Suppr超能文献

在撒哈拉以南旱地气候智能型保护性农业下土壤有机碳的大量积累。

Significant build-up of soil organic carbon under climate-smart conservation farming in Sub-Saharan Acrisols.

机构信息

Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway.

Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.452. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

Abstract

Conservation farming (CF) involving minimum tillage, mulching and crop rotation may offer climate change adaptation and mitigation benefits. However, reported effects of CF, as applied by smallholders, on storage of soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa differ considerably between studies. This is partly due to differences in management practice, soil type and adoption level between individual farmers. Where CF involves planting basins, year-to-year changes in position of basins make SOC stock estimates more uncertain. Here we assess the difference in SOC build-up and soil quality between inside planting basins (receiving inputs of lime and fertilizer; basins opened each year) and outside planting basins (no soil disturbance or inputs other than residues) under hand-hoe tilled CF in an Acrisol at Mkushi, Zambia. Seven years of strict CF husbandry significantly improved soil quality inside planting basins as compared with outside basins. Significant effects were found for SOC concentration (0.74 ± 0.06% vs. 0.57 ± 0.08%), SOC stock (20.1 ± 2.0 vs. 16.4 ± 2.6 t ha, 0-20 cm), soil pH (6.3 ± 0.2 vs. 4.95± 0.4) and cation exchange capacity (3.8 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.4 cmol kg). As planting basins only occupy 9.3% of the field, the absolute rate of increase in SOC, compared with outside basins, was 0.05 t C ha yr This corresponds to an overall relative increase of 2.95‰ SOC yr in the upper 20 cm of the soil. Also, hot water extractable carbon (HWEC), a proxy for labile organic matter, and potential nitrification rates were consistently greater inside than outside basins. The significant increase in quantity and quality of SOC may be due to increased inputs of roots, due to favorable conditions for plant growth through input of fertilizer and lime, along with increased rainwater infiltration in the basins.

摘要

保护性耕作(CF)包括最小耕作、覆盖和轮作,可能提供气候变化适应和缓解的好处。然而,小规模经营者实施的 CF 对撒哈拉以南非洲土壤有机碳(SOC)和土壤肥力的储存的影响,在不同的研究中差异很大。这部分是由于个别农民的管理实践、土壤类型和采用水平的差异造成的。在涉及种植盆地的 CF 中,盆地位置的年际变化使 SOC 存量估算更加不确定。在这里,我们评估了赞比亚 Mkushi 的 Acrisol 中,手锄 CF 下种植盆地内部(接收石灰和肥料投入;每年开垦盆地)和种植盆地外部(除残留物外无土壤干扰或投入)之间 SOC 积累和土壤质量的差异。七年严格的 CF 管理显著提高了种植盆地内部的土壤质量,与种植盆地外部相比。发现 SOC 浓度(0.74 ± 0.06%比 0.57 ± 0.08%)、SOC 储量(20.1 ± 2.0 比 16.4 ± 2.6 t ha,0-20 cm)、土壤 pH 值(6.3 ± 0.2 比 4.95 ± 0.4)和阳离子交换量(3.8 ± 0.7 比 1.6 ± 0.4 cmol kg)有显著影响。由于种植盆地仅占田地的 9.3%,与种植盆地外部相比,SOC 的绝对增长率为 0.05 t C ha yr,这相当于土壤上层 20 cm 内 SOC 的总体相对增加 2.95‰ yr。此外,热水可提取碳(HWEC),一种不稳定有机质的替代物,以及潜在的硝化速率,内部始终大于外部。SOC 数量和质量的显著增加可能是由于肥料和石灰的投入增加了根系的输入,再加上盆地中增加了雨水渗透,从而为植物生长创造了有利条件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验