Suppr超能文献

基于互联网的诊断检测服务 GetCheckedOnline.com 的用户与加拿大温哥华性传播感染诊所的用户在性传播感染检测障碍方面的体验差异。

Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada.

机构信息

Clinical Prevention Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Mar;95(2):151-156. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053325. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Internet-based STI testing programmes may overcome barriers posed by in-clinic testing, though uptake could reflect social gradients. The role these services play in comparison to clinical testing services is unknown. We compared experiences of testing barriers between STI clinic clients to clients of GetCheckedOnline.com (GCO; where clients take a printed lab form to a lab).

METHODS

Our 10-month cross-sectional study was conducted after GCO was promoted to STI clinic clients and men who have sex with men (MSM). Clinic and GCO clients completed an online survey assessing testing barriers and facilitators; responses were compared using bivariate analysis (level of significance P<0.01; significant results below).

RESULTS

Compared with 321 clinic clients, the 73 GCO clients were more likely to be older (median 35 vs 30 years), MSM (45% vs 16%), be testing routinely (67% vs 39%), have delayed testing for any reason (76% vs 54%) and due to clinic distance (28% vs 9%), report delays due to wait times (50% vs 17%), embarrassment with testing (16% vs 6%), discomfort discussing sexual health where they usually go for testing (39% vs 22%), as well as discomfort discussing sexual history with (19% vs 5%) and fearing judgement from (30% vs 15%) any healthcare provider. GCO clients were less likely to have found clinic hours convenient (59% vs 77%) and clinic appointments easy to make (49% vs 66%), and more likely to report long wait times (50% vs 17%). We found no differences in technology skills/use.

CONCLUSIONS

In this urban setting, an internet-based testing service effectively engaged individuals experiencing testing barriers, with few social gradients in uptake. While some testing barriers could be addressed through increasing access to clinical services, others require social and structural changes, highlighting the importance of internet-based STI testing services to increasing test uptake.

摘要

目的

基于互联网的性传播感染检测项目可能克服临床检测带来的障碍,但参与度可能反映社会阶层的差异。这些服务与临床检测服务相比所发挥的作用尚不清楚。我们比较了性传播感染诊所客户和 GetCheckedOnline.com(GCO;客户将打印的实验室表格带到实验室)客户在检测障碍方面的体验。

方法

我们的 10 个月横断面研究在 GCO 向性传播感染诊所客户和男男性行为者(MSM)推广后进行。诊所和 GCO 客户完成了一项在线调查,评估了检测障碍和促进因素;使用双变量分析比较了应答(显著性水平 P<0.01;显著结果见下文)。

结果

与 321 名诊所客户相比,73 名 GCO 客户更有可能年龄较大(中位数 35 岁 vs 30 岁)、MSM(45% vs 16%)、常规检测(67% vs 39%)、因任何原因(76% vs 54%)和因诊所距离(28% vs 9%)而延迟检测、因等待时间而延迟检测(50% vs 17%)、对检测感到尴尬(16% vs 6%)、在通常进行检测的地方讨论性健康时感到不适(39% vs 22%)、以及在与(19% vs 5%)和担心任何医疗保健提供者的评判(30% vs 15%)方面感到不适。GCO 客户更不可能认为诊所的营业时间方便(59% vs 77%),预约方便(49% vs 66%),更有可能报告长时间等待(50% vs 17%)。我们发现技术技能/使用方面没有差异。

结论

在这个城市环境中,基于互联网的检测服务有效地吸引了那些面临检测障碍的个体,参与度几乎没有社会阶层差异。虽然可以通过增加对临床服务的获取来解决一些检测障碍,但其他障碍需要社会和结构变革,这凸显了互联网性传播感染检测服务对提高检测参与度的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe5/6580770/fcb0dfc79dce/sextrans-2017-053325f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验