Department of Psychology.
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Jul;66(4):461-472. doi: 10.1037/cou0000332. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
Web-based stress management interventions are effective for college students, particularly those with interpersonal trauma histories. However, these interventions have not been assessed among those reporting childhood emotional abuse, a group with the most distress. Ecological momentary interventions (EMIs), which use mobile phones to deliver near-real-time psychosocial interventions in daily life, offer the possibility of increasing intervention efficacy. This randomized controlled trial examined the feasibility and efficacy of an EMI for reducing psychological distress among students with and without an emotional abuse history. Undergraduate students (N = 382) were randomly assigned to receive (a) an EMI that taught stress management skills, or (b) an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with self-monitoring of stressors and mood. Both the EMI and EMA lasted for 14 days. Participants completed outcome measures (e.g., depression, anxiety, stress symptoms) at pretest, posttest, and 3-week follow-up. Overall, the EMI appeared feasible, acceptable, and usable, with 80% to 91% completion rates. Linear mixed models indicated that there were no significant Condition × Time interaction effects in the total sample, with decreases in perceived stress and increases in positive affect over time regardless of condition (EMI vs. EMA). Moderation analyses indicated that the EMI was generally more effective for those with a history of emotional abuse and that the EMA was more effective for those without such a history. Post hoc analyses demonstrated that participants wrote less in the EMI than in a web-based version of the intervention. Future interventions could target at-risk groups based on trauma history or baseline distress. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
基于网络的压力管理干预措施对大学生有效,尤其是那些有人际创伤史的大学生。然而,这些干预措施尚未在那些报告有童年情绪虐待史的人群中进行评估,而这群人是最痛苦的。生态瞬时干预(EMI)利用手机在日常生活中提供近乎实时的心理社会干预,这为提高干预效果提供了可能。这项随机对照试验检验了 EMI 对减少有和没有情绪虐待史的学生心理困扰的可行性和疗效。将本科生(N=382)随机分配到以下两种情况:(a)接受教授压力管理技能的 EMI;或(b)接受进行压力源和情绪自我监测的生态瞬时评估(EMA)。EMI 和 EMA 均持续 14 天。参与者在预测试、后测试和 3 周随访时完成了结果测量(例如,抑郁、焦虑、压力症状)。总体而言,EMI 似乎是可行的、可接受的和可使用的,完成率为 80%至 91%。线性混合模型表明,在总样本中没有出现条件与时间的显著交互效应,无论条件如何(EMI 或 EMA),随着时间的推移,感知压力都有所下降,积极情绪有所增加。调节分析表明,对于有情绪虐待史的人,EMI 通常更有效,而对于没有这种病史的人,EMA 更有效。事后分析表明,与基于网络的干预版本相比,参与者在 EMI 中写的内容较少。未来的干预措施可以根据创伤史或基线困扰程度针对高危人群。(APA,2019)