• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水果和蔬菜摄入量与疾病负担的关联:系统评价的荟萃分析。

The Associations of Fruit and Vegetable Intakes with Burden of Diseases: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.

出版信息

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Mar;119(3):464-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jand.2018.11.007
PMID:30639206
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low fruit and vegetable intakes are recognized risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. This systematic review summarizes published meta-analyses of global burden of diseases attributable to low fruit and vegetable intakes, and the best relative risk estimates.

METHODS

A published novel assessment process combining Cochrane Review measures, Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews checklist, and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was employed.

RESULTS

Sixty-four reports investigating 98 risk-disease pairs were included in the systematic review. Fifty-six pairs from 39 reports were assessed as statistically significant, involving 29 burden of diseases. Dose responses were identified for 31 negative and two positive associations. High against low intake relative risks were identified for 22 negative and one positive association. The highest identified linear dose response for each 100 g/day increase in fruit intakes was 0.56 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.74) for esophageal cancer, followed by 0.72 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.87) for mouth, pharynx, and larynx cancer; nonlinear dose response for the first 100 g/day of fruit intakes were 0.86 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.88) for stroke, followed by 0.89 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.90) for all-cause mortality. The highest identified linear dose response for each 100 g/day increase in vegetable intakes was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.95) for renal cell cancer, followed by 0.89 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.95) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma; nonlinear dose responses for the first 100 g/day of vegetable intake were 0.86 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.89) for coronary heart disease, followed by 0.87 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.90) for all-cause mortality. For nonlinear associations, clear increases in protective associations were observed with the first 200 g/day of intakes, whereas little further increase or even decrease in protective associations were reported beyond 300 g/day intakes. Canned fruit intakes were positively associated with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality, and pickled vegetable intakes were positively associated with stomach cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review supports existing recommendations for fruit and vegetable intakes. Current comparative risk assessments might significantly underestimate the protective associations of fruit and vegetable intakes.

摘要

背景

低水果和蔬菜摄入量被认为是非传染性疾病的危险因素。本系统评价总结了全球归因于低水果和蔬菜摄入量的疾病负担的已发表荟萃分析,并提供了最佳相对风险估计。

方法

采用了一种新的已发表评估过程,结合 Cochrane 综述措施、系统综述方法学质量评估清单和纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表。

结果

该系统评价共纳入了 64 项研究报告中的 98 个风险疾病对,其中 39 项报告中的 56 对被评估为具有统计学意义,涉及 29 种疾病负担。确定了 31 个负相关和 2 个正相关的剂量反应。确定了 22 个负相关和 1 个正相关的高摄入量与低摄入量的相对风险。每增加 100 克/天水果摄入量,食管癌的最高线性剂量反应为 0.56(95%CI 0.42 至 0.74),随后是口腔、咽和喉癌的 0.72(95%CI 0.59 至 0.87);对于水果摄入量的前 100 克/天,首次非线性剂量反应为 0.86(95%CI 0.84 至 0.88)为中风,随后是全因死亡率的 0.89(95%CI 0.88 至 0.90)。每增加 100 克/天蔬菜摄入量,肾细胞癌的最高线性剂量反应为 0.88(95%CI 0.80 至 0.95),随后是非霍奇金淋巴瘤的 0.89(95%CI 0.84 至 0.95);对于蔬菜摄入量的前 100 克/天,首次非线性剂量反应为冠心病的 0.86(95%CI 0.84 至 0.89),随后是全因死亡率的 0.87(95%CI 0.84 至 0.90)。对于非线性关联,在摄入前 200 克/天内,观察到保护性关联明显增加,而在摄入超过 300 克/天之后,保护性关联几乎没有进一步增加甚至减少。罐装水果摄入量与全因和心血管疾病死亡率呈正相关,腌制蔬菜摄入量与胃癌呈正相关。

