• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全膝关节置换术后局部浸润镇痛与鞘内吗啡镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验。

A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia vs. intrathecal morphine after total knee replacement: A randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Cork University Hospital and University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (DM, JM, JG, FL, GS, GI).

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Apr;36(4):264-271. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000943.

DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000943
PMID:30640244
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is an effective pain management technique following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if LIA provides better analgesia for patients undergoing unilateral TKA than intrathecal morphine.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Single tertiary referral centre.

PATIENTS

Consecutive American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I to III patients scheduled to undergo unilateral TKA were randomised to two groups.

INTERVENTION

The control group received spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine and preservative-free morphine 0.3 mg. The intervention group received opioid-free spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine, followed by intra-operative infiltration of the knee with levobupivacaine 2 mg kg and adrenaline 0.5 mg diluted to a volume of 100 ml with 0.9% saline. An intra-articular catheter was placed during surgery and used to give a bolus of 15 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5% on the morning of the first postoperative day.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain were assessed repeatedly for 48 h postoperatively, at rest and on passive knee flexion to 30°. The primary outcome was VAS scores for pain at rest and on movement at 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were VAS scores at rest and on movement at 2, 6, 12 and 48 postoperative hours, opioid consumption, degree of active flexion of operative knee achieved in the first 48 h and the incidence of opioid-related side effects.

RESULTS

Forty three patients completed the study. Mean (± SD) VAS scores for pain at 24 h were lower in the intervention group than the control group at rest; 16.43 (± 20.3) vs. 37.2 (± 33.6), (P = 0.029). VAS scores for pain at 24 h on movement were also lower in the intervention group vs. the control group; 39.1 (± 22.8) vs. 57.0 (± 30.9), (P = 0.037). VAS scores were also lower on movement; 25.9 (± 16.8) vs. 40.5 (± 24.0), (P = 0.028) at 48 h.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that LIA conferred superior analgesia compared with intrathecal morphine 0.3 mg at 24 and 48 h following TKA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01312415.

摘要

背景

局部浸润镇痛(LIA)是全膝关节置换术后(TKA)一种有效的疼痛管理技术。

目的

研究 LIA 是否比鞘内吗啡更能为接受单侧 TKA 的患者提供更好的镇痛效果。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

单一的三级转诊中心。

患者

连续接受美国麻醉师协会身体状况 I 至 III 级的单侧 TKA 患者,随机分为两组。

干预

对照组接受鞘内布比卡因和无防腐剂吗啡 0.3mg 的脊髓麻醉。干预组接受无阿片类药物的脊髓麻醉,然后在术中用左旋布比卡因 2mg/kg 和肾上腺素 0.5mg 对膝关节进行浸润,用 0.9%生理盐水稀释至 100ml。术中放置关节内导管,在术后第一天早晨给予 15ml 左旋布比卡因 0.5%的推注。

主要观察指标

术后 48 小时内反复评估视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分,在休息时和被动膝关节屈曲至 30°时评估。主要结局指标为术后 24 小时的 VAS 静息疼痛评分和运动时的 VAS 疼痛评分。次要结局指标为术后 2、6、12 和 48 小时的 VAS 静息和运动评分、阿片类药物用量、术后 48 小时内手术侧膝关节主动屈曲的程度以及阿片类药物相关副作用的发生率。

结果

43 例患者完成了研究。与对照组相比,干预组在休息时的 24 小时 VAS 疼痛评分更低,分别为 16.43(±20.3)和 37.2(±33.6),(P=0.029)。在运动时,干预组的 VAS 疼痛评分也低于对照组,分别为 39.1(±22.8)和 57.0(±30.9),(P=0.037)。在运动时,干预组的 VAS 疼痛评分也较低,分别为 25.9(±16.8)和 40.5(±24.0),(P=0.028),在 48 小时。

