• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加纳上东部地区旱季蔬菜种植农户的生产风险与技术效率

Production risk and technical efficiency of dry-season vegetable farmers in the Upper East Region of Ghana.

作者信息

Akolgo James Anaba, Osei-Asare Y B, Sarpong D B, Asem Freda E, Quaye Wilhemina

机构信息

Department of Ecological Agriculture, School of Agriculture, Bolgatanga Technical University, Bolgtanaga, Ghana.

Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0309375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309375. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0309375
PMID:39946341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11824998/
Abstract

The Ghanaian population is aware of the increasing health challenges in our health facilities and the need to consume more vegetables to improve their health status. This, coupled with population growth and changing consumer patterns has led to an increasing demand for vegetable products in Ghana. Smallholder farmers in the country have thus intensified the production of vegetables during the dry season to meet consumers' demand and to generate income. However, their outputs have been lower than the country's potential, so the research was conducted to identify the causes and determinants of the low yields. A total of 322 dry-season vegetable farmers in seven (7) districts in twenty-four (24) communities were selected from the Upper East Region of Ghana using a purposive random sampling technique. The Kumbhakar model was employed to compute the production risk, technical inefficiency and determinants of vegetable production in the region. The study reveals that the input variables: labour, seed, fertilizer, agrochemical and irrigation costs positively are related to the output value of vegetables with an increasing return to scale. In addition, labour, seed and agrochemical costs show a significant production risk-decreasing effect while the risk of vegetable production is reduced with fertilizer and irrigation costs. The study further depicts that extension visits, experience, water pumps and gravity-fed irrigation systems positively affect the technical efficiency of dry-season vegetable production. Again, given the current state of technology and resources available to the farmers, enhancing the vegetable outputs could be achieved by reducing the technical inefficiencies by 27% while considering the effects of production risk. The study concludes that the farmers can improve the output of the vegetable farms for higher income by adopting the best vegetable production practices such as efficient water-saving irrigation technologies and fertilizer usage while adopting the knowledge from the extension training to improve their technical efficiency.

