• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗相关的缺血和出血事件。

Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004
PMID:32239221
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7118520/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Prasugrel was approved at a lower dose in 2014 in Japan than in the West because East Asian patients are considered more susceptible to bleeding than Western patients. However, real-world outcomes with low-dose prasugrel treatment remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of low-dose prasugrel vs standard-dose clopidogrel administration with short-term outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study used data from the Japan Cardiovascular Database-Keio Interhospital Cardiovascular Studies registry, a large, ongoing, multicenter, retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent PCI. The present cohort study evaluated 2770 patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent PCI and received either low-dose prasugrel (loading dose, 20 mg; maintenance dose, 3.75 mg) or clopidogrel (loading dose, 300 mg; maintenance dose, 75 mg) in combination with aspirin between 2014 and 2018. Propensity score-matching analysis was conducted to balance the baseline characteristics of patients receiving low-dose prasugrel and those receiving clopidogrel. Data analysis was conducted in June 2019.

EXPOSURES

Prescription of either low-dose prasugrel or standard-dose clopidogrel prior to PCI.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary ischemic events (in-hospital death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke) and primary bleeding events, defined as bleeding complications within 72 hours after PCI consistent with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry definition.

RESULTS

Of 2559 patients included in the study, the mean (SD) age was 67.8 (12.7) years, and 78.2% were male. In total, 1297 patients (50.7%) received low-dose prasugrel, and 1262 patients (49.3%) received clopidogrel. After propensity score matching, primary ischemic events among patients receiving low-dose prasugrel and those receiving clopidogrel were comparable (odds ratio [OR], 1.42; 95% CI, 0.90-2.23), but primary bleeding events were significantly higher among patients receiving prasugrel (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.63-5.18). This increase in bleeding events was associated with the presence of a profile of high-bleeding risk (≥75 years of age, body weight <60 kg, or history of stroke or transient ischemic attack) (OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 1.86-8.97), being female (OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.05-14.0), or the presence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.05-4.09) or chronic kidney disease (OR, 4.78; 95% CI, 1.95-11.7).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Since its approval, low-dose prasugrel has been used by nearly 80% of patients who undergo PCI. Despite the modified dose, bleeding events were higher among patients receiving low-dose prasugrel than among patients receiving clopidogrel, with no difference in ischemic events between the 2 groups. These results suggest the importance of a risk assessment of bleeding prior to selecting a P2Y12 inhibitor, even for the use of a lower approved dose, when treating patients of East Asian descent.

摘要

重要性:2014 年,比伐卢定在日本的批准剂量低于西方,因为东亚患者被认为比西方患者更容易出血。然而,低剂量比伐卢定治疗的真实世界结果仍不清楚。

目的:研究急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,低剂量比伐卢定与标准剂量氯吡格雷给药与短期结局的相关性。

设计、地点和参与者:本研究使用了日本心血管数据库-庆应义塾大学医院心血管研究注册中心的数据,这是一个正在进行的、多中心、回顾性的连续患者队列研究,这些患者接受了 PCI。本队列研究评估了 2014 年至 2018 年间接受 PCI 并接受低剂量比伐卢定(负荷剂量 20mg;维持剂量 3.75mg)或氯吡格雷(负荷剂量 300mg;维持剂量 75mg)联合阿司匹林治疗的 2770 例急性冠状动脉综合征患者。进行了倾向评分匹配分析,以平衡接受低剂量比伐卢定和接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者的基线特征。数据分析于 2019 年 6 月进行。

暴露:PCI 前接受低剂量比伐卢定或标准剂量氯吡格雷的处方。

主要结局和测量:主要缺血事件(住院死亡、复发性心肌梗死和缺血性卒中)和主要出血事件,定义为 PCI 后 72 小时内与国家心血管数据注册 CathPCI 注册中心定义一致的出血并发症。