结论

我们的结论是,与鞘内注射 0.3mg 吗啡相比,LIA 在 TKA 后 24 和 48 小时提供了更好的镇痛效果。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01312415。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia vs. intrathecal morphine after total knee replacement: A randomised controlled trial.全膝关节置换术后局部浸润镇痛与鞘内吗啡镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Apr;36(4):264-271. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000943.
2
Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.局部浸润镇痛与鞘内吗啡用于全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理的随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):926-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182288deb. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
3
Is changing the postoperative pain management in total knee arthroplasty from femoral nerve block to local infiltration analgesia successful? Retrospective trial with the first and last 100 patients.将全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理从股神经阻滞改为局部浸润镇痛是否成功?对前后各100例患者进行的回顾性试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 19;15(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01981-3.
4
Relative Contributions of Adductor Canal Block and Intrathecal Morphine to Analgesia and Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.股神经阻滞联合鞘内吗啡对全膝关节置换术后镇痛和功能恢复的相对作用:一项随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):154-160. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000724.
5
Local infiltration analgesia combined with a standardized multimodal approach including an adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial.局部浸润镇痛联合标准化多模式方法(包括股内侧肌管阻滞)用于全膝关节置换术:一项前瞻性随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验
J Anesth. 2018 Jun;32(3):326-332. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2476-x. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
Comparison of patient outcomes in periarticular and intraarticular local anaesthetic infiltration techniques in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中关节周围和关节内局部麻醉浸润技术的患者结局比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jul 31;10:119. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0249-x.
7
Comparing adductor canal block with local infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, blinded and randomized clinical trial.股神经阻滞与局部浸润镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的比较:一项前瞻性、盲法、随机临床试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2018 May;46:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
8
No Difference in Early Analgesia Between Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection and Intrathecal Morphine After TKA.全膝关节置换术后脂质体布比卡因注射与鞘内注射吗啡在早期镇痛方面无差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):94-105. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4931-z.
9
Comparison of continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB/SA) and continuous femoral nerve block with mini-dose spinal morphine (CFNB/SAMO) for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a randomized controlled study.全膝关节置换术(TKA)后连续股神经阻滞(CFNB/SA)与小剂量脊髓吗啡连续股神经阻滞(CFNB/SAMO)用于术后镇痛的比较:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Jul 16;16(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0205-2.
10
Multimodal infiltration of local anaesthetic in total knee arthroplasty; is posterior capsular infiltration worth the risk? a prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.全膝关节置换术中局部麻醉药的多模式浸润;后关节囊浸润值得冒这个风险吗?一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Apr;99-B(4):483-488. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-0877.R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrathecal Morphine Versus Other Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in the Context of Multimodal Analgesia: A Meta-Analysis.多模式镇痛背景下鞘内注射吗啡与其他术后疼痛管理技术的比较:一项荟萃分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;18(4):512. doi: 10.3390/ph18040512.
2
The use of intrathecal morphine in non-abdominal surgery: a scoping review.鞘内注射吗啡在非腹部手术中的应用:一项范围综述
BJA Open. 2025 Mar 20;14:100387. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100387. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Comparative efficacy of intrathecal morphine and adductor canal block in the knee arthroplasty population: a retrospective multi-centre cohort study.
鞘内吗啡与收肌管阻滞在膝关节置换人群中的疗效比较:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02740-1.
4
Cocktail of Ropivacaine, Morphine, and Diprospan Reduces Pain and Prolongs Analgesic Effects after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.罗哌卡因、吗啡和得宝松鸡尾酒疗法可减轻全膝关节置换术后疼痛并延长镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pract. 2024 Feb 28;2024:3697846. doi: 10.1155/2024/3697846. eCollection 2024.
5
Periarticular injection, iPACK block, and peripheral nerve block in pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a structured narrative review.全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理中的关节周围注射、iPACK阻滞和周围神经阻滞:一项结构化叙述性综述
Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Nov 15;12(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00346-8.
6
A guide to regional analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术区域镇痛指南
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Dec 10;6(12):1181-1192. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210045.
7
Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia with morphine and betamethasone show superior analgesic effect than local infiltration analgesia alone for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.收肌管阻滞联合吗啡和倍他米松局部浸润镇痛对全膝关节置换术的镇痛效果优于单纯局部浸润镇痛:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 19;23(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05388-5.
8
Comparison of intrathecal morphine versus local infiltration analgesia for pain control in total knee and hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.鞘内注射吗啡与局部浸润镇痛用于全膝关节和髋关节置换术疼痛控制的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 4;99(36):e21971. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021971.
9
Intrathecal versus local infiltration analgesia for pain control in total joint arthroplasty.鞘内与局部浸润镇痛在全关节置换术中的疼痛控制。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Mar 18;15(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01627-4.
10
Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):755-761. doi: 10.1111/os.12535.