• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

统计方法与多准则决策在伊朗北部洪水灾害易发性制图中的比较。

A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran.

机构信息

Department of Geomorphology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 36581-17994, Iran.

Faculty of Earth Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran 14911-15719, Iran.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:443-458. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021
PMID:30640112
Abstract

In north of Iran, flood is one of the most important natural hazards that annually inflict great economic damages on humankind infrastructures and natural ecosystems. The Kiasar watershed is known as one of the critical areas in north of Iran, due to numerous floods and waste of water and soil resources, as well as related economic and ecological losses. However, a comprehensive and systematic research to identify flood-prone areas, which may help to establish management and conservation measures, has not been carried out yet. Therefore, this study tested four methods: evidential belief function (EBF), frequency ratio (FR), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity To ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Vlse Kriterijumsk Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) for flood hazard susceptibility mapping (FHSM) in this area. These were combined in two methodological frameworks involving statistical and multi-criteria decision making approaches. The efficiency of statistical and multi-criteria methods in FHSM were compared by using area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, seed cell area index and frequency ratio. A database containing flood inventory maps and flood-related conditioning factors was established for this watershed. The flood inventory maps produced included 132 flood conditions, which were randomly classified into two groups, for training (70%) and validation (30%). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) indicated that slope, distance to stream and land use/land cover are of key importance in flood occurrence in the study catchment. In validation results, the EBF model had a better prediction rate (0.987) and success rate (0.946) than FR, TOPSIS and VIKOR (prediction rate 0.917, 0.888, and 0.810; success rate 0.939, 0.904, and 0.735, respectively). Based on their frequency ratio and seed cell area index values, all models except VIKOR showed acceptable accuracy of classification.

摘要

在伊朗北部,洪水是最重要的自然灾害之一,每年都会给人类基础设施和自然生态系统造成巨大的经济损失。基萨水库流域是伊朗北部的一个重要地区,由于经常发生洪水以及水资源和土壤资源的浪费,以及相关的经济和生态损失,这里已经成为一个多灾多难的地区。然而,目前还没有进行全面系统的研究来确定易发生洪水的地区,而这些地区可能有助于建立管理和保护措施。因此,本研究在该地区测试了四种方法:证据权(EBF)、频率比(FR)、逼近理想解的排序技术(TOPSIS)和 VIKOR 用于洪水灾害易发性制图(FHSM)。这些方法结合了统计学和多准则决策方法两种方法框架。通过使用接收者操作特征(AUROC)曲线、种子单元格面积指数和频率比来比较统计和多准则方法在 FHSM 中的效率。为该流域建立了一个包含洪水清单图和与洪水有关的条件因素的数据库。生成的洪水清单图包括 132 种洪水情况,这些情况被随机分为两组,用于训练(70%)和验证(30%)。层次分析法(AHP)表明,坡度、距溪流的距离和土地利用/土地覆被是该研究流域洪水发生的关键因素。在验证结果中,EBF 模型的预测率(0.987)和成功率(0.946)均高于 FR、TOPSIS 和 VIKOR(预测率分别为 0.917、0.888 和 0.810;成功率分别为 0.939、0.904 和 0.735)。根据它们的频率比和种子单元格面积指数值,除 VIKOR 外,所有模型的分类精度都达到了可接受的水平。