结果:在纳入的 2559 例患者中,平均(SD)年龄为 67.8(12.7)岁,78.2%为男性。共有 1297 例(50.7%)患者接受低剂量比伐卢定,1262 例(49.3%)患者接受氯吡格雷。经倾向评分匹配后,接受低剂量比伐卢定和氯吡格雷治疗的患者主要缺血事件相当(比值比 [OR],1.42;95%CI,0.90-2.23),但接受比伐卢定治疗的患者主要出血事件显著更高(OR,2.91;95%CI,1.63-5.18)。这种出血事件的增加与高出血风险特征(≥75 岁、体重<60kg 或有卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作史)(OR,4.08;95%CI,1.86-8.97)、女性(OR,3.84;95%CI,1.05-14.0)或 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(OR,2.07;95%CI,1.05-4.09)或慢性肾脏病(OR,4.78;95%CI,1.95-11.7)有关。

结论和相关性:自批准以来,近 80%接受 PCI 的患者使用了低剂量比伐卢定。尽管剂量有所调整,但与接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者相比,接受低剂量比伐卢定的患者出血事件更多,但两组之间的缺血事件无差异。这些结果表明,即使对于较低的批准剂量,在选择 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗东亚裔患者时,在选择之前进行出血风险评估非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29c5/7118520/deebbecf561d/jamanetwopen-3-e202004-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29c5/7118520/3ce86de4d8ca/jamanetwopen-3-e202004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29c5/7118520/fd8a9c02fa64/jamanetwopen-3-e202004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29c5/7118520/deebbecf561d/jamanetwopen-3-e202004-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29c5/7118520/3ce86de4d8ca/jamanetwopen-3-e202004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29c5/7118520/fd8a9c02fa64/jamanetwopen-3-e202004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29c5/7118520/deebbecf561d/jamanetwopen-3-e202004-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗相关的缺血和出血事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004.
2
Impact of reduced-dose prasugrel vs. standard-dose clopidogrel on in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in 62 737 patients with acute coronary syndromes: a nationwide registry study in Japan.在 62737 例急性冠脉综合征患者中,与标准剂量氯吡格雷相比,使用低剂量普拉格雷对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗住院结局的影响:一项日本全国注册研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020 Jul 1;6(4):231-238. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz056.
3
Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel and clopidogrel: a pre-specified exploratory analysis from the TROPICAL-ACS trial.普拉格雷和氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的血小板反应性与临床结局:TROPICAL-ACS 试验的预先设定探索性分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jun 21;40(24):1942-1951. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz202.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel, Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in ACS Patients Treated with PCI: A Propensity Score Analysis of the RENAMI and BleeMACS Registries.经 PCI 治疗的 ACS 患者中氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的疗效和安全性:RENAME 和 BleeMACS 注册研究的倾向评分分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2020 Jun;20(3):259-269. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00373-1.
5
Post percutaneous coronary interventional adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events observed with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: direct comparison through a meta-analysis.普拉格雷与氯吡格雷相比,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的不良心血管结局和出血事件:通过荟萃分析进行直接比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 2;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0820-6.
6
Multicenter research of bleeding risk between prasugrel and clopidogrel in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.日本接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠心病患者中普拉格雷与氯吡格雷出血风险的多中心研究。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Oct;34(10):1581-1588. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01395-0. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
7
Comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel-treated patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A propensity score-matched analysis of the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland (AMIS)-Plus Registry.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的比较:瑞士急性心肌梗死(AMIS)-Plus注册研究的倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016 Feb;5(1):13-22. doi: 10.1177/2048872614566946. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
8
Safety of Prasugrel Loading Doses in Patients Pre-Loaded With Clopidogrel in the Setting of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of a Nonrandomized Observational Study.在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中,患者预先使用氯吡格雷后给予普拉格雷负荷剂量的安全性:一项非随机观察性研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(8):1064-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.023.
9
Time Course of Ischemic and Bleeding Burden in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Randomized to Low-Dose Prasugrel or Clopidogrel.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受低剂量普拉格雷或氯吡格雷治疗的缺血和出血负担的时间过程。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 22;8(2):e010956. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010956.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Prasugrel Compared With Clopidogrel for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.普拉格雷与氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效及安全性比较
Am J Ther. 2016 Nov/Dec;23(6):e1637-e1643. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000096.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel in Asian Patients: The PROMISE-TW Registry.亚洲患者中低剂量普拉格雷的临床疗效与安全性:PROMISE-TW注册研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 15;14(16):5791. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165791.
