Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with interest in Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Exp Dermatol. 2019 Mar;28(3):254-260. doi: 10.1111/exd.13877. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is one of the most prevalent skin cancers, which lacks both a prognostic marker and a specific and lasting treatment, due to the complexity of the disease and heterogeneity of patients. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) in vivo analysis is a versatile approach offering immediate morphological information, enabling the identification of four primary cutaneous RCM CM types. Whether RCM CM types are associated with a specific protein and molecular genetic profiles at the tissue level remains unclear. The current pilot study was designed to identify potential correlations between RCM CM types and specific biological characteristics, combining immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular analyses. Eighty primary CMs evaluated at patient bedside with RCM (type 1 [19, 24%], type 2 [12, 15%], type 3 [7, 9%] and type 4 [42, 52%]) were retrospectively evaluated by IHC stains (CD271, CD20, CD31, cyclin D1), fluorescence in situ hybridization FISH for MYC gain and CDKN2A loss and molecular analysis for somatic mutations (BRAF, NRAS and KIT). RCM CM types correlated with markers of stemness property, density of intra-tumoral lymphocytic B infiltrate and cyclin D1 expression, while no significant association was found with blood vessel density nor molecular findings. RCM CM types show a different marker profile expression, suggestive of a progression and an increase in aggressiveness, according to RCM morphologies.
皮肤黑色素瘤 (CM) 是最常见的皮肤癌之一,由于疾病的复杂性和患者的异质性,既缺乏预后标志物,也缺乏特异性和持久的治疗方法。体内反射共聚焦显微镜 (RCM) 分析是一种多功能方法,提供即时的形态学信息,能够识别四种主要的皮肤 RCM CM 类型。RCM CM 类型是否与组织水平的特定蛋白质和分子遗传特征相关尚不清楚。本初步研究旨在通过免疫组织化学 (IHC) 和分子分析,确定 RCM CM 类型与特定生物学特征之间的潜在相关性。通过 RCM(1 型 [19,24%]、2 型 [12,15%]、3 型 [7,9%] 和 4 型 [42,52%])在患者床边评估了 80 例原发性 CM,并用 IHC 染色(CD271、CD20、CD31、细胞周期蛋白 D1)、荧光原位杂交 (FISH) 检测 MYC 增益和 CDKN2A 缺失以及体细胞突变 (BRAF、NRAS 和 KIT) 进行回顾性评估。RCM CM 类型与干性标志物、肿瘤内淋巴细胞 B 浸润密度和细胞周期蛋白 D1 表达相关,而与血管密度或分子发现无显著相关性。RCM CM 类型表现出不同的标志物表达模式,根据 RCM 形态学表现,提示进展和侵袭性增加。