Suppr超能文献

三绒毛膜和二绒毛膜三胎妊娠减胎术的临床结局:一项回顾性观察研究。

Clinical outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies: A retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Liu Yaqiong, Shen Yan, Zhang Hong, Tang Yi, Lu Guangxiu, Lin Ge, Gong Fei

机构信息

Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medicine, Central South University, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, China.

Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;58(1):133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To observe the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of trichorionic triplet (TCT) and dichorionic triplet (DCT) pregnancies with or without multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 732 TCT and 118 DCT pregnancies after IVF/ICSI cycles between October 1999 and May 2014 at the Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya. The TCT and DCT groups were subdivided into three subgroups: MFPR to single fetus group, MFPR to twins group and expectant group. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were compared between different subgroups.

RESULTS

The resulting subgroups were TCT-Expectant (n = 40), TCT to twin (n = 610), TCT to single (n = 22), DCT-Expectant (n = 17), DCT to twin (n = 50), and DCT to single (n = 22). The groups with MFPR had the better pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Meanwhile, the significantly higher abortion rates but lower live birth and take home baby rates were found in TCT-Expectant group and DCT-Expectant group (all P < 0.05). Besides, the abortion rate of DCT-Expectant group was much higher than TCT-Expectant group (41% verse 15%, P = 0.032). As for the perinatal outcomes, retaining single fetus group showed the advantage of higher birth weight, and elder gestational age in both DCT and TCT pregnancies (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For DCT and TCT pregnancies, MFPR application could reduce the miscarriage rate, while improving live birth and take home baby rates compared to the expectant groups. Especially, when reduced to a single fetus, MFPR could provide the better perinatal outcomes.

摘要

目的

观察接受或未接受多胎妊娠减胎术(MFPR)的三绒毛膜三胎妊娠(TCT)和二绒毛膜三胎妊娠(DCT)的妊娠及围产期结局。

材料与方法

这是一项对1999年10月至2014年5月在中信湘雅生殖与遗传专科医院进行体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)周期后的732例TCT妊娠和118例DCT妊娠的回顾性研究。TCT组和DCT组又细分为三个亚组:减胎至单胎组、减胎至双胎组和期待治疗组。比较不同亚组之间的妊娠及围产期结局。

结果

最终的亚组为TCT-期待治疗组(n = 40)、TCT减至双胎组(n = 610)、TCT减至单胎组(n = 22)、DCT-期待治疗组(n = 17)、DCT减至双胎组(n = 50)和DCT减至单胎组(n = 22)。接受MFPR的组妊娠及围产期结局更好。同时,TCT-期待治疗组和DCT-期待治疗组的流产率显著更高,但活产率和抱婴回家率更低(均P < 0.05)。此外,DCT-期待治疗组的流产率远高于TCT-期待治疗组(41%对15%,P = 0.032)。至于围产期结局,在DCT和TCT妊娠中,保留单胎组均显示出出生体重更高、孕周更大的优势(均P < 0.05)。

结论

对于DCT和TCT妊娠,应用MFPR可降低流产率,同时与期待治疗组相比提高活产率和抱婴回家率。特别是,当减胎至单胎时,MFPR可提供更好的围产期结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验