Energy Technology, Department of Space, Earth and Environment , Chalmers University of Technology , 41296 Gothenburg , Sweden.
The Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research (CSPR), Department of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change , Linköping University , 58183 Linköping , Sweden.
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Feb 5;53(3):1690-1697. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05243. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
The transport sector is often seen as the most difficult sector to decarbonize. In recent years, so-called electrofuels have been proposed as one option for reducing emissions. Electrofuels-here defined as fuels made from electricity, water, and carbon dioxide-can potentially help manage variations in electricity production, reduce the need for biofuels in the transportation sector while utilizing current infrastructure, and be of use in sectors where fuel switching is difficult, such as shipping. We investigate the cost-effectiveness of electrofuels from an energy system perspective under a climate mitigation constraint (either 450 or 550 ppm of CO in 2100), and we find the following: (i) Electrofuels are unlikely to become cost-effective unless options for storing carbon are very limited; in the most favorable case modeled-an energy system without carbon storage and with the more stringent constraint on carbon dioxide emissions-they provide approximately 30 EJ globally in 2070 or approximately 15% of the energy demand from transport. (ii) The cost of the electrolyzer and increased availability of variable renewables appear not to be key factors in whether electrofuels enter the transport system, in contrast to findings in previous studies.
交通运输部门通常被认为是最难实现脱碳的部门。近年来,所谓的电燃料作为减少排放的一种选择被提了出来。电燃料——这里定义为通过电力、水和二氧化碳制成的燃料——可以帮助管理电力生产的变化,减少交通运输部门对生物燃料的需求,同时利用现有基础设施,并在燃料转换困难的部门(如航运)发挥作用。我们从能源系统的角度,在气候缓解的限制下(2100 年时 CO 浓度为 450 或 550ppm),研究了电燃料的成本效益,结果如下:(i)除非碳储存选项非常有限,否则电燃料不太可能具有成本效益;在最有利的情况下——一个没有碳储存且对二氧化碳排放有更严格限制的能源系统——它们在 2070 年提供的全球能源约为 30 艾焦耳,约占交通部门能源需求的 15%。(ii)与之前的研究结果相反,电解槽的成本和更丰富的可变可再生能源的可用性似乎不是电燃料进入交通系统的关键因素。