• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种两剂次免疫程序的十价肺炎球菌结合疫苗在尼泊尔儿童中的比较:一项开放性、随机、非劣效对照试验。

Comparison of two schedules of two-dose priming with the ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Nepalese children: an open-label, randomised non-inferiority controlled trial.

机构信息

Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.

Paediatric Research Unit, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;19(2):156-164. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30568-1. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30568-1
PMID:30635252
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nepalese infants receive ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) with a 1 month interval between priming doses for programmatic reasons. We aimed to investigate whether immune responses to PCV10 serotypes were non-inferior if the second priming dose of PCV10 was delivered at a 1 month interval as opposed to a 2 month interval.

METHODS

We did an open-label, randomised, parallel group trial in healthy Nepalese infants aged 40-60 days at Patan Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Children were eligible for inclusion if they were healthy, were born at more than or equal to 37 weeks' gestation, were residing in Kathmandu, and had not had any previous vaccinations other than BCG, and oral polio vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by means of a computer-generated list with randomly varying permuted block sizes accessed through a validated web-based interface, to receive PCV10 either at 6 weeks and 10 weeks of age (6 + 10 group) or at 6 weeks and 14 weeks of age (6 + 14 group), with both groups receiving a booster at 9 months of age. Laboratory staff, masked to study intervention, analysed serum samples for antibodies against PCV10 serotypes by ELISA. The primary outcome was to determine whether the 6 + 10 schedule was non-inferior to the 6 + 14 schedule at 9 months of age, on the basis of the proportion of infants with serotype-specific IgG greater than or equal to 0·35 μg/mL. Non-inferiority was established with a 10% margin, and the primary endpoint was measured in a modified intention-to-treat population, which included only participants who successfully had a blood sample collected. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02385513.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 21, 2015, and April 4, 2016, 304 Nepalese children were randomly assigned to either the 6 + 10 group (n=152) or the 6 + 14 group (n=152). At 9 months of age, the 6 + 10 schedule was non-inferior for serotype 5 (79 [55·2%] of 143 vs 78 [53·4%] of 146, difference 1·82% [95% CI -9·6 to 13·25], p=0·021), serotype 9V (66 [46·1%] of 143 vs 55 [37·6%] of 146, difference 8·48% [-2·84 to 19·8], p=0·001), serotype 14 (110 [77·4%] of 142 vs 110 [74·8%] of 147, difference 2·63% [-7·27 to 12·54], p=0·006), and serotype 19F (135 [95%] of 142 vs 146 [100%] of 146, difference -4·92% [-9·86 to 0], p=0·022). At the same timepoint, non-inferiority was not shown for serotype 1 (36 [25·1%] of 143 vs 42 [28·5%] of 147, difference -3·39% [95% CI -13·56 to 6·77], p=0·102), serotype 4 (70 [48·9%] of 143 vs 87 [59·1%] of 147, difference -10·23% [-21·64 to 1·18], p=0·516), serotype 6B (96 [67·1%] of 143 vs 114 [77·5%] of 147, difference -10·41% [-20·65 to -0·18], p=0·532), serotype 7F (99 [69·2%] of 143 vs 109 [74·1%] of 147, difference -4·91% [-15·26 to 5·42], p=0·168), serotype 18C (89 [62·2%] of 143 vs 114 [77·5%] of 147, difference -15·31% [-25·78 to -4·83], p=0·840), and serotype 23F (37 [25·8%] of 143 vs 41 [27·8%] of 147, difference -2·01% [-12·19 to 8·16], p=0·062). After the booster dose, at 10 months of age, there were no significant differences in immunogenicity (proportion of children with antibody greater than or equal to 0.35 μg/mL) for any of the ten serotypes, when comparing the two schedules. Serious adverse events occurred in 32 participants, 11 (7%) of 152 in the 6 + 10 group and 21 (14%) of 152 in the 6  +  14 group.

