Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, the Medical College, JiNan University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Dermatology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, the Medical College, JiNan University, Guangzhou, China.
Dermatol Ther. 2019 May;32(3):e12822. doi: 10.1111/dth.12822. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of other treatments of actinic keratosis (AK).
A systematic literature review of five databases (including Medline and EMBASE) was first performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A network meta-analysis (NMA) based on a random-effects Bayesian model was then performed on the outcomes for patients with total clearance and lesions reduced from baseline. Five treatments (viz., 0.5% 5-FU with 10% salicylic acid [5-FU/SA], 5% 5-FU cream, 3% diclofenac sodium, cryosurgery, and vehicle) were evaluated.
A total of 11 studies involving 2,256 patients with AK were included in this NMA. The overall risk of bias among the included studies was low. All treatments were significantly better than the vehicle both for patients with total clearance and for lesions reduced from baseline. Among patients with total clearance, 5% 5-FU cream (56.8%) and 5-FU/SA (35.7%) were likely to be more effective than the other treatments, whereas 5% 5-FU cream (98.6%) was likely the most effective in the group of lesions reduced from baseline.
5-FU, diclofenac sodium, and cryosurgery are all useful for AK treatment, with 5-FU being the most effective.
本研究旨在比较 5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)与其他光化性角化病(AK)治疗方法的疗效。
首先对五个数据库(包括 Medline 和 EMBASE)进行系统文献检索,以确定随机对照试验(RCT)。然后,基于随机效应贝叶斯模型对总清除率和基线减少的病变的结局进行网络荟萃分析(NMA)。评估了五种治疗方法(即 0.5% 5-FU 与 10%水杨酸[5-FU/SA]、5% 5-FU 乳膏、3%双氯芬酸钠、冷冻疗法和赋形剂)。
该 NMA 共纳入了 11 项涉及 2256 例 AK 患者的研究。纳入研究的总体偏倚风险较低。所有治疗方法在总清除率和基线减少的病变方面均显著优于赋形剂。在总清除率方面,5% 5-FU 乳膏(56.8%)和 5-FU/SA(35.7%)可能比其他治疗方法更有效,而 5% 5-FU 乳膏(98.6%)在基线减少的病变组中可能是最有效的。
5-FU、双氯芬酸钠和冷冻疗法均对 AK 治疗有效,其中 5-FU 最有效。