Clinical Prevention Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Mar;95(2):102-107. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053652. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
Internet-based HIV testing offers the potential to address privacy-related barriers to testing and increase frequency of testing but may result in missed opportunities related to sexual health education and prevention that typically occur in face-to-face encounters. In this study, we assessed the HIV test knowledge and sexual risk behaviour of clients testing for HIV through , an internet-based sexually transmitted and bloodborne infection testing platform inclusive of HIV testing, in comparison to clients testing through a large sexual health clinic.
We concurrently recruited clients and clinic clients from Vancouver, Canada, over the course of a 10-month period during 2015-2016. Participants completed baseline and 3-month questionnaires, anonymous and online. A six-item score was used to estimate knowledge of HIV test concepts typically conveyed during an HIV pretest encounter in a clinic. We used multiple regression to estimate associations between testing modality (online vs clinic based) and two outcomes-HIV test knowledge and change in condom use pre/post-test-with adjustment for relevant background factors.
Among 352 participants, online testers demonstrated higher HIV post-test knowledge than clinic-based testers (mean score 4.65/6 vs 4.09/6; p<0.05); this difference was reduced in adjusted analysis (p>0.05). Men who have sex with men, clients with a university degree, those who have lived in Canada >10 years and English speakers had higher HIV post-test knowledge (p<0.05). Eighteen per cent of online testers and 10% of clinic-based testers increased condom use during the 3 months post-test (p>0.05).
In this comparative study between online and clinic-based testers, we found no evidence of decreased HIV test knowledge or decreased condom use following HIV testing through . Our findings suggest that with careful design and attention to educational content, online testing services may not lead to missed opportunities for HIV education and counselling.
基于互联网的 HIV 检测有可能解决与检测相关的隐私障碍,并增加检测频率,但可能会错过通常在面对面接触中发生的与性健康教育和预防相关的机会。在这项研究中,我们评估了通过 ,即一个包含 HIV 检测的基于互联网的性传播和血源感染检测平台,进行 HIV 检测的客户的 HIV 检测知识和性风险行为,与通过大型性健康诊所进行检测的客户进行比较。
我们在 2015 年至 2016 年期间,同时从加拿大温哥华招募了 通过 和诊所进行 HIV 检测的客户。参与者在基线和 3 个月时完成了匿名和在线问卷。使用六分制来估计通常在诊所进行 HIV 检测前接触中传达的 HIV 检测概念的知识。我们使用多元回归来估计检测模式(在线与基于诊所)与两个结果 - HIV 检测知识和检测前后避孕套使用的变化之间的关联,调整了相关背景因素。
在 352 名参与者中,在线测试者的 HIV 后测知识得分高于基于诊所的测试者(平均得分 4.65/6 与 4.09/6;p<0.05);调整分析后(p>0.05),这种差异减小了。男男性行为者、具有大学学历的客户、在加拿大居住超过 10 年的人和说英语的人具有更高的 HIV 后测知识(p<0.05)。18%的在线测试者和 10%的基于诊所的测试者在检测后 3 个月内增加了避孕套的使用(p>0.05)。
在这项在线和基于诊所测试者的比较研究中,我们没有发现通过 进行 HIV 检测后 HIV 检测知识或避孕套使用减少的证据。我们的研究结果表明,通过精心设计和关注教育内容,在线检测服务可能不会错过 HIV 教育和咨询的机会。