs. Nearly 90% of the participants agreed that patient safety is important. However, on participants' confidence in making the correct choice and safety in their treatment, the average score was 68.7 of 100 points. Participants tended to be less confident about engaging in patient safety activities if they were older, less educated, or had poor health status.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants in this study believed that patient safety is an important issue, but they were not confident about choosing the correct medical institution or about receiving safe treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究通过调查,考察韩国公众对患者参与患者安全的看法,并确定公众参与患者安全教育的弱势群体和内容重点。

方法

我们根据以往的研究制定了一份问卷,并对 600 名公众进行了一对一的访谈。然后,我们对问卷项目进行了描述性统计分析(即频率、百分比和平均值)。此外,我们还检查了参与者社会人口特征在回答问卷时的个体差异。

结果

公众对医疗机构认证项目的认知度仍然较低(47.4%)。近 60%的参与者表示,他们不同意在治疗前告知自己的姓名和出生日期。大约 80%的参与者不会要求医务人员确认洗手。只有一半的参与者知道医疗纠纷调解和仲裁程序。近 90%的参与者认为患者安全很重要。然而,在参与者对做出正确选择和治疗安全的信心方面,平均得分为 100 分中的 68.7 分。年龄较大、受教育程度较低或健康状况较差的参与者参与患者安全活动的信心较低。

结论

本研究的参与者认为患者安全是一个重要问题,但他们对选择正确的医疗机构或接受安全的治疗没有信心。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Public Perception Regarding Patient Engagement for Patient Safety in Korea.
J Patient Saf. 2021 Jan 1;17(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000565.
6
Patient Safety Incidents Reported by the General Public in Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study.
J Patient Saf. 2020 Jun;16(2):e90-e96. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000509.
9
[Analysis of Subgroups with Lower Level of Patient Safety Perceptions Using Decision-Tree Analysis].
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020 Oct;50(5):686-698. doi: 10.4040/jkan.20044.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Participation in Patient Safety Practices Scale: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Scale.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;13(12):1387. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121387.
2
The public's perceptions of patient safety in healthcare.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 May 23;14(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00691-7.
3
Qualitative Comparison of Perceptions Regarding Patient Engagement for Patient Safety by Physicians, Nurses, and Patients.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jun 4;18:1065-1075. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S456050. eCollection 2024.
5
The effects of a mobile application for patient participation to improve patient safety.
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1601-1618. doi: 10.1111/hex.13503. Epub 2022 May 11.
6
Patients and relatives as auditors of safe practices in oncology and hematology day hospitals.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06018-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Dispute cases related to pain management in Korea: analysis of Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency data.
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Jan 31;15(1):96-102. doi: 10.17085/apm.2020.15.1.96.
2
Increasing the use of patient decision aids in orthopaedic care: results of a quality improvement project.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 May;27(5):347-354. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007019. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
3
Evaluation of Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Medication Safety.
Patient. 2018 Apr;11(2):193-206. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0270-8.
4
Outcomes of Adding Patient and Family Engagement Education to Fall Prevention Bundled Interventions.
J Nurs Care Qual. 2017 Jul/Sep;32(3):252-258. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000232.
5
Med Wise: A theory-based program to improve older adults' communication with pharmacists about their medicines.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 Jul-Aug;12(4):569-77. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
7
i Engaging as an innovative approach to engage patients in their own fall prevention care.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 May 13;8:693-700. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S62746. eCollection 2014.
8
The Relationship Between Patient Safety Culture and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
J Patient Saf. 2015 Sep;11(3):135-42. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000058.
9
Promoting engagement by patients and families to reduce adverse events in acute care settings: a systematic review.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jul;23(7):548-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001769. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
10
Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):742-50. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002141. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验