摘要

加纳民众意识到本国医疗机构面临的健康挑战日益严峻,也意识到需要多吃蔬菜来改善健康状况。这一点,再加上人口增长和消费者模式的变化,导致加纳对蔬菜产品的需求不断增加。该国的小农户因此加大了旱季蔬菜的产量,以满足消费者需求并增加收入。然而,他们的产量低于该国的潜力,因此开展了这项研究,以确定产量低下的原因和决定因素。采用目的随机抽样技术,从加纳上东部地区的24个社区所在的7个区中,共挑选了322名旱季蔬菜种植农户。采用昆巴卡尔模型来计算该地区蔬菜生产的风险、技术效率低下问题以及决定因素。研究表明,投入变量:劳动力、种子、化肥、农用化学品和灌溉成本与蔬菜产值呈正相关,且规模报酬递增。此外,劳动力、种子和农用化学品成本显示出显著的降低生产风险的效果,而化肥和灌溉成本则降低了蔬菜生产风险。研究进一步表明,推广访问、经验、水泵和重力灌溉系统对旱季蔬菜生产的技术效率有积极影响。同样,考虑到农民目前可获得的技术和资源状况,在考虑生产风险影响的同时,将技术效率低下问题降低27%,就可以提高蔬菜产量。研究得出结论,农民可以通过采用最佳蔬菜生产做法,如高效节水灌溉技术和化肥使用方法,并借鉴推广培训中的知识来提高技术效率,从而提高蔬菜农场的产量,获得更高收入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc6/11824998/1bb14df374f9/pone.0309375.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc6/11824998/1bb14df374f9/pone.0309375.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc6/11824998/1bb14df374f9/pone.0309375.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Production risk and technical efficiency of dry-season vegetable farmers in the Upper East Region of Ghana.加纳上东部地区旱季蔬菜种植农户的生产风险与技术效率
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0309375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309375. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the impact of improved maize varieties on agricultural productivity and technical efficiency among smallholder farmers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: an empirical analysis.评估改良玉米品种对南非东开普省小农户农业生产力和技术效率的影响:一项实证分析。
GM Crops Food. 2025 Dec;16(1):272-304. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2025.2476667. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
3
Contribution of Wastewater Irrigation to Soil Transmitted Helminths Infection among Vegetable Farmers in Kumasi, Ghana.加纳库马西蔬菜种植农民中废水灌溉对土壤传播蠕虫感染的影响
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Dec 6;10(12):e0005161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005161. eCollection 2016 Dec.
4
The effect of producer groups on the productivity and technical efficiency of smallholder cocoa farmers in Ghana.生产者组织对加纳小农可可种植者生产力和技术效率的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 11;18(12):e0294716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294716. eCollection 2023.
5
Does the Adoption of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices Impact Farmers' Income? Evidence from Ghana.采用气候智能型农业实践是否会影响农民收入?来自加纳的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073804.
6
Technical inefficiency of Dutch vegetable farms: Specific-input analyses.荷兰蔬菜农场的技术无效率:特定投入分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 23;16(4):e0250494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250494. eCollection 2021.
7
Environmental efficiency analysis of China's vegetable production.中国蔬菜生产的环境效率分析
Biomed Environ Sci. 2005 Feb;18(1):21-30.
8
Assessing the environmental impacts of organic and conventional mixed vegetable production based on the life cycle assessment approach.基于生命周期评价方法评估有机和常规混合蔬菜生产的环境影响。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2022 Nov;18(6):1733-1746. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4609. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
The environmental and socioeconomic benefits of optimized fertilization for greenhouse vegetables.温室蔬菜优化施肥的环境与社会经济效益
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 15;908:168252. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168252. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
10
Arsenic Elevated Groundwater Irrigation: Farmers' Perception of Rice and Vegetable Contamination in a Naturally Arsenic Endemic Area.砷污染地下水灌溉:自然砷污染地区农民对稻米和蔬菜污染的认知。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 12;20(6):4989. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064989.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental changes impact on vegetables physiology and nutrition - Gaps between vegetable and cereal crops.环境变化对蔬菜生理和营养的影响 - 蔬菜与谷物作物之间的差距。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jul 10;933:173180. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173180. Epub 2024 May 11.
2
Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Non-Communicable Diseases among Adults Aged ≥50 Years in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.水果和蔬菜摄入量与 50 岁及以上中低收入国家成年人的非传染性疾病。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26(11):1003-1009. doi: 10.1007/s12603-022-1855-z.
3
Productivity, nutrient use efficiency, energetic, and economics of winter maize in south India.
印度南部冬玉米的生产力、养分利用效率、能量学和经济学。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0266886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266886. eCollection 2022.
4
Effect of a pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program on child dietary patterns, food security, and weight status: a study protocol.儿科蔬果处方项目对儿童饮食模式、食物保障和体重状况的影响:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12544-y.
5
In pursuit of a better world: crop improvement and the CGIAR.追求更美好的世界:作物改良与 CGIAR。
J Exp Bot. 2021 Jul 10;72(14):5158-5179. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab226.
6
The Big Three Health Behaviors and Mental Health and Well-Being Among Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Investigation of Sleep, Exercise, and Diet.年轻人的三大健康行为与心理健康及幸福感:睡眠、运动和饮食的横断面调查
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 10;11:579205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579205. eCollection 2020.
7
Global Vegetable Intake and Supply Compared to Recommendations: A Systematic Review.全球蔬菜摄入量与供应量与推荐量相比:系统评价。
Nutrients. 2020 May 27;12(6):1558. doi: 10.3390/nu12061558.
8
Gaps between fruit and vegetable production, demand, and recommended consumption at global and national levels: an integrated modelling study.全球和国家层面水果和蔬菜生产、需求和推荐摄入量之间的差距:综合建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Jul;3(7):e318-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30095-6.
9
Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.195 个国家 1990 年至 2017 年饮食风险对健康的影响:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
The Associations of Fruit and Vegetable Intakes with Burden of Diseases: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.水果和蔬菜摄入量与疾病负担的关联:系统评价的荟萃分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Mar;119(3):464-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jan 11.