• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛在急性心肌梗死中的应用:权衡循证医学与可承受性

Ticagrelor Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Balancing Evidence-Based Medicine with Affordability.

作者信息

Walker Andrew L, Sorensen Teshia, Gabriel Paolo P, Sledge Tyler, Morshedzadeh Jack H, Owan Theophilus, Shah Rashmee U

机构信息

University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA.

University of Utah Health, Pharmacy Services, Salt Lake City, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2018 Dec;1(2):58-61. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1010. Epub 2018 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1002/jac5.1010
PMID:30637378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6326582/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Data from randomized controlled trials support a mortality benefit with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Many healthcare providers preferentially treat patients with AMI with ticagrelor. The goal of this study was to determine the association between out-of-pocket drug costs and ticagrelor continuation compared with switching to clopidogrel among patients hospitalized for AMI, following a pharmacist-led discussion on outpatient co-payment costs for ticagrelor.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A tertiary care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients hospitalized with AMI between February 15, 2015 and January 23, 2017, who were loaded with ticagrelor on presentation.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 143 patients with AMI loaded with ticagrelor, 70 (49%) switched to clopidogrel after cost discussion. The median monthly ticagrelor co-payment was $268.29 (interquartile range [IQR] $45-$350) for switchers, versus $18 (IQR $6-$24) for non-switchers (p<0.001). Patients with co-payments of $100/month or more were 3.4 times more likely to switch to clopidogrel (relative risk 3.41, 95% confidence interval 2.12 to 5.47), compared with patients with co-payments of less than $100/month.

CONCLUSIONS

Following a discussion of outpatient costs, half of patients with AMI switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel when given the choice.

摘要

研究目的

随机对照试验的数据表明,在急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中,替格瑞洛较氯吡格雷可降低死亡率。许多医疗服务提供者更倾向于用替格瑞洛治疗AMI患者。本研究的目的是确定在药师主导的关于替格瑞洛门诊自付费用的讨论之后,AMI住院患者的自付药物费用与继续使用替格瑞洛而非换用氯吡格雷之间的关联。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

一家三级医疗学术医学中心。

患者

2015年2月15日至2017年1月23日期间因AMI住院且入院时接受替格瑞洛负荷剂量治疗的患者。

主要结果

在143例接受替格瑞洛负荷剂量治疗的AMI患者中,70例(49%)在费用讨论后换用了氯吡格雷。换用者替格瑞洛的月自付费用中位数为268.29美元(四分位间距[IQR]为45 - 350美元),未换用者为18美元(IQR为6 - 24美元)(p<0.001)。月自付费用在100美元及以上的患者换用氯吡格雷的可能性是月自付费用低于100美元患者的3.4倍(相对风险3.41,95%置信区间2.12至5.47)。

