• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受低剂量普拉格雷或氯吡格雷治疗的缺血和出血负担的时间过程。

Time Course of Ischemic and Bleeding Burden in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Randomized to Low-Dose Prasugrel or Clopidogrel.

机构信息

1 Division of Cardiology IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo Pavia Italy.

2 First Division of Cardiology Ospedale Niguarda Milano Italy.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 22;8(2):e010956. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010956.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.010956
PMID:30636561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6497351/
Abstract

Background Elderly patients have high ischemic and bleeding rates after acute coronary syndrome; however, the occurrence of these complications over time has never been studied. This study sought to characterize average daily ischemic rates ( ADIRs ) and average daily bleeding rates ( ADBRs ) over 1 year in patients aged >74 years with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who were randomized in the Elderly ACS 2 trial, comparing low-dose prasugrel (5 mg daily) with clopidogrel (75 mg daily). Methods and Results ADIRs and ADBRs were calculated as the total number of events, including recurrent events, divided by the number of patient-days of follow-up and assessed within different clinical phases: acute (0-3 days), subacute (4-30 days), and late (31-365 days). Generalized estimating equations were used to test the least squares mean differences for the pairwise comparisons of ADIRs and ADBRs and the pairwise comparison of clopidogrel versus prasugrel effects. Globally, ADIRs were 2.6 times (95% CI, 2.4-2.9) higher than ADBRs . ADIRs were significantly higher in the clopidogrel arm than in the low-dose prasugrel arm in the subacute phase ( P<0.001) without a difference in ADBRs ( P=0.35). In the late phase, ADIRs remained significantly higher with clopidogrel ( P<0.001), whereas ADBRs were significantly higher with low-dose prasugrel ( P<0.001). Conclusions Ischemic burden was greater than bleeding burden in all clinical phases of 1-year follow-up of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Low-dose prasugrel reduced ischemic events in the subacute and chronic phases compared with clopidogrel, whereas bleeding burden was lower with clopidogrel in the late phase. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01777503.

摘要

背景

老年急性冠状动脉综合征(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)患者发生缺血和出血的风险较高;然而,这些并发症随时间的发生情况从未被研究过。本研究旨在描述接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年 ACS 患者(年龄>74 岁)在 1 年期间平均每日缺血率(average daily ischemic rates,ADIRs)和平均每日出血率(average daily bleeding rates,ADBRs)的变化,该研究是 Elderly ACS 2 试验的一部分,比较了低剂量普拉格雷(每天 5mg)与氯吡格雷(每天 75mg)的疗效。

方法和结果

ADIRs 和 ADBRs 是通过将总事件数(包括复发性事件)除以随访患者天数计算得出的,并在不同的临床阶段进行评估:急性期(0-3 天)、亚急性期(4-30 天)和晚期(31-365 天)。采用广义估计方程比较 ADIRs 和 ADBRs 的最小二乘均数差异,并比较氯吡格雷与普拉格雷的疗效。总体而言,ADIRs 是 ADBRs 的 2.6 倍(95%置信区间,2.4-2.9)。在亚急性期,氯吡格雷组的 ADIRs 显著高于低剂量普拉格雷组(P<0.001),而两组的 ADBRs 无差异(P=0.35)。在晚期,氯吡格雷组的 ADIRs 仍显著升高(P<0.001),而低剂量普拉格雷组的 ADBRs 显著升高(P<0.001)。

结论

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者 1 年随访的所有临床阶段,缺血负担均大于出血负担。与氯吡格雷相比,低剂量普拉格雷在亚急性期和慢性期减少了缺血事件,而氯吡格雷在晚期出血负担较低。

