• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单切口迷你吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁患者的长期疗效及对生活质量的影响

Long-term outcomes and quality of life effects of single incision mini sling procedure in stress urinary incontinence patients.

作者信息

Golbasi Ceren, Taner Cuneyt Eftal, Golbasi Hakan

机构信息

Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Health University of Health Sciences Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Turkey.

Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Health University of Health Sciences Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Mar;234:10-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.12.030. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.12.030
PMID:30634093
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and quality of life of patients who underwent single incision minisling (SIMS) procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

62 patients who were diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and received treatment with SIMS procedure (Ophira, Promedon, Argentina) were included in the study. Mean age was 50.73 ± 9.28 years and mean follow-up duration after surgery was 30.68 ± 7.52 months. Preoperative urological and gynecological features of the patients were recorded. Gynecological examination, pelvic ultrasonography, stress test, Q-tip test, cystometry were performed and incontinence and quality of life questionnaires (ICIQ-SF, IIQ-7, UDI-6, VAS-QOL, FSFI) were completed by all patients before and after the operation.

RESULTS

Stress urinary incontinence was observed in all patients during pre-op evaluations. 62 patients aged between 35-85 (mean age 50.73 ± 9.28) years were included and follow up duration ranged between 12-44 (average 30.68 ± 7.52) months. In regard to patient evaluations, 27 patients (43.5%) felt that the surgery was very effective, 25 (40.3%) felt surgery was effective and 10 (16.1%) did not report any difference after surgery. In the long-term postoperative follow up; 2 (3.2%) patients had dyspareunia and 7 (11.3%) patients had vaginal tape erosions which were diagnosed 2-40 months postoperatively. According to Q-tip test results, proximal urethral mobility was significantly decreased after surgery. All questionnaire scores were also significantly improved at post-operative evaluations. (P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that the Ophira mini sling technique provided high subjective cure rate and improved symptoms and quality of life in patients with SUI. These results suggest that the single incision mini sling procedure is an advisable alternative to other surgical procedures due to its low complication rates and ease of learning and applying the procedure. This procedure also demonstrated excellent tolerability, minimal pain, low morbidity and increased quality of life scores, in ICIQ-SF, IIQ-7, UDI-6, VAS-QOL, FSFI.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估接受单切口迷你吊带术(SIMS)的患者的长期疗效和生活质量。

研究设计

本研究纳入了62例被诊断为压力性尿失禁(SUI)并接受SIMS手术(Ophira,Promedon,阿根廷)治疗的患者。平均年龄为50.73±9.28岁,术后平均随访时间为30.68±7.52个月。记录患者术前的泌尿外科和妇科特征。所有患者在手术前后均进行妇科检查、盆腔超声检查、压力测试、Q-tip测试、膀胱测压,并完成失禁和生活质量问卷(ICIQ-SF、IIQ-7、UDI-6、VAS-QOL、FSFI)。

结果

术前评估时所有患者均存在压力性尿失禁。纳入62例年龄在35 - 85岁(平均年龄50.73±9.28)的患者,随访时间为12 - 44个月(平均30.68±7.52个月)。关于患者评估,27例(43.5%)患者认为手术非常有效,25例(40.3%)患者认为手术有效,10例(16.1%)患者术后未报告有任何差异。在术后长期随访中,2例(3.2%)患者出现性交困难,7例(11.3%)患者出现阴道吊带侵蚀,均在术后2 - 40个月被诊断出来。根据Q-tip测试结果,术后近端尿道活动度显著降低。术后评估时所有问卷评分也均显著改善(P < 0.001)。结论:我们的研究证实,Ophira迷你吊带技术在SUI患者中提供了较高的主观治愈率,并改善了症状和生活质量。这些结果表明,单切口迷你吊带术因其低并发症发生率以及易于学习和应用,是其他手术方法的一个可取替代方案。该手术在ICIQ-SF、IIQ-7、UDI-6、VAS-QOL、FSFI方面还表现出了良好的耐受性、最小的疼痛、低发病率以及生活质量评分的提高。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes and quality of life effects of single incision mini sling procedure in stress urinary incontinence patients.单切口迷你吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁患者的长期疗效及对生活质量的影响
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Mar;234:10-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.12.030. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
2
Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.单切口微型吊带与标准合成中段尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:SIMS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(47):1-190. doi: 10.3310/BTSA6148.
3
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
4
Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial.无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O)与单切口无张力阴道吊带(Ajust™)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效比较:一项为期1年的随访随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1497-505. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
6
[Efficacy of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence with mini-invasive single incision sling].[微创单切口吊带手术治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效]
Ceska Gynekol. 2015 Oct;80(5):345-50.
7
Mini Sling (Ophira) versus Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Medium-term Follow-up.用于治疗压力性尿失禁的迷你吊带(奥菲拉)与耻骨后阴道吊带:中期随访
Prague Med Rep. 2015;116(3):210-8. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2015.60.
8
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.压力性尿失禁女性经闭孔中尿道吊带与单切口吊带的前瞻性随机对照研究:1年随访研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):791-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
10
Short-term outcomes of adjustable single-incision sling (Ajust™) procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a prospective single-center study.可调节单切口吊带术(Ajust™)治疗压力性尿失禁的短期疗效:一项前瞻性单中心研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Mar;186:59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the efficacy of mini-sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence through patient-reported outcomes and transperineal ultrasonography.通过患者报告结局和经会阴超声评估迷你吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2025 Jun 10;26(2):98-108. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2024-8-7.
2
Single Incision Mini-Sling Versus Mid-Urethral Sling (Transobturator/Retropubic) in Females With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单切口迷你吊带术与女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带术(经闭孔/耻骨后)对比:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 Apr 18;15(4):e37773. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37773. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Three-year patient-reported outcomes of single-incision versus transobturator slings for female stress urinary incontinence are equivalent.
经单切口与经闭孔吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的 3 年患者报告结局相当。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Sep;34(9):2265-2274. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05538-w. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
Comparison of Two Single-Incision Mini-Slings for the Treatment of Incontinence.两种单切口迷你吊带治疗尿失禁的比较。
Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(1):85-91. doi: 10.1159/000511465. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
5
Single-incision midurethral sling shows less pain and similar success rate in a short-term follow-up compared to the transobturator tape method in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.在治疗压力性尿失禁方面,与经闭孔吊带术相比,单切口尿道中段吊带术在短期随访中疼痛较轻,成功率相似。
Turk J Urol. 2019 Oct 25;46(1):63-68. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.19105. Print 2020 Jan.