Alhailiy Ali B, Ekpo Ernest U, Kench Peter L, Ryan Elaine A, Brennan Patrick C, McEntee Mark
1 The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Medical Radiation Science , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
2 Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University , Al-Kharj , Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Br J Radiol. 2019 Apr;92(1096):20180793. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180793. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
: This study aimed to examine the associated factors for dose variation and influence cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) dose benchmarks in current CT imaging centres.
: A questionnaire was distributed to CT centres across Australia and Saudi Arabia. All participating centres collected data for adults who underwent a CCTA procedure. The questionnaire gathered information about the examination protocol, scanning parameters, patient parameters, and volume CT dose index (CTDI vol) and dose-length product (DLP). A stepwise regression analysis was performed to assess the contribution of tube voltage (kV), padding time technique, cross-sectional area (CSA) of chest and weight to DLP.
: A total of 17 CT centres provided data for 423 CCTA examinations. The median CTDI, DLP and effective dose were 18 mGy, 256 mGy.cm and 5.2 mSv respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in DLP between retrospective and prospective ECG-gating modes (p = 0.001). Median DLP from CCTA using padding technique was 61% higher than CCTA without padding (p = 0.001). The stepwise regression showed that kV was the most significant predictor of DLP followed by padding technique then CSA while patient weight did not statistically significantly predict DLP. Correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation between weight and CSA (r = 0.78), and there was a moderate positive correlation between weight and DLP (r = 0.42), as well as CSA and DLP (r = 0.48).
: Findings show radiation dose variations for CCTA. The associated factors for dose variation found in this study are scanning mode, kV, padding time technique and CSA of the chest. This results support the need to include CSA measurements in future dose survey and for setting DRLs.
: The study provides baseline information that helps to understand the associated factors for dose variations and high doses within and between centres performing CCTA.
本研究旨在探讨当前CT成像中心剂量变化的相关因素以及对心脏CT血管造影(CCTA)剂量基准的影响。
向澳大利亚和沙特阿拉伯的CT中心发放了问卷。所有参与中心收集了接受CCTA检查的成人的数据。问卷收集了有关检查方案、扫描参数、患者参数以及容积CT剂量指数(CTDI vol)和剂量长度乘积(DLP)的信息。进行逐步回归分析以评估管电压(kV)、填充时间技术、胸部横截面积(CSA)和体重对DLP的贡献。
共有17个CT中心提供了423例CCTA检查的数据。CTDI、DLP和有效剂量的中位数分别为18 mGy、256 mGy.cm和5.2 mSv。回顾性和前瞻性心电图门控模式之间的DLP存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.001)。使用填充技术的CCTA的DLP中位数比未使用填充的CCTA高61%(p = 0.001)。逐步回归显示,kV是DLP的最显著预测因子,其次是填充技术,然后是CSA,而患者体重对DLP没有统计学显著预测作用。相关性分析显示体重与CSA之间存在强正相关(r = 0.78),体重与DLP之间存在中度正相关(r = 0.42),以及CSA与DLP之间存在中度正相关(r = 0.48)。
研究结果显示CCTA存在辐射剂量变化。本研究中发现的剂量变化相关因素为扫描模式、kV、填充时间技术和胸部CSA。这些结果支持在未来剂量调查中纳入CSA测量以及设定剂量参考水平(DRL)的必要性。
该研究提供了基线信息,有助于了解进行CCTA的中心内部和之间剂量变化及高剂量的相关因素。