Suppr超能文献

在上颌及下颌神经阻滞麻醉的不同阶段,比较传统麻醉给药系统和计算机化局部麻醉给药系统所感知到的焦虑和疼痛。

Comparison of anxiety and pain perceived with conventional and computerized local anesthesia delivery systems for different stages of anesthesia delivery in maxillary and mandibular nerve blocks.

作者信息

Aggarwal Kamal, Lamba Arundeep Kaur, Faraz Farrukh, Tandon Shruti, Makker Kanika

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Dec;18(6):367-373. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.6.367. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fear of local anesthesia (LA) is a significant impediment to dental care as many patients delay or avoid treatment to avert pain. Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLAD), with constant and controlled rate of flow, present a painless alternative. The present study aimed to compare anxiety and pain perceived with conventional and computerized systems, for different stages of anesthesia delivery when administering various nerve blocks.

METHODS

One hundred patients requiring bilateral LA participated in the study. One side was anesthetized using one system and the contralateral side was anesthetized using the other, in two separate appointments. Patients assigned anxiety scores on a 5-point scale and used the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain determination at needle insertion, during delivery of anesthetic solution, immediately after injection, and at the end of the periodontal procedure. Each patient's preference for the delivery system of future injections was also recorded.

RESULTS

Patients reported significantly lower anxiety levels with CCLAD compared to the syringe. Significantly lower mean VAS scores for anesthesia deposition, pain immediately after, and at the end of the periodontal procedure were also noted. However, pain at needle insertion was comparable between the two systems, with no statistical significance. Overall, 64.4% patients preferred CCLAD for future anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Lower pain perceived with CCLAD and higher preference for the system suggest that CCLAD should replace conventional syringes to allow pain-free dental treatment.

摘要

背景

对局部麻醉的恐惧是牙科治疗的一个重大障碍,因为许多患者会推迟或避免治疗以避免疼痛。计算机控制局部麻醉给药系统(CCLAD)具有恒定且可控的流速,是一种无痛替代方案。本研究旨在比较在进行各种神经阻滞时,传统系统和计算机化系统在麻醉给药不同阶段所带来的焦虑和疼痛感受。

方法

一百名需要双侧局部麻醉的患者参与了该研究。在两次单独的就诊中,一侧使用一种系统进行麻醉,另一侧使用另一种系统进行麻醉。患者用5分制对焦虑程度进行评分,并在针头插入时、麻醉剂溶液注射期间、注射后立即以及牙周治疗结束时使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)来确定疼痛程度。还记录了每位患者对未来注射给药系统的偏好。

结果

与注射器相比,患者报告使用CCLAD时焦虑水平显著更低。在麻醉剂注入、注射后立即以及牙周治疗结束时,平均VAS评分也显著更低。然而,两种系统在针头插入时的疼痛程度相当,无统计学意义。总体而言,64.4%的患者更倾向于在未来麻醉时使用CCLAD。

结论

CCLAD带来的疼痛更低且患者对该系统的偏好更高,这表明CCLAD应取代传统注射器以实现无痛牙科治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/134d/6323037/420237500077/jdapm-18-367-g001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery efficacy - a literature review.计算机控制局部麻醉给药的疗效——文献综述
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Aug;36(8):1066-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.05.012. Epub 2024 May 31.

本文引用的文献

5
Factors influencing the discomfort of intraoral needle penetration.影响口腔内进针不适感的因素。
Anesth Prog. 2005 Fall;52(3):91-4. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2005)52[91:FITDOI]2.0.CO;2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验