• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FAST DASH:初步技术评估的项目概述和主要发现。

FAST DASH: Program overview and key findings from initial technology evaluations.

机构信息

Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (VTTI), 3500 Transportation Research Plaza, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States.

Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (VTTI), 3500 Transportation Research Plaza, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Mar;124:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.014. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.014
PMID:30639683
Abstract

One focus of the U.S. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is to provide leadership in the testing and evaluation of promising safety technologies developed for use in commercial motor vehicles (CMVs). To this end, a program was developed by FMCSA to conduct independent, short-turnaround evaluations of promising safety technologies. Vendors who had promising safety technologies, focused in the commercial vehicle domain, were solicited to participate and submit an application. One technology was selected by FMCSA for each evaluation cycle (lasting approximately 18 months). The technology was tested in both static and dynamic conditions, after which a trucking fleet, and its drivers, were brought in to test the technology in a field operational test (FOT) lasting approximately 6 weeks. During the FOT, 15-20 trucks were instrumented with the technology and other data collection equipment, including sensors and video cameras. A study was then conducted during which drivers used the technology in their revenue-producing operations. Initially, often for the first 2 months, the technology collected data but did but not actively present alerts to the driver. Following this baseline period, a four-month intervention period was conducted. Each evaluation has resulted in more than 1,000,000 km of driving data including continuous video data. Data analyses focused on understanding the efficacy of the technology in terms of (i) safety improvements, (ii) challenges to implementation (e.g., unintended consequences), and (iii) user acceptance (including driver, fleet manager, and other fleet personnel as appropriate). The technology vendors who applied for the first three evaluations can be classified into the following general categories: fatigue/drowsiness, fleet management, visibility safety systems, cell phone policy/enforcement, and other systems. Three technology evaluations were completed in the first 5 years of (i) a blind spot detection and warning system, (ii) an onboard monitoring system, and (iii) a novel mirror technology. High-level results of each of these three evaluations are highlighted in the paper.

摘要

美国联邦汽车运输安全管理局(FMCSA)的一个重点是为商业机动车(CMV)使用的有前途的安全技术的测试和评估提供领导。为此,FMCSA 制定了一个计划,以对有前途的安全技术进行独立、快速的评估。有前途的安全技术的供应商,专注于商用车领域,被邀请参与并提交申请。FMCSA 为每个评估周期(持续约 18 个月)选择一项技术。该技术在静态和动态条件下进行了测试,之后,一个卡车车队及其驾驶员被引入进行大约为期 6 周的现场操作测试(FOT)。在 FOT 期间,15-20 辆卡车配备了该技术和其他数据采集设备,包括传感器和摄像机。然后进行了一项研究,在此期间,驾驶员在其创收运营中使用了该技术。最初,通常在前 2 个月,该技术收集数据,但不会主动向驾驶员发出警报。在此基线期之后,进行了为期四个月的干预期。每次评估都产生了超过 100 万公里的驾驶数据,包括连续视频数据。数据分析侧重于从以下几个方面了解技术的功效:(i) 安全改进,(ii) 实施挑战(例如,意外后果),以及 (iii) 用户接受度(包括驾驶员、车队经理和其他车队人员)。在前三次评估中申请的技术供应商可以分为以下几类:疲劳/瞌睡、车队管理、可视性安全系统、手机政策/执行以及其他系统。在(i)盲点检测和警告系统、(ii)车载监控系统和(iii)新型后视镜技术的前 5 年中完成了三次技术评估。本文重点介绍了这三次评估的高级结果。

相似文献

1
FAST DASH: Program overview and key findings from initial technology evaluations.FAST DASH:初步技术评估的项目概述和主要发现。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Mar;124:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.014. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
2
Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.重型卡车驾驶员在综合车载碰撞预警系统干预下的跟车行为:现场评估。
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):687-97. doi: 10.1177/0018720812439412.
3
A trial of retrofitted advisory collision avoidance technology in government fleet vehicles.政府车队中改装后的防撞预警技术试验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Evaluation of a high visibility enforcement project focused on passenger vehicles interacting with commercial vehicles.一项针对乘用车与商用车交互情况的高可见度执法项目评估。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(5):459-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
5
An observational study of the safety benefits of electronic logging devices using carrier-collected data.一项利用承运人收集的数据对电子记录设备的安全效益进行的观察性研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Apr 3;18(3):312-317. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1201201. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
6
Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.2011 年款道奇和吉普车主在使用防撞和相关技术方面的体验。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:298-303. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.936408.
7
The relative importance of real-time in-cab and external feedback in managing fatigue in real-world commercial transport operations.在实际商业运输运营中,实时驾驶室内部反馈和外部反馈对管理疲劳的相对重要性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 May 29;18(sup1):S71-S78. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1306855. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
8
Initial development of a practical safety audit tool to assess fleet safety management practices.实用安全审核工具的初步开发,以评估车队安全管理实践。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Jul;47:102-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.021. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
9
Do the benefits outweigh the costs? Societal benefit-cost analysis of three large truck safety technologies.这些收益是否超过成本?三种大型卡车安全技术的社会效益成本分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
10
Is a flick-through enough? A content analysis of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) user manuals.仅仅快速浏览一下就足够了吗?对高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)用户手册的内容分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0252688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252688. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Video feedback intervention for cognitively impaired older drivers: A randomized clinical trial.针对认知障碍老年驾驶员的视频反馈干预:一项随机临床试验。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 Mar 3;7(1):e12140. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12140. eCollection 2021.