Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 May 24;11:e54412. doi: 10.2196/54412.
The utility of brief mindfulness ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) to improve empathy and theory-of-mind has been underinvestigated, particularly in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).
In this randomized controlled trial, we aimed to examine the efficacy of a 14-day, fully self-guided, mindfulness EMI on the empathy and theory-of-mind domains for GAD.
Adults (aged ≥18 y) diagnosed with GAD were randomized to a mindfulness EMI (68/110, 61.8%) or self-monitoring app (42/110, 38.2%) arm. They completed the Interpersonal Reactivity Index self-report empathy measure and theory-of-mind test (Bell-Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task) at prerandomization, postintervention, and 1-month follow-up (1MFU) time points. Hierarchical linear modeling was conducted with the intent-to-treat principle to determine prerandomization to postintervention (pre-post intervention) and prerandomization to 1MFU (pre-1MFU) changes, comparing the mindfulness EMI to self-monitoring.
Observed effects were generally stronger from pre-1MFU than from pre-post intervention time points. From pre-post intervention time points, the mindfulness EMI was more efficacious than the self-monitoring app on fantasy (the ability to imagine being in others' shoes; between-intervention effect size: Cohen d=0.26, P=.007; within-intervention effect size: Cohen d=0.22, P=.02 for the mindfulness EMI and Cohen d=-0.16, P=.10 for the self-monitoring app). From pre-1MFU time points, the mindfulness EMI, but not the self-monitoring app, improved theory-of-mind (a window into others' thoughts and intentions through abstract, propositional knowledge about their mental states, encompassing the ability to decipher social cues) and the fantasy, personal distress (stress when witnessing others' negative experiences), and perspective-taking (understanding others' perspective) empathy domains. The effect sizes were small to moderate (Cohen d=0.15-0.36; P<.001 to P=.01) for significant between-intervention effects from pre-1MFU time points. Furthermore, the within-intervention effect sizes for these significant outcomes were stronger for the mindfulness EMI (Cohen d=0.30-0.43; P<.001 to P=.03) than the self-monitoring app (Cohen d=-0.12 to 0.21; P=.001 to P>.99) from pre-1MFU time points. No between-intervention and within-intervention effects on empathic concern (feeling affection, compassion, and care when observing others in distress, primarily attending to their emotional well-being) were observed from pre-post intervention and pre-1MFU time points.
The brief mindfulness EMI improved specific domains of empathy (eg, fantasy, personal distress, and perspective-taking) and theory-of-mind with small to moderate effect sizes in persons with GAD. Higher-intensity, self-guided or coach-facilitated, multicomponent mindfulness EMIs targeting the optimization of social relationships are likely necessary to improve the empathic concern domain in this population.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04846777; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04846777.
简短的正念生态瞬间干预(EMI)在改善同理心和心理理论方面的效用尚未得到充分研究,尤其是在广泛性焦虑症(GAD)中。
在这项随机对照试验中,我们旨在研究为期 14 天的完全自我指导的正念 EMI 对 GAD 的同理心和心理理论领域的影响。
被诊断为 GAD 的成年人(年龄≥18 岁)被随机分配到正念 EMI(68/110,61.8%)或自我监测应用程序(42/110,38.2%)组。他们在预随机化、干预后和 1 个月随访(1MFU)时间点完成了人际反应指数自我报告同理心测量和心理理论测试(Bell-Lysaker 情绪识别任务)。使用意向治疗原则进行分层线性建模,以确定从预随机化到干预后(预-后干预)和预随机化到 1MFU(预-1MFU)的变化,将正念 EMI 与自我监测进行比较。
从预-1MFU 时间点观察到的效果通常比从预-后干预时间点观察到的效果更强。从预-后干预时间点来看,正念 EMI 比自我监测应用程序在幻想(想象自己处于他人立场的能力;干预间效应大小:Cohen d=0.26,P=.007;干预内效应大小:Cohen d=0.22,P=.02 用于正念 EMI 和 Cohen d=-0.16,P=.10 用于自我监测应用程序)方面更有效。从预-1MFU 时间点来看,正念 EMI,但不是自我监测应用程序,改善了心理理论(通过关于他人心理状态的抽象、命题知识来了解他人的思想和意图,包括解读社交线索的能力)和幻想、个人痛苦(当目睹他人的负面经历时感到压力)和换位思考(理解他人的观点)同理心领域。这些效果大小为小到中等(Cohen d=0.15-0.36;P<.001 至 P=.01),表明从预-1MFU 时间点开始存在显著的干预间效应。此外,对于这些显著结果的干预内效应大小,正念 EMI 的强度大于自我监测应用程序(Cohen d=0.30-0.43;P<.001 至 P=.03),而自我监测应用程序的强度则小于自我监测应用程序(Cohen d=-0.12 至 0.21;P<.001 至 P>.99)从预-1MFU 时间点开始。从预-后干预和预-1MFU 时间点都没有观察到对共情关注(当观察到他人处于困境时感到同情、同情和关心,主要关注他们的情感健康)的干预间和干预内效应。
简短的正念 EMI 改善了 GAD 患者的特定同理心领域(例如,幻想、个人痛苦和换位思考)和心理理论,其效果大小为小到中等。在该人群中,提高社交关系优化的高强度、自我指导或教练辅助的多成分正念 EMI 可能有必要改善共情关注领域。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04846777;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04846777。