Cheng Mengling, Sommet Nicolas, Jopp Daniela S, Spini Dario
Swiss Centre of Expertise in Life Course Research, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lausanne, Eopolis 5797, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eur J Ageing. 2023 Aug 10;20(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s10433-023-00781-y.
Some studies show that the protective effect of higher income on health weakens with old age (age-as-leveller pattern), whereas others show that it strengthens with old age (cumulative advantage/disadvantage pattern). Many existing studies are limited in that they use single-country and/or single-timepoint designs. To overcome these limitations and better understand how the income-health gradient evolves in older age, we used cross-national and longitudinal data of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (2004-2019, N = 73,407) and the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011-2018, N = 10,067). We operationalised health using multimorbidity and three alternative indicators (functional disability, mobility disability, and memory). We performed Poisson growth curve modelling to capture the between-participant effects of age and the within-participant effects of aging. We obtained three consistent and robust findings for Europe (patterns were observed in most countries) and China. First, the protective effect of higher income on multimorbidity, functional disability, and mobility disability was weaker for older than for younger adults (between-participant age-as-leveller pattern). Second, only the protective effect of higher income on mobility disability weakened over the later life course (within-participant age-as-leveller pattern). Third, the protective effect of higher income on memory was stronger for older than for younger adults and strengthened over the later life course (between-participant and within-participant cumulative advantage/disadvantage pattern). Longitudinal data, growth curve modelling distinguishing the between-participant from within-participant effect, and adjustments for potential confounders based on the hypothesised causal structure enabled us to better navigate the landscape of causal inference. Findings suggest that the income-related gap in physical health but not in cognitive health narrows in old age for both Europe and China.
一些研究表明,较高收入对健康的保护作用会随着年龄增长而减弱(年龄平等化模式),而另一些研究则表明,这种作用会随着年龄增长而增强(累积优势/劣势模式)。许多现有研究存在局限性,因为它们采用的是单国和/或单时间点设计。为了克服这些局限性,并更好地理解老年阶段收入-健康梯度是如何演变的,我们使用了欧洲健康、年龄与退休调查(2004 - 2019年,N = 73407)以及中国健康与养老追踪调查(2011 - 2018年,N = 10067)的跨国和纵向数据。我们使用多病共存情况以及三个替代指标(功能残疾、行动能力残疾和记忆力)来衡量健康状况。我们进行了泊松增长曲线建模,以捕捉参与者之间年龄的影响以及参与者内部衰老的影响。我们在欧洲(大多数国家都观察到了这些模式)和中国获得了三个一致且稳健的发现。第一,较高收入对多病共存情况、功能残疾和行动能力残疾的保护作用,老年人比年轻人弱(参与者之间的年龄平等化模式)。第二,只有较高收入对行动能力残疾的保护作用在晚年生活过程中减弱(参与者内部的年龄平等化模式)。第三,较高收入对记忆力的保护作用老年人比年轻人强,且在晚年生活过程中增强(参与者之间和参与者内部的累积优势/劣势模式)。纵向数据、区分参与者之间和参与者内部影响的增长曲线建模,以及基于假设因果结构对潜在混杂因素的调整,使我们能够更好地进行因果推断。研究结果表明,欧洲和中国在老年阶段,与收入相关的身体健康差距缩小,但认知健康差距并未缩小。