Suppr超能文献

分化与趋同:死亡率方面的收入不平等在人生历程中如何变化?

Divergence and Convergence: How Do Income Inequalities in Mortality Change over the Life Course?

作者信息

Rehnberg Johan, Fors Stefan, Fritzell Johan

机构信息

Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden,

Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden,

出版信息

Gerontology. 2019 Jan 11:1-10. doi: 10.1159/000494082.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Do inequalities in health by income increase or decrease with age? The empirical evidence is not conclusive and competing theories arrive at different conclusions.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined inequality in mortality by income over the adult life course with longitudinal data on people aged 30-99 between the years 1990 and 2009. Each person was followed for 19 years.

METHODS

We used Swedish total population data with 5,011,414 individual observations. We calculated the probability of having died for ages between 31 and 99. This approach to calculating death risk incorporates selective mortality during the follow-up period into the measure. Age and year standardized income positions were calculated for all individuals. Inequality was assessed by comparing the top 10% income group and the bottom 10% income group. Relative inequality was measured by risk ratios (RR) and absolute inequality by percentage point differences.

RESULTS

The results showed that the highest relative income inequality in mortality was at age 56 for men (RR: 4.7) and at age 40 for women (RR: 4.1) with differing patterns across the younger age categories between the sexes. The highest absolute income inequality in mortality was found at age 78 for men (19% difference) and at age 89 for women (14% difference) with similar patterns for both sexes. Both measures of inequality decreased after the peak, with small or no inequalities above age 95. Income inequality in mortality remained in advanced age, with larger absolute inequalities in older ages and larger relative inequalities in younger ages.

CONCLUSION

The results for absolute and relative measures of inequality differed substantially; this highlights the importance of discussing and making an active choice of inequality measure. To explain and understand the patterns of inequality in mortality over the adult life course, we conclude that the "age-as-leveler" and "cumulative disadvantage" theories are best applied to an absolute measure of inequality.

摘要

背景

健康方面的收入不平等会随着年龄增长而增加还是减少?实证证据并不确凿,相互竞争的理论得出了不同的结论。

目的

本研究利用1990年至2009年间30至99岁人群的纵向数据,考察了成年人生存过程中收入导致的死亡率不平等情况。对每个人进行了19年的跟踪。

方法

我们使用了包含5,011,414条个体观测数据的瑞典总人口数据。我们计算了31岁至99岁之间的死亡概率。这种计算死亡风险的方法将随访期间的选择性死亡率纳入了测量之中。为所有个体计算了年龄和年份标准化的收入状况。通过比较收入最高的10%群体和收入最低的10%群体来评估不平等情况。相对不平等用风险比(RR)衡量,绝对不平等用百分点差异衡量。

结果

结果显示,男性死亡率方面最高的相对收入不平等出现在56岁(RR:4.7),女性出现在40岁(RR:4.1),不同性别在较年轻年龄组呈现出不同模式。男性死亡率方面最高的绝对收入不平等出现在78岁(差异为19%),女性出现在89岁(差异为14%),两性模式相似。两种不平等衡量指标在达到峰值后均下降,95岁以上的不平等较小或不存在。死亡率方面的收入不平等在高龄阶段依然存在,老年阶段的绝对不平等更大,年轻阶段的相对不平等更大。

结论

不平等的绝对和相对衡量指标结果存在显著差异;这凸显了讨论并积极选择不平等衡量指标的重要性。为了解释和理解成年人生存过程中死亡率不平等的模式,我们得出结论,“年龄作为均衡器”和 “累积劣势” 理论最适用于不平等的绝对衡量指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验