结论

本系统评价支持现有的水果和蔬菜摄入量建议。目前的比较风险评估可能严重低估了水果和蔬菜摄入量的保护作用。

相似文献

1
The Associations of Fruit and Vegetable Intakes with Burden of Diseases: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.水果和蔬菜摄入量与疾病负担的关联:系统评价的荟萃分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Mar;119(3):464-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
2
Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.水果和蔬菜摄入量与心血管疾病、总癌症和全因死亡率的风险:前瞻性研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):1029-1056. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw319.
3
Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.水果、蔬菜与肺癌风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jan;27(1):81-96. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv381. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
4
Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of depression: accumulative evidence from an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.水果和蔬菜摄入与抑郁风险:来自更新的系统评价和荟萃分析的累积证据。
Br J Nutr. 2018 May;119(10):1087-1101. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518000697.
5
A summary of meat intakes and health burdens.肉类摄入量与健康负担概述。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jan;72(1):18-29. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.117. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Coronary heart disease and stroke disease burden attributable to fruit and vegetable intake in Japan: projected DALYS to 2060.日本因水果和蔬菜摄入量导致的冠心病和脑卒中疾病负担:到 2060 年预计的 DALYs。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):707. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7047-z.
7
[Fruit and vegetable consumption: what benefits, what risks?].[食用水果和蔬菜:有哪些益处,有哪些风险?]
Rev Prat. 2019 Feb;69(2):139-142.
8
The associations of soya intakes with non-communicable diseases: a scoping review of meta-analyses.大豆摄入量与非传染性疾病的关系:荟萃分析的范围综述。
Br J Nutr. 2023 Jan 14;129(1):135-146. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522000691. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
9
Associations of whole-grain, refined-grain, and fruit and vegetable consumption with risks of all-cause mortality and incident coronary artery disease and ischemic stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.全谷物、精制谷物以及水果和蔬菜摄入量与全因死亡率、冠心病和缺血性中风发病风险的关联:社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究
Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Sep;78(3):383-90. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.383.
10
Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Mortality: Results From 2 Prospective Cohort Studies of US Men and Women and a Meta-Analysis of 26 Cohort Studies.水果和蔬菜摄入量与死亡率:来自 2 项美国男女前瞻性队列研究的结果和 26 项队列研究的荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2021 Apr 27;143(17):1642-1654. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048996. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of genetics and the environment on cancer risk in Indigenous Australians: a narrative review.遗传学与环境对澳大利亚原住民癌症风险的影响:一篇叙述性综述。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Jun 29;61:101627. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101627. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Embodying disadvantage: a theoretically-informed analysis of pathways linking socioeconomic position with all-cause and cancer mortality in a nationally representative cohort of adults in Canada.体现劣势:对加拿大全国代表性成年人群体中社会经济地位与全因死亡率和癌症死亡率之间联系途径的理论分析。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 23;25(1):2533. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23728-7.
3
Foreword to a Scoping Review of Interventions on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries: A Global Perspective.
低收入、中等收入和高收入国家水果和蔬菜摄入量干预措施范围综述前言:全球视角
Food Nutr Bull. 2025 Sep;46(1_suppl):S3-S4. doi: 10.1177/03795721251322825. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
4
Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Consumption of Different Food Groups and Risk of All-cause Mortality.关于不同食物组的消费与全因死亡率风险的系统评价和荟萃分析的伞状综述
Adv Nutr. 2025 Apr;16(4):100393. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100393. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
5
Production risk and technical efficiency of dry-season vegetable farmers in the Upper East Region of Ghana.加纳上东部地区旱季蔬菜种植农户的生产风险与技术效率
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0309375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309375. eCollection 2025.
6
Vegetable consumption and promotion among school-age children and adolescents in West Africa: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.西非学龄儿童和青少年的蔬菜消费与推广:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Br J Nutr. 2025 Jan 10;133(3):1-14. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524003301.
7
Boosting Health Benefits in Vegetables: A Novel Ultraviolet B (UVB) Device for Rapid At-Home Enhancement of Phytochemicals and Bioactivity.增强蔬菜的健康益处:一种用于在家中快速增强植物化学物质和生物活性的新型紫外线B(UVB)设备。
Foods. 2024 Oct 18;13(20):3311. doi: 10.3390/foods13203311.
8
Cross-sectional associations between fruit and vegetable intake and successful ageing across six countries: findings from the WHO Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE).横断面研究显示,六个国家的水果和蔬菜摄入量与成功老龄化之间存在关联:来自世卫组织全球老龄化和成人健康研究(SAGE)的结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Oct 21;27(1):e244. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001976.
9
Effect of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption on Human Health: An Update of the Literature.水果和蔬菜消费对人体健康的影响:文献综述更新
Foods. 2024 Oct 2;13(19):3149. doi: 10.3390/foods13193149.
10
Characteristics associated with fruit and vegetable consumption in mid aged and older Chinese men and women: a cross-sectional analysis of the first wave of WHO SAGE China.中国中老年男性和女性的水果和蔬菜消费特征:对世卫组织 SAGE 中国第一波调查的横断面分析。
Br J Nutr. 2024 Sep 28;132(6):805-814. doi: 10.1017/S000711452400151X. Epub 2024 Oct 15.