Suppr超能文献

七氟醚、异丙酚和卡维地洛阻断肢体远程缺血预处理的心肌保护作用。

Sevoflurane, Propofol and Carvedilol Block Myocardial Protection by Limb Remote Ischemic Preconditioning.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul 07061, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jan 11;20(2):269. doi: 10.3390/ijms20020269.

Abstract

The effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in cardiac surgery have been inconsistent. We investigated whether anesthesia or beta-blockers interfere with RIPC cardioprotection. Fifty patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized to receive limb RIPC (four cycles of 5-min of upper arm cuff inflation/deflation) in the awake state (no-anesthesia; = 17), or under sevoflurane ( = 17) or propofol ( = 16) anesthesia. In a separate crossover study, 11 healthy volunteers received either carvedilol or no medication prior to RIPC. Plasma dialysates were obtained and perfused through an isolated male Sprague⁻Dawley rat heart subjected to 30-min ischemia/60-min reperfusion, following which myocardial infarct (MI) size was determined. In the cardiac surgery study, pre-RIPC MI sizes were similar among the groups (39.7 ± 4.5% no-anesthesia, 38.9 ± 5.3% sevoflurane, and 38.6 ± 3.6% propofol). However, post-RIPC MI size was reduced in the no-anesthesia group (27.5 ± 8.0%; < 0.001), but not in the anesthesia groups (35.7 ± 6.9% sevoflurane and 35.8 ± 5.8% propofol). In the healthy volunteer study, there was a reduction in MI size with RIPC in the no-carvedilol group (41.7 ± 4.3% to 30.6 ± 8.5%; < 0.0001), but not in the carvedilol group (41.0 ± 4.0% to 39.6 ± 5.6%; = 0.452). We found that the cardioprotective effects of limb RIPC were abolished under propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia and in the presence of carvedilol therapy.

摘要

肢体缺血预处理(RIPC)对心脏手术的影响尚不一致。我们研究了麻醉或β受体阻滞剂是否会干扰 RIPC 的心脏保护作用。50 例行心脏手术的患者被随机分为清醒状态下(无麻醉;n=17)、七氟醚麻醉(n=17)或丙泊酚麻醉(n=16)下接受肢体 RIPC(4 个循环,每次 5 分钟的上臂袖带充气/放气)。在一项单独的交叉研究中,11 名健康志愿者在接受 RIPC 前分别接受卡维地洛或不接受药物治疗。获取血浆透析液并通过分离的雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠心脏进行灌注,该心脏经历 30 分钟缺血/60 分钟再灌注,然后确定心肌梗死(MI)面积。在心脏手术研究中,各组的预 RIPC 心肌梗死面积相似(无麻醉组为 39.7±4.5%,七氟醚组为 38.9±5.3%,丙泊酚组为 38.6±3.6%)。然而,无麻醉组的 RIPC 后 MI 面积减小(27.5±8.0%;<0.001),但麻醉组无此变化(七氟醚组为 35.7±6.9%,丙泊酚组为 35.8±5.8%)。在健康志愿者研究中,无卡维地洛组的 MI 面积随 RIPC 而减少(41.7±4.3%降至 30.6±8.5%;<0.0001),但卡维地洛组无此变化(41.0±4.0%降至 39.6±5.6%;=0.452)。我们发现,肢体 RIPC 的心脏保护作用在丙泊酚或七氟醚麻醉下以及卡维地洛治疗时被消除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cadf/6359553/79fa77946cb0/ijms-20-00269-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验