结论

在讨论门诊费用后,一半的AMI患者在有选择的情况下从替格瑞洛换用了氯吡格雷。

相似文献

1
Ticagrelor Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Balancing Evidence-Based Medicine with Affordability.替格瑞洛在急性心肌梗死中的应用:权衡循证医学与可承受性
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2018 Dec;1(2):58-61. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1010. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
2
Angiographic outcomes in the PLATO Trial (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes).PLATO 试验(血小板抑制和患者结局)的血管造影结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):671-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.014.
3
Effect of Medication Co-payment Vouchers on P2Y12 Inhibitor Use and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Myocardial Infarction: The ARTEMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.药物共付券对心肌梗死患者使用 P2Y12 抑制剂和主要心血管不良事件的影响:ARTEMIS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 1;321(1):44-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19791.
4
Clinically significant bleeding with low-dose rivaroxaban versus aspirin, in addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in acute coronary syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial.在急性冠脉综合征(GEMINI-ACS-1)中,与低剂量利伐沙班加 P2Y12 抑制相比,加用阿司匹林导致临床显著出血:一项双盲、多中心、随机试验。
Lancet. 2017 May 6;389(10081):1799-1808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30751-1. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
5
P2Y12 Inhibitor Switching in Response to Routine Notification of CYP2C19 Clopidogrel Metabolizer Status Following Acute Coronary Syndromes.在急性冠状动脉综合征(acute coronary syndromes)发生后,根据 CYP2C19 氯吡格雷代谢物状态的常规通知,进行 P2Y12 抑制剂的转换。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;4(7):680-684. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1510.
6
1-Year Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty for Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 1 年结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 30;71(4):371-381. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel after fibrinolytic therapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.溶栓治疗后 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者使用替卡格雷洛与氯吡格雷的比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Oct;46(3):299-303. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1706-2.
8
Direct healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness of acute coronary syndrome secondary prevention with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel: economic evaluation from the public payer's perspective in Poland based on the PLATO trial results.与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛用于急性冠状动脉综合征二级预防的直接医疗成本及成本效益:基于PLATO试验结果,从波兰公共支付方角度进行的经济学评估
Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(9):823-30. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2014.0106. Epub 2014 May 20.
9
Trends in Platelet Adenosine Diphosphate P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Use and Adherence Among Antiplatelet-Naive Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2008-2016.2008-2016 年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板药物初治患者中血小板二磷酸腺苷 P2Y12 受体抑制剂的使用和依从性趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):943-950. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0783.
10
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing successful revascularization; from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在成功进行血运重建的急性心肌梗死患者中的短期临床结局比较;来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究-国立卫生研究院。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;215:193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.044. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Discharge of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients on Sub-Optimal Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy: A Single Center Experience.急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受次优双联抗血小板治疗后的出院情况:单中心经验
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s10557-024-07563-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence and Causes for Early Ticagrelor Discontinuation: A "Real-World" Dutch Registry Experience.替格瑞洛早期停药的发生率及原因:一项荷兰“真实世界”注册研究经验
Cardiology. 2017;138(3):164-168. doi: 10.1159/000475705. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
2
Meta-Analysis of the Relative Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者口服P2Y12抑制剂相对疗效与安全性的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;119(11):1723-1728. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
3
Smoking as a Risk Factor for the Occurrence of Atrial Fibrillation in Men Versus Women: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.吸烟作为男性与女性发生心房颤动的风险因素:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Jan;27(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
4
The Learning Healthcare System and Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.学习型医疗保健系统与心血管保健:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2017 Apr 4;135(14):e826-e857. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000480. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
5
Systematic reviews: causes of non-adherence to P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes and response to intervention.系统评价:急性冠状动脉综合征中不依从P2Y12抑制剂治疗的原因及干预反应
Open Heart. 2016 Oct 19;3(2):e000479. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000479. eCollection 2016.
6
A randomised study for optimising crossover from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The CAPITAL OPTI-CROSS Study.一项关于优化急性冠状动脉综合征患者从替格瑞洛转换为氯吡格雷治疗的随机研究。CAPITAL OPTI-CROSS研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jan 26;117(2):303-310. doi: 10.1160/TH16-04-0340. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
7
Adherence to antiplatelet treatment with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Is there anything we can do to improve it? A systematic review of randomized trials.坚持使用P2Y12受体抑制剂进行抗血小板治疗。我们能做些什么来改善它?一项随机试验的系统评价。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Aug;32(8):1441-51. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1182901. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2016美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠状动脉疾病患者双联抗血小板治疗持续时间的指南聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1082-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.513. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
9
Cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided and dual antiplatelet therapies in acute coronary syndrome.基因型指导与双联抗血小板治疗急性冠脉综合征的成本效果分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4):221-32. doi: 10.7326/M13-1999.
10
Impact of Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care accreditation on quality: an ACTION Registry®-Get With The Guidelines™ analysis.心血管患者护理协会认证对质量的影响:一项ACTION注册研究®-遵循指南™分析
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2013 Sep;12(3):116-20. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31828940e3.