相似文献

1
A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran.统计方法与多准则决策在伊朗北部洪水灾害易发性制图中的比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:443-458. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
2
Prioritization of water erosion-prone sub-watersheds using three ensemble methods in Qareaghaj catchment, southern Iran.利用三种集成方法对伊朗南部卡雷阿加赫集水区易受水蚀的子流域进行优先级划分
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jul;28(28):37894-37917. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13300-2. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannons entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models.伊朗不同双变量模型的暴洪易发性分析及其制图:香农熵、统计指数和加权因子模型的比较
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Dec;188(12):656. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5665-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
4
Mapping flood susceptibility with PROMETHEE multi-criteria analysis method.运用 PROMETHEE 多准则分析方法进行洪水易发性图绘制。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jun;31(28):41267-41289. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33895-6. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
5
Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: A comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multi-criteria decision making models.利用形态计量参数分析对亚流域进行侵蚀性优先级排序及其制图:TOPSIS、VIKOR、SAW 和 CF 多准则决策模型的比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 1;613-614:1385-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.210. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
6
AHP and TOPSIS based flood risk assessment- a case study of the Navsari City, Gujarat, India.基于层次分析法和逼近理想解排序法的洪水风险评估——以印度古吉拉特邦那萨里市为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Jun 17;194(7):509. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10111-x.
7
A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modelling of GIS-based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS techniques in the Sub-Himalayan foothills region of Eastern India.基于 GIS 的 TOPSIS、VIKOR 和 EDAS 技术在印度东部次喜马拉雅山麓地区洪水易感性建模的比较评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):16036-16067. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23168-5. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
8
GIS-based groundwater potential mapping in Shahroud plain, Iran. A comparison among statistical (bivariate and multivariate), data mining and MCDM approaches.基于 GIS 的伊朗沙赫鲁德平原地下水潜力制图。统计(二元和多元)、数据挖掘和 MCDM 方法的比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 25;658:160-177. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.115. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Catchment-scale soil conservation: Using climate, vegetation, and topo-hydrological parameters to support decision making and implementation.集水区尺度的土壤保持:利用气候、植被和地形水文参数来支持决策制定和实施。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 10;712:136124. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136124. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
10
Flood susceptibility mapping by best-worst and logistic regression methods in Mersin, Turkey.土耳其梅尔辛地区基于最佳-最差法和逻辑回归法的洪水易发性制图
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):45151-45170. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25423-9. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Management and prediction of river flood utilizing optimization approach of artificial intelligence evolutionary algorithms.利用人工智能进化算法的优化方法进行河流洪水管理与预测。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22787. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04290-z.
2
Comparative evaluation of multi-influence factor, Shannon Entropy, and frequency ratio techniques for groundwater potential mapping in the Maze and Zenti catchments, Omo Basin, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚奥莫河流域梅兹和曾蒂集水区地下水潜力制图中多影响因素、香农熵和频率比技术的比较评估
Heliyon. 2025 Feb 5;11(4):e42473. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42473. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.
3
Building Vulnerability to Landslides: Broad-Scale Assessment in Xinxing County, China.
构建山体滑坡脆弱性:中国新兴县的大规模评估
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 5;24(13):4366. doi: 10.3390/s24134366.
4
Land capability assessment of Sali watershed for agricultural suitability using a multi-criteria-based decision-making approach.采用基于多准则决策的方法对 Sali 流域的土地进行农业适宜性评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Feb 5;196(3):237. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12393-9.
5
GIS-based data-driven bivariate statistical models for landslide susceptibility prediction in Upper Tista Basin, India.基于地理信息系统(GIS)的数据驱动双变量统计模型在印度上提斯塔河流域滑坡易发性预测中的应用
Heliyon. 2023 May 12;9(5):e16186. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16186. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Multi-Source Data Fusion and Hydrodynamics for Urban Waterlogging Risk Identification.多源数据融合与水动力在城市内涝风险识别中的应用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032528.
7
Spatial-Temporal Sensitivity Analysis of Flood Control Capability in China Based on MADM-GIS Model.基于多属性决策-地理信息系统模型的中国防洪能力时空敏感性分析
Entropy (Basel). 2022 May 30;24(6):772. doi: 10.3390/e24060772.
8
Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models.高原盆地区克桑巴蒂土壤侵蚀敏感性评估的子流域优先级划分:MCDM 和 SWAT 模型的比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 10;734:139474. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139474. Epub 2020 May 16.
9
Evaluation of Recent Advanced Soft Computing Techniques for Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparative Study.评价近期先进的软计算技术在沟蚀易发性制图中的应用:一项比较研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 7;20(2):335. doi: 10.3390/s20020335.