INTERPRETATION

The 6 week, 14 week, and 9 month schedule should be implemented where possible. However, post-booster responses, which are thought to drive herd immunity, were similar in the two schedules. Therefore, the 6 week, 10 week, and 9 month schedule is an alternative that can be used when logistically necessary, and is expected to provide herd protection.

FUNDING

Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.

摘要

背景

尼泊尔婴儿因计划原因,在接受基础免疫接种时,需在第 1 个月和第 3 个月之间间隔 1 个月接种 10 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV10)。我们旨在研究如果将第 2 次 PCV10 基础免疫接种的间隔时间从 2 个月缩短至 1 个月,那么针对 PCV10 血清型的免疫反应是否仍然具有非劣效性。

方法

我们在尼泊尔加德满都的帕坦医院进行了一项开放性、随机、平行分组试验,纳入年龄为 40-60 天的健康尼泊尔婴儿。符合纳入条件的婴儿需要满足以下标准:健康、胎龄大于或等于 37 周、居住在加德满都,且除卡介苗和口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗外,没有接受过任何其他疫苗接种。参与者按照 1:1 的比例随机分配(通过一个经过验证的网络界面访问的随机排列、大小可变的随机区组分配),分别在 6 周龄和 10 周龄(6+10 组)或 6 周龄和 14 周龄(6+14 组)时接受 PCV10 接种,两组均在 9 月龄时进行加强免疫。实验室工作人员对血清样本进行血清型特异性 IgG 抗体的酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)分析,分析结果设为盲态。主要结局是在 9 个月龄时,比较两组血清型特异性 IgG 抗体滴度大于或等于 0.35 μg/mL 的婴儿比例,判断 6+10 方案是否不劣于 6+14 方案。采用 10%的边际,确定非劣效性,主要终点在仅成功采集血样的改良意向治疗人群中进行测量。本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02385513。

发现

2015 年 8 月 21 日至 2016 年 4 月 4 日,304 名尼泊尔儿童被随机分配至 6+10 组(n=152)或 6+14 组(n=152)。在 9 个月龄时,6+10 方案对血清型 5(79[55.2%]例 143 例,78[53.4%]例 146 例,差值 1.82%[-9.6 至 13.25],p=0.021)、血清型 9V(66[46.1%]例 143 例,55[37.6%]例 146 例,差值 8.48%[-2.8 至 19.8],p=0.001)、血清型 14(110[77.4%]例 142 例,110[74.8%]例 147 例,差值 2.63%[-7.2 至 12.54],p=0.006)和血清型 19F(135[95%]例 142 例,146[100%]例 146 例,差值-4.92%[-9.8 至 0],p=0.022)的非劣效性得到证实。同时,在同一时间点,6+10 方案对血清型 1(36[25.1%]例 143 例,42[28.5%]例 147 例,差值 3.39%[-13.5 至 6.77],p=0.102)、血清型 4(70[48.9%]例 143 例,87[59.1%]例 147 例,差值-10.23%[-21.6 至 1.18],p=0.516)、血清型 6B(96[67.1%]例 143 例,114[77.5%]例 147 例,差值-10.41%[-20.6 至-0.18],p=0.532)、血清型 7F(99[69.2%]例 143 例,109[74.1%]例 147 例,差值-4.91%[-15.2 至 5.42],p=0.168)、血清型 18C(89[62.2%]例 143 例,114[77.5%]例 147 例,差值-15.31%[-25.7 至-4.83],p=0.840)和血清型 23F(37[25.8%]例 143 例,41[27.8%]例 147 例,差值-2.01%[-12.1 至 8.16],p=0.062)的非劣效性未得到证实。在加强免疫接种后,在 10 个月龄时,当比较两种方案时,对于这 10 种血清型中的任何一种,免疫原性(抗体滴度大于或等于 0.35 μg/mL 的儿童比例)均无显著差异。32 名参与者发生了严重不良事件,其中 6+10 组 11 例(7%),6+14 组 21 例(14%)。

