Candilio Luciano, Hausenloy Derek
The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
The National Institute of Health Research-University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
F1000Res. 2017 Apr 25;6:563. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10963.1. eCollection 2017.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is the revascularisation strategy of choice in patients with diabetes mellitus and complex CAD. Owing to a number of factors, including the ageing population, the increased complexity of CAD being treated, concomitant valve and aortic surgery, and multiple comorbidities, higher-risk patients are being operated on, the result of which is an increased risk of sustaining perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) and poorer clinical outcomes. As such, new treatment strategies are required to protect the heart against PMI and improve clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery. In this regard, the heart can be endogenously protected from PMI by subjecting the myocardium to one or more brief cycles of ischaemia and reperfusion, a strategy called "ischaemic conditioning". However, this requires an intervention applied directly to the heart, which may be challenging to apply in the clinical setting. In this regard, the strategy of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) may be more attractive, as it allows the endogenous cardioprotective strategy to be applied away from the heart to the arm or leg by simply inflating and deflating a cuff on the upper arm or thigh to induce one or more brief cycles of ischaemia and reperfusion (termed "limb RIC"). Although a number of small clinical studies have demonstrated less PMI with limb RIC following cardiac surgery, three recently published large multicentre randomised clinical trials found no beneficial effects on short-term or long-term clinical outcomes, questioning the role of limb RIC in the setting of cardiac surgery. In this article, we review ischaemic conditioning as a therapeutic strategy for endogenous cardioprotection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and discuss the potential reasons for the failure of limb RIC to improve clinical outcomes in this setting. Crucially, limb RIC still has the therapeutic potential to protect the heart in other clinical settings, such as acute myocardial infarction, and it may also protect other organs against acute ischaemia/reperfusion injury (such as the brain, kidney, and liver).
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是全球发病和死亡的主要原因。冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是糖尿病合并复杂CAD患者的首选血运重建策略。由于包括人口老龄化、所治疗CAD复杂性增加、同期瓣膜和主动脉手术以及多种合并症等多种因素,接受手术的高危患者增多,其结果是围手术期心肌损伤(PMI)的风险增加且临床结局较差。因此,需要新的治疗策略来保护心脏免受PMI并改善心脏手术后的临床结局。在这方面,通过使心肌经历一个或多个短暂的缺血和再灌注周期,心脏可以内源性地免受PMI影响,这一策略称为“缺血预处理”。然而,这需要直接作用于心脏的干预措施,在临床环境中应用可能具有挑战性。在这方面,远程缺血预处理(RIC)策略可能更具吸引力,因为它通过简单地在上臂或大腿上充气和放气袖带以诱导一个或多个短暂的缺血和再灌注周期(称为“肢体RIC”),使内源性心脏保护策略能够在远离心脏的手臂或腿部应用。尽管一些小型临床研究表明心脏手术后肢体RIC可减少PMI,但最近发表的三项大型多中心随机临床试验发现其对短期或长期临床结局无有益影响,这对肢体RIC在心脏手术中的作用提出了质疑。在本文中,我们回顾了缺血预处理作为心脏手术患者内源性心脏保护的治疗策略,并讨论了肢体RIC在这种情况下未能改善临床结局的潜在原因。至关重要的是,肢体RIC在其他临床环境中仍具有保护心脏的治疗潜力,如急性心肌梗死,并且它还可能保护其他器官免受急性缺血/再灌注损伤(如脑、肾和肝)。