Kishimoto Reiki, Iwasaki Sumie, Fujita Kazuo
Graduate School of Letters.
J Comp Psychol. 2019 Aug;133(3):340-350. doi: 10.1037/com0000164. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in on May 9 2019 (see record 2019-35064-001). Reports several errors in errors in the article: the descriptions of conditions in the Discussion section were incorrect, the number of decimal places for some statistical values was greater, the participants' names were swapped in Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4, and the labels indicating trial types in Figures 3 and 4 were swapped and so did not correctly match the data. All versions of this article have been corrected.] Flexibly changing information processing based on required cognitive resources allows adaptation in terms of cognitive parsimony. Several species have been shown to use temporal durations between memory acquisition and retrieval as a cue for memory-controlling and to engage selectively in active memorization in situations involving lower cognitive cost. However, few studies have addressed whether signaling delay length at different stages of memory affects memorization differently. In the present study with tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella), we added visual cues signaling upcoming delay length to a delayed matching-to-sample task, so that the monkeys were informed about how long information should be maintained at different points during with-sample or after-sample conditions. We investigated whether the monkeys changed their information processing depending on their expectation of the upcoming delay length and on whether encoding was controllable (4 s vs. 16 s, Experiment 1). The results indicate that two monkeys showed different patterns depending on whether encoding was controllable, whereas the third monkey never changed her strategy. The following experiment using shorter delays showed that one monkey showed a similar pattern across experiments, providing robust evidence for cognitive flexibility in accordance with relative task difficulty (1 s vs. 8 s, Experiment 2). Overall, our results suggest that capuchins adopt two kinds of strategies depending on the experimental context, that is, expending fewer resources on relatively difficult trials and/or maintaining their processing style irrespective of delays. Their strategies aiming at saving cognitive costs may reflect a psychological function to control memory formation either prospectively or retrospectively. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
[更正通知:本文的一份勘误于2019年5月9日在线发布(见记录2019-35064-001)。报告了本文中的几处错误:讨论部分对情况的描述有误,一些统计值的小数位数更多,表1、2、3和4中参与者的名字被调换,图3和图4中表示试验类型的标签被调换,因此与数据不匹配。本文的所有版本均已更正。] 根据所需的认知资源灵活地改变信息处理方式,能够在认知简约性方面实现适应性调整。已有研究表明,几种物种会将记忆获取与检索之间的时间间隔用作记忆控制的线索,并在认知成本较低的情况下有选择地进行主动记忆。然而,很少有研究探讨记忆不同阶段的信号延迟长度是否会对记忆产生不同影响。在本项针对簇绒卷尾猴(Sapajus apella)的研究中,我们在延迟样本匹配任务中添加了表示即将到来的延迟长度的视觉线索,以便猴子们了解在样本呈现期间或样本呈现之后的不同时间点信息应保留多长时间。我们研究了猴子是否会根据对即将到来的延迟长度的预期以及编码是否可控(4秒与16秒,实验1)来改变它们的信息处理方式。结果表明,两只猴子根据编码是否可控表现出不同的模式,而第三只猴子从未改变其策略。接下来使用更短延迟的实验表明,一只猴子在各个实验中表现出相似的模式,为根据相对任务难度的认知灵活性提供了有力证据(1秒与8秒,实验2)。总体而言,我们的结果表明,卷尾猴会根据实验情境采用两种策略,即在相对困难的试验中消耗较少资源和/或无论延迟如何都保持其处理方式。它们旨在节省认知成本的策略可能反映了一种前瞻性或回顾性控制记忆形成的心理功能。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)