解释

如果可能的话,应实施 6 周、14 周和 9 个月的方案。然而,在两种方案中,增强后的反应(被认为是驱动群体免疫的反应)相似。因此,当从后勤角度考虑时,6 周、10 周和 9 个月的方案是一个替代方案,预计可以提供群体保护。

资金

全球疫苗免疫联盟(Gavi)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two schedules of two-dose priming with the ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Nepalese children: an open-label, randomised non-inferiority controlled trial.两种两剂次免疫程序的十价肺炎球菌结合疫苗在尼泊尔儿童中的比较:一项开放性、随机、非劣效对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;19(2):156-164. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30568-1. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
Comparison of two-dose priming plus 9-month booster with a standard three-dose priming schedule for a ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Nepalese infants: a randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial.两种剂量初免加 9 个月加强免疫与标准三剂初免方案用于尼泊尔婴儿的 10 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗的比较:一项随机、对照、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Apr;15(4):405-14. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70007-1. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
3
Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of ten-valent versus 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines among infants in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a randomised controlled trial.越南胡志明市婴幼儿接种 10 价与 13 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和反应原性:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 May;19(5):497-509. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30734-5. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
4
Immunogenicity of a single-dose compared with a two-dose primary series followed by a booster dose of ten-valent or 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South African children: an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.南非儿童中一剂与两剂基础免疫序贯加强一剂 10 价或 13 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性比较:一项开放标签、随机、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(12):1426-1436. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30289-9. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
5
Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 13 delivered as one primary and one booster dose (1 + 1) compared with two primary doses and a booster (2 + 1) in UK infants: a multicentre, parallel group randomised controlled trial.13 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗作为一剂基础免疫和一剂加强免疫(1+1),与两剂基础免疫和一剂加强免疫(2+1)相比,在英国婴儿中的效果:一项多中心、平行组随机对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Feb;18(2):171-179. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30654-0. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
6
Immunogenicity of alternative ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedules in infants in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: results from a single-blind, parallel-group, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.越南胡志明市婴幼儿中不同十价肺炎球菌结合疫苗接种程序的免疫原性:一项单盲、平行分组、开放性、随机、对照试验的结果。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1415-1428. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30775-1. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
7
Immunogenicity and safety of a novel ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in healthy infants in The Gambia: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.在冈比亚健康婴儿中新型十价肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和安全性:一项 3 期、随机、双盲、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;21(6):834-846. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30735-0. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
8
Single priming and booster dose of ten-valent and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines and Streptococcus pneumoniae colonisation in children in South Africa: a single-centre, open-label, randomised trial.南非儿童接种 10 价和 13 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗的单次初免和加强免疫剂量与肺炎链球菌定植:一项单中心、开放性、随机试验。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 May;7(5):326-335. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00025-1. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
9
Persistence of Immunity Following 2-Dose Priming with a 10-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine at 6 and 10 Weeks or 6 and 14 Weeks of Age in Nepalese Toddlers.6 至 10 周和 6 至 14 周龄时,用 10 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗进行 2 剂初免后,尼泊尔幼儿的免疫持久性。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Oct 1;40(10):937-943. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003223.
10
Immunogenicity and safety of a 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine administered as a 2 + 1 schedule to healthy infants in The Gambia: a single-centre, double-blind, active-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial.10 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗在冈比亚健康婴儿中按照 2+1 程序接种的免疫原性和安全性:一项单中心、双盲、主动对照、随机、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 May;23(5):609-620. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00734-4. Epub 2023 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of interval between doses on response to vaccines.剂量间隔对疫苗反应的影响。
Vaccine. 2021 Dec 3;39(49):7123-7127. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.050. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
2
Immunogenicity of alternative ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedules in infants in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: results from a single-blind, parallel-group, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.越南胡志明市婴幼儿中不同十价肺炎球菌结合疫苗接种程序的免疫原性:一项单盲、平行分组、开放性、随机、对照试验的结果。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1415-1428. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30775-1. Epub 2021 Jun 23.