2
Position Statement on Antiplatelet Therapy for East Asians With Coronary Artery Disease: 2025 Update.《2025年东亚冠状动脉疾病患者抗血小板治疗立场声明更新版》
JACC Asia. 2025 Jul;5(7):821-846. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.04.010.
3
Assessing the efficacy and safety of low dose clopidogrel in Chinese ACS patients undergoing PCI: A retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI.替格瑞洛联合或不联合阿司匹林用于 PCI 术后高危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2032-2042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908419. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
2
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1524-1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908973. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
3
JCS 2018 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome.《日本循环学会2018年急性冠状动脉综合征诊断与治疗指南》
评估低剂量氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 30;104(22):e42551. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042551.
4
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Taiwanese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.台湾急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用低剂量普拉格雷的临床疗效与安全性
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 27;13(23):7221. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237221.
5
Potent P2Y Inhibitor Selection and De-escalation Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中强效P2Y抑制剂的选择与降阶梯策略:系统评价与荟萃分析
CJC Open. 2023 Dec 5;6(5):677-688. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.11.024. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Sex Differences in Bleeding Risk Associated With Antithrombotic Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗栓治疗相关出血风险的性别差异
Circ Rep. 2024 Mar 5;6(4):99-109. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0015. eCollection 2024 Apr 10.
7
Acute coronary syndrome management in hemophiliacs: How to maintain balance?: A review.血友病患者的急性冠状动脉综合征管理:如何保持平衡?:综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Mar 17;102(11):e33298. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033298.
8
A HANC Risk Stratification Score for Antiplatelet Therapy Optimization with Low-Dose Prasugrel in Taiwanese Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients from the Switch Study.台湾急性冠状动脉综合征患者从转换研究中得出的用于低剂量普拉格雷优化抗血小板治疗的HANC风险分层评分
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2022 Nov;38(6):751-764. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202211_38(6).20220702A.
9
Pragmatic Clinical Studies: An Emerging Clinical Research Discipline for Improving Evidence-Based Practice of Cardiovascular Diseases in Asia.实用临床研究:亚洲改善心血管疾病循证实践的新兴临床研究学科。
Korean Circ J. 2022 Jun;52(6):401-413. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0100.
10
A Japanese Dose of Prasugrel versus a Standard Dose of Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction from the K-ACTIVE Registry.K-ACTIVE注册研究:日本剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性心肌梗死患者的比较
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 4;11(7):2016. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072016.
Circ J. 2019 Apr 25;83(5):1085-1196. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0133. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
4
Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial.替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗 1 个月,随后替格瑞洛单药治疗 23 个月,与阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛治疗 12 个月,随后药物洗脱支架植入后阿司匹林单药治疗 12 个月:一项多中心、开放标签、随机优效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):940-949. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31858-0. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
5
The relationship between timing of prasugrel pretreatment and in-stent thrombus immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: an optical coherence tomography study.急性冠状动脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后普拉格雷预处理时机与支架内血栓形成的关系:一项光学相干断层扫描研究
Heart Vessels. 2018 Oct;33(10):1159-1167. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1167-8. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
6
Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药在亚洲房颤患者中的有效性和安全性
Stroke. 2017 Nov;48(11):3040-3048. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018773. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
8
Comparison of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing successful revascularization.普拉格雷与氯吡格雷在成功进行血运重建的韩国急性心肌梗死患者中的比较。
J Cardiol. 2018 Jan;71(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
9
Impact of Institutional and Operator Volume on Short-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the Japanese Nationwide Registry.机构和术者量对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗短期结局的影响:来自日本全国登记的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 8;10(9):918-927. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.015.
10
Contemporary Trends and Outcomes Associated With the Preprocedural Use of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者术前使用口服P2Y12抑制剂的当代趋势及结果:来自密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管联盟(BMC2)的见解
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Oct;29(10):340-351. Epub 2017 Apr 15.