临床试验注册网址

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT 01777503。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e5f/6497351/fd53bb6b7abc/JAH3-8-e010956-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e5f/6497351/04e850b7e59a/JAH3-8-e010956-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e5f/6497351/c14486944fae/JAH3-8-e010956-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e5f/6497351/fd53bb6b7abc/JAH3-8-e010956-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e5f/6497351/04e850b7e59a/JAH3-8-e010956-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e5f/6497351/c14486944fae/JAH3-8-e010956-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e5f/6497351/fd53bb6b7abc/JAH3-8-e010956-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Time Course of Ischemic and Bleeding Burden in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Randomized to Low-Dose Prasugrel or Clopidogrel.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受低剂量普拉格雷或氯吡格雷治疗的缺血和出血负担的时间过程。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 22;8(2):e010956. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010956.
2
Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗相关的缺血和出血事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004.
3
Comparison of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel and Standard-Dose Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Early Percutaneous Revascularization.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者行早期经皮血运重建术时,使用普拉格雷低剂量与氯吡格雷标准剂量的比较。
Circulation. 2018 Jun 5;137(23):2435-2445. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032180. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
4
Elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes managed without revascularization: insights into the safety of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy with reduced-dose prasugrel versus standard-dose clopidogrel.未进行血运重建治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征老年患者:探讨长期应用小剂量普拉格雷双联抗血小板治疗与标准剂量氯吡格雷相比的安全性。
Circulation. 2013 Aug 20;128(8):823-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002303. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
5
Tailoring Antiplatelet Therapy Intensity to Ischemic and Bleeding Risk.根据缺血和出血风险调整抗血小板治疗强度。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jan;12(1):e004945. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004945.
6
Nonculprit Lesion Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的罪犯病变外心肌梗死。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Mar 17;75(10):1095-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.067.
7
Characterization of the Average Daily Ischemic and Bleeding Risk After Primary PCI for STEMI.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后平均每日缺血和出血风险的特征。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 10;70(15):1846-1857. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.018.
8
Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Receiving an Oral Anticoagulant and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Comparison of Clopidogrel Versus Prasugrel From the TRANSLATE-ACS Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者接受口服抗凝和双联抗血小板治疗的结果:来自 TRANSLATE-ACS 研究的氯吡格雷与普拉格雷比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 21;8(14):1880-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.018.
9
Multicenter research of bleeding risk between prasugrel and clopidogrel in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.日本接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠心病患者中普拉格雷与氯吡格雷出血风险的多中心研究。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Oct;34(10):1581-1588. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01395-0. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
10
A randomised trial on platelet function-guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Rationale and design of the Testing Responsiveness to Platelet Inhibition on Chronic Antiplatelet Treatment for Acute Coronary Syndromes (TROPICAL-ACS) Trial.一项关于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者血小板功能引导下抗血小板治疗降阶梯的随机试验。急性冠状动脉综合征慢性抗血小板治疗中血小板抑制反应性测试(TROPICAL-ACS)试验的原理与设计。
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jan 5;117(1):188-195. doi: 10.1160/TH16-07-0557. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the elderly: the SENIOR-RITA trial.老年非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的治疗:SENIOR-RITA试验
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Apr 16;27(Suppl 3):iii131-iii136. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf031. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Ultrashort Versus 1-Year Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后超短期与1年双联抗血小板治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Feb 18;4(2):102496. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102496. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prasugrel in the Elderly.老年人使用普拉格雷
Circulation. 2018 Jun 5;137(23):2446-2449. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033952.
2
Risk Stratification for Bleeding in the Elderly with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Not So Simple.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者出血风险分层:并非如此简单。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Jun;118(6):949-952. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649519. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
High on-treatment platelet reactivity and outcome in elderly with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome - Insight from the GEPRESS study.治疗中血小板高反应性与老年非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的结局——来自 GEPRESS 研究的观察。
Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Older People: Comprehensive Review and Multidisciplinary Practice-Based Recommendations.
老年人急性冠状动脉综合征的管理:全面综述与基于多学科实践的建议。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 28;13(15):4416. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154416.
4
Sex-Based Outcomes of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗的性别结局:成对和网络荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2024 Jun;84(6):685-701. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02034-3. Epub 2024 May 29.
5
Pharmacotherapy for Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Aging Population.老龄化人口中的冠心病和急性冠脉综合征的药物治疗。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2024 Jul;26(7):231-248. doi: 10.1007/s11883-024-01203-9. Epub 2024 May 9.
6
Optimal anti-platelet therapy for older patients with acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials comprising 59,284 older patients.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者的最佳抗血小板治疗:包含 59284 例老年患者的随机试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Jan;57(1):143-154. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02875-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
7
De-escalation or abbreviation of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Consensus Statement from an international expert panel on coronary thrombosis.急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中双联抗血小板治疗的降级或缩短:来自冠状动脉血栓形成国际专家小组的共识声明。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Dec;20(12):830-844. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00901-2. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
8
Clinical impact of high platelet reactivity in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention on dual or triple antithrombotic therapy.心房颤动合并经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者血小板高反应性对双联或三联抗栓治疗的临床影响。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 May;55(4):667-679. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02784-z. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
9
Antiplatelet Strategies for Older Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Finding Directions in a Low-Evidence Field.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者的抗血小板策略:在低证据领域中寻找方向
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 6;12(5):2082. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052082.
10
Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.老年人群急性冠状动脉综合征的管理:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2023 Jan 17;147(3):e32-e62. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001112. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 15;259:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.057.
4
Pharmacodynamic Effects of Switching From Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Results of the SWAP-4 Study.从替格瑞洛转换为氯吡格雷对冠心病患者的药效学影响:SWAP-4 研究结果。
Circulation. 2018 Jun 5;137(23):2450-2462. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033983. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
5
Comparison of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel and Standard-Dose Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Early Percutaneous Revascularization.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者行早期经皮血运重建术时,使用普拉格雷低剂量与氯吡格雷标准剂量的比较。
Circulation. 2018 Jun 5;137(23):2435-2445. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032180. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
6
Benefit of Switching Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome According to On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity: The TOPIC-VASP Pre-Specified Analysis of the TOPIC Randomized Study.根据治疗中的血小板反应性评估,急性冠状动脉综合征后转换双联抗血小板治疗的获益:TOPIC-VASP 预先指定分析,TOPIC 随机研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 26;10(24):2560-2570. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.044.
7
Drug-eluting stents in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (SENIOR): a randomised single-blind trial.老年冠心病患者药物洗脱支架的研究(SENIOR):一项随机单盲试验
Lancet. 2018 Jan 6;391(10115):41-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32713-7. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
Characterization of the Average Daily Ischemic and Bleeding Risk After Primary PCI for STEMI.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后平均每日缺血和出血风险的特征。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 10;70(15):1846-1857. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.018.
9
Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的抗血小板治疗降级指导(TROPICAL-ACS):一项随机、开放标签、多中心试验。
Lancet. 2017 Oct 14;390(10104):1747-1757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32155-4. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
10
It Is Time to End the Dualistic Short Versus Long Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Debates.是时候结束关于双联抗血小板治疗短期与长期疗程的二元论争论了。
Circulation. 2017 Jun 20;135(25):2451-2453. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028497.