• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我们并非不孕”:巴西圣保罗的女同性恋者在寻求受孕服务时面临的挑战和限制。

'We are not infertile': challenges and limitations faced by women in same-sex relationships when seeking conception services in São Paulo, Brazil.

机构信息

Department of Health, Life Cycles and Society, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Institute for Global Health, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Cult Health Sex. 2019 Nov;21(11):1257-1272. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1556343. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1080/13691058.2018.1556343
PMID:30633635
Abstract

The use of reproductive technologies has expanded beyond cases of infertility, and opportunities for individuals of different sexual orientations to use such technologies for conception have increased. The authors examined the challenges and limitations faced by women in same-sex relationships seeking conception services in São Paulo, Brazil. They interviewed 16 women in same-sex relationships who conceived children using reproductive technologies. Access to public health services for conception remains limited and exclusive to infertile heterosexual couples. Women in same-sex relationships are forced to select between costly medical treatments in the private sector, or self-insemination with sperm from a known donor. In this study, individuals reported that they experienced adverse effects of treatments; were treated with technologies for infertility when they were, in fact, fertile; and were exposed to unnecessary and invasive interventions. Growing political conservatism and the reduction of investment in public health services are factors that can directly affect sexual and reproductive health, including that of lesbians. Public policies that enable same-sex couples to conceive have yet to be developed in many countries, and a clearer articulation of the right to evidence-informed, rights-based care, consistent with national and international guidelines is a much-needed next step.

摘要

生殖技术的应用已经超越了不孕不育的范畴,不同性取向的个体使用这些技术来实现受孕的机会也有所增加。作者研究了在巴西圣保罗,寻求受孕服务的女同性恋者在这方面所面临的挑战和限制。他们采访了 16 名使用生殖技术受孕的女同性恋者。获得公共卫生服务来实现受孕的机会仍然有限,且仅限于不孕的异性恋夫妇。女同性恋者被迫在昂贵的私人医疗和自我授精(使用已知捐赠者的精子)之间做出选择。在这项研究中,个人报告说他们经历了治疗的不良反应;明明有生育能力却被当作不孕不育来治疗;还遭受了不必要的和侵入性的干预。政治上的保守主义日益增强,以及对公共卫生服务投资的减少,这些都是直接影响性健康和生殖健康的因素,包括女同性恋者。许多国家尚未制定允许同性伴侣受孕的公共政策,下一步急需制定更明确的、以证据为基础的、基于权利的护理权,这符合国家和国际准则。

相似文献

1
'We are not infertile': challenges and limitations faced by women in same-sex relationships when seeking conception services in São Paulo, Brazil.“我们并非不孕”:巴西圣保罗的女同性恋者在寻求受孕服务时面临的挑战和限制。
Cult Health Sex. 2019 Nov;21(11):1257-1272. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1556343. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
2
The acceptability of stem cell-based fertility treatments for different indications.基于干细胞的生育治疗对不同适应症的可接受性。
Mol Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec 1;23(12):855-863. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gax027.
3
Use, access, and equity in health care services in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗医疗服务的使用、可及性与公平性。
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 May 18;33(4):e00078015. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00078015.
4
Infertility: a health problem in the Muslim world.不孕不育:穆斯林世界的一个健康问题。
Popul Sci. 1991 Jan;10:41-58.
5
The long-term prognosis for live birth in couples initiating fertility treatments.夫妇开始进行生育治疗时活产的长期预后。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1439-1449. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex096.
6
Utilization of fertility treatment and reproductive choices by lesbian couples.女同性恋伴侣的生育治疗利用和生殖选择。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Dec;106(7):1709-1713.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.050. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
7
Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.人类辅助生殖后的妊娠结局
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jan;36(1):64-83. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30685-X.
8
The search for the principle of justice for infertile couples: characterization of the brazilian population and bioethical discussion.寻找不孕夫妇的正义原则:巴西人口特征与生物伦理探讨。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Sep 4;24(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00947-4.
9
Choreographies of sperm donations: dilemmas of intimacy in lesbian couple donor conception.舞出精子捐赠的舞步:女同性恋伴侣供精受孕中亲密关系的困境
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Dec;73(11):1661-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.033. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
10
How well are lesbians treated in UK fertility clinics?英国生育诊所对女同性恋者的治疗情况如何?
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2015 Sep;18(3):194-9. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2015.1043654. Epub 2015 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Homoparenting as a public health issue: a scoping review.同性家长育儿:公共卫生问题视角下的综述研究
Rev Saude Publica. 2023 Nov 3;57:80. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005447. eCollection 2023.
2
The Pathway of Female Couples in a Fertility Clinic.生育诊所中女同性恋伴侣的生育途径。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Jul;44(7):660-666. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744444. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
3
Building Families Through Healthcare: Experiences of Lesbians Using Reproductive Services.通过医疗保健组建家庭:女同性恋者使用生殖服务的经历。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Mar 28;9:23743735221089459. doi: 10.1177/23743735221089459. eCollection 2022.
4
Cross-border reproductive healthcare attitudes and behaviours among women living in Florence, Italy.意大利佛罗伦萨地区跨境生育医疗保健态度和行为的女性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 22;22(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07621-2.