Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Mar;16(1):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-09895-w. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
The disciplines of ethics, science, and the law often conflict when it comes to determining the limits and boundaries of embryo research. Under current Australian law and regulations, and in various other jurisdictions, research conducted on the embryo in vitro is permitted up until day fourteen, after which, the embryo must be destroyed. Reproductive technology and associated research is rapidly advancing at a rate that contests current societal and ethical limits surrounding the treatment of the embryo. This has brought about the question of the adequacy of the fourteen-day rule and whether it is necessary for it be reconsidered and reformed. This paper will highlight some of the tensions that exist in ethics, science, and the law in relation to the extension of the rule. It will be concluded that any move to extend the rule must be accompanied by close consultation with the public as the ultimate stakeholders in how the future of reproductive technology is created, constructed, and contested.
当涉及到确定胚胎研究的限制和界限时,伦理学、科学和法律这三个学科往往会产生冲突。根据澳大利亚现行的法律和法规,以及其他各种司法管辖区的规定,在体外进行的胚胎研究允许进行到第十四天,之后,胚胎必须被销毁。生殖技术及其相关研究正在以一种速度迅速发展,这种速度挑战了当前围绕胚胎处理的社会和伦理限制。这就提出了关于第十四天规则是否充分,以及是否有必要重新考虑和改革这一规则的问题。本文将重点介绍在扩大这一规则方面,伦理学、科学和法律之间存在的一些紧张关系。结论是,任何扩大规则的举措都必须与公众进行密切协商,因为公众是生殖技术未来如何创造、构建和争论的